What does this have to do with sedevacantism?
Here's an official Magisterial act where Bergoglio:
1) abrogates the Tridentine Mass
and
2) declares that those who reject the legitimacy of the new reforms are outside the Church
We've had to put up with the R&R garbage about how it's "not mandatory," the "TLM was never abrogated" etc. etc. ad nauseam.
Now that ship has sailed, folks.
Bergoglio has just outlawed Traditional Catholicism, abrogated the Tridentine Mass, and made the NOM explicitly mandatory.
The sedes think/pretend every new Roman outrage compels sedevacantism.
They’ve been saying the S.O.S. for 50 years.
In reality, the new situation only brings those who care back to 1984/8.
As far as not being able to resist a pope, here’s their (misappropriated) champion saying the opposite:
“Just as it is licit to resist a Pontiff who attacks the body, so also is it licit to resist him who attacks souls or destroys the civil order or above all, tries to destroy the Church. I say that it is licit to resist him by not doing what he orders and by impeding the execution of his will. It is not licit, however, to judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior.” (De Romano Pontifice, II.29.)
PLEASE let one of them cite Fr. Cekada’s article as a rebuttal (which, whatever Fr. Cekada thought, did not accomplish nullifying this quote, as it set out to).