CathInfo.com

Even Ratzinger's Motu left it to the bishops.

Only difference was:

Ratzinger:  permitted unless denied.
Bergoglio:  denied unless permitted.

So no PRACTICAL difference ... except for all priests ordained after the Motu have to get permission from ROME to be able to say the Tridentine Mass.  So they hope to extinguish the Traditional Mass over time.  So I wonder whether Xavier, if he gest ordained some day, will go to Rome to get permission.

But the real problem here is that Bergoglio:
1) claims that the NOM is the EXCLUSIVE expression of the Roman Rite (i.e. rejects Ratzinger's extraordinary form thing)
2) says the bishops are required to determine that any Motu groups do NOT reject the legitimacy of the NOM

So, R&R, is this guy still your pope?

But the real problem here is that Bergoglio:
1) claims that the NOM is the EXCLUSIVE expression of the Roman Rite (i.e. rejects Ratzinger's extraordinary form thing)
2) says the bishops are required to determine that any Motu groups do NOT reject the legitimacy of the NOM

Yes, these are some of my same conclusions regarding this.  I also found these remarks in the Letter to the Bishops noteworthy:

But I am nonetheless saddened that the instrumental use of Missale Romanum of 1962 is often characterized by a rejection not only of the liturgical reform, but of the Vatican Council II itself, claiming, with unfounded and unsustainable assertions, that it betrayed the Tradition and the “true Church”.

The path of the Church must be seen within the dynamic of Tradition “which originates from the Apostles and progresses in the Church with the assistance of the Holy Spirit” (DV 8). A recent stage of this dynamic was constituted by Vatican Council II where the Catholic episcopate came together to listen and to discern the path for the Church indicated by the Holy Spirit.

To doubt the Council is to doubt the intentions of those very Fathers who exercised their collegial power in a solemn manner cuм Petro et sub Petro in an ecuмenical council,[14] and, in the final analysis, to doubt the Holy Spirit himself who guides the Church.