Definitely.

What absolutely filth.  This is nothing but an attempt to destroy the Traditional movement ... BY HIS OWN ADMISSION ... denouncing those who reject the "legitimacy" of the V2 "reforms".

As with most Modernists, Bergoglio suddenly believes in EENS dogma, except that only Trads are outside the Church:

Of course, according to Bergoglio, practicing sodomites, adulterers, etc. can all be saved ... but not Traditionalists who are not united "with their heart" (i.e. accept Vatican II).

So the only thing that will put you outside of the Church and outside salvation is to be a Traditional Catholics.
.Vicar of Christ.

It's really very simple - we have our souls to save, the status of the pope? - not our business.

I came across this a few days ago while looking for something else in Who Shall Ascend?......

"...The divisive aberration of Sedevacantism is due to nothing else than certain priests' losing sight of their proper roles in our present malaise. To save the Church from an heretical pope was never their assignment. Securing the Apostolic succession of the Church was never their assignment. What was their assignment? It was to take care of the people whom God sent them as best they could, say their prayers faithfully, study and pray that they might not themselves fall victim to the spirit of Liberalism and worldliness, and keep their torment and speculations to themselves. The hierarchical structure of the Church and the papacy are not their business. Such high matters are the province of none other than Christ Himself and His Mother and the Apostles...."

Unfortunately, it became their business once a revolution came from the top-down. Priests trying to defend their flocks is precisely why the sedevacantist thesis arose as an answer as to why heresy and error were coming out of the Vatican. It became the business of the bishop, priest and layman once the hierarchy apostatized from the traditional Catholic faith. This is true also of the R&R camp of Catholics, and is why a traditionalist "movement" exists at all.

Sedevacantist or sedeplenist, the line has been drawn in the sand through this move by Francis and we are all now considered "outside" of the Church.

I think we, as trads, could learn much from the cooperation of the 70s and 80s these days, as the division between the Novus Ordo and the Catholic Church has become that much more pronounced. I think a "never-sede" position is just as harmful to the Church as the "non una cuм".

Which church?  Catholic or conciliar?
Ps: This cake tastes wonderful.

Ok, you tell me, is Bergoglio the head of the Catholic Church or conciliar church?

And I completely agree with that. I am not speaking as if sedevacantism is the only answer, or the correct answer, but the position I've found to be most logically consistent with the indefectibility of the Church. Just as others have found profession of these conciliar "popes" to be their most logically consistent position. Sedevacantist or sedeplenist, the line has been drawn in the sand through this move by Francis and we are all now considered "outside" of the Church.