Author Topic: BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF  (Read 1872 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 54rosary

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 375
  • Reputation: +145/-48
  • Gender: Male
Re: BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF
« Reply #45 on: February 23, 2021, 10:33:06 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • How sad the world is, not only do we have a FALSE person, believing to be a Pope,  we in the U.S.A. have a false President believing he is a President.

    There are so many parallels between these two false leaders.

    To begin with, they daily prove that they are both satan's children.

    Of course we know that GOD has allowed them both to be counterfeit, false leaders.


    This reminds me of  MATTHEW 4: 8 - 9

    ''[8] Again the devil took him up into a very high mountain, and shewed him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them,  [9]  And said to him: All these will I give thee, if falling down thou wilt adore me ''

    We have not been left without GOD'S many gifts given to all with eyes to see and ears to hear regarding recognition in both of these two situations.

    Our Lord’s response in MATTHEW 4: 10 as follows:

    ''Then Jesus saith to him: Begone, Satan: for it is written, The Lord thy God shalt thou adore, and him only shalt thou serve.''

    The bergoglio and bıdɛn response to the devil is no less than, give it to me, I want it, I belong to you.

    Offline 54rosary

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 375
    • Reputation: +145/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF
    « Reply #46 on: February 23, 2021, 01:10:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Antipope Bergoglio’s Conclave

    By José Alberto Villasana Munguía June 27, 2018  


    Aside from the fact that the renunciation of Benedict XVI was invalid, as he was submitted to international pressures as well as death threats and threats of schism, and apart from the fact that Bergoglio and nine other cardinals excommunicated themselves from the church before the 2013 conclave by illicitly plotting in favour of the Argentinian, the conclave itself was plagued with irregularities, which, according to Article 76 of the Constitution Universi Domenici gregis, “The ɛƖɛctıon is null and void, without the need for any declaration on the matter, and consequently, it confers no right on the one elected”. In other words, however you look at it, Bergoglio is not a true Pope but rather the 38th antipope in the history of the church.

    Regarding the invalidity of Benedict XVI’s renunciation, six elements exist that show the way the Pope was pressurised to force him to resign.

    With respect to the illegitimate collusion in favour of Bergoglio, which Cardinal Godfried Danneels revealed in his autography, and during the discourse of the presentation of his book, how he and eight other cardinals formed a “mafia club”, known among themselves as the “The Saint Galen Group”, in order to scheme against Benedict XVI and so bring Bergoglio to the Papacy.

    Article 79 of the Constitution Universi Domenici Gregis, which establishes the details of how the conclave must be celebrated, says the following: “Confirming the prescriptions of my predecessors, I likewise forbid anyone, even if he is a cardinal, during the Pope’s lifetime and without having consulted him, to make plans concerning the ɛƖɛctıon of his successor, or to promise votes, or to make decisions in this regard in private gatherings”.

    And in article 81 it is established that these agreements are punished with excommunication latae sententiae (i.e. automatic, without the need of a declaration by anybody, ipso facto and eo ipsa).

    The information revealed by Cardinal Daneels days before the Synod, coincides with that published by Austin Ivereigh, in his book “The Great Reformer” in which he reveals how, during the 2013 conclave, four cardinals from the Mafioso Saint Galen group (Kasper, Lehman, Danneels and Murphy O’Connor) came together to illicitly orchestrate a campaign in favour of the ɛƖɛctıon of Bergoglio, after the latter had agreed to be the beneficiary of this scheming.

    It must be pointed out that Ivereigh is a great admirer of Francis, and that he also went to the Vatican to present him personally with a copy of his book, without realising that in chap. 9 “The Conclave”, in which he relates how a group of cardinals which he calls “Team Bergoglio”, carried out a campaign of illegitimate scheming to smooth the way for the Argentinian candidate, thereby compromising the legitimacy of the ɛƖɛctıon.

    Certainly Ivereigh did not know that the Constitution which governs the conclaves, the Universi Domenici Gregis establishes the pain of excommunication latae sententiae (i.e. automatic, without the need of a declaration by anybody) for the cardinals who promoted voting for any other cardinal. (Art 81, 82, 83).

    Those responsible for this scheming were immєdιαtely excommunicated, ipso facto, and eo ipso, according to canon law and were no longer part of the church. Furthermore, the Constitution also points out that the recipient of this lobbying is also excommunicated. In other words, according to Pontifical Law, Bergoglio would have been outside the church at the moment of his ɛƖɛctıon.

    After the ɛƖɛctıon came the two books which revealed the serious irregularities committed within the conclave that elected Bergoglio. The first is the book by Elisabbeta Piqué (Bergoglio’s authorised biographer from Argentina) entitled “Francisco, Vida y Revolución” (Francisco, Life and ʀɛʋօʟutιօn). Piqué knew, through Francis himself, what happened inside the conclave. The other book is by the famous vaticanologist Antonio Socci “Non é Francesco” (Francis is not the Pope).

    The revelations of Piqué are so well believed as coming from Francis that the Osservatore Romano, the official Vatican newspaper, published the chapter that deals with how the conclave developed. Vatican Radio and Television did likewise. What happened is that Bergoglio, on being elected Pope, felt that the threat of excommunication – which falls on any cardinal for revealing what happened in the conclave – no longer affected him and related to the journalist the things that happened within the Sistine Chapel.

    The narration: In the conclave, in the evening of the 13th of March, in the fourth vote count of the day, there were 116 votes when there were only 115 cardinals in the hall. One cardinal put in one paper too many. This fourth vote was won by Cardinal Angelo Scola of Milan (The Italian Episcopal Conference itself released a bulletin congratulating Scola for having been elected Pope). This vote count was improperly annulled. Angelo Scola’s website published that the recently elected Pope had taken the name of John XXIV. Wikipedia also published it. A few minutes later both sites took down this result. What happened is that when the recently elected Pope was on his way to the balcony of Saint Peter’s, a group of cardinals, mostly Germans and Americans, approached him to tell him that he had to return to the Sistine Chapel because the vote count had to be annulled.

    Now, the Apostolic Constitution Universi Domenici Gregis (Art 69) establishes that if two folded papers came from the same cardinal with the same name or if one was blank, they must be counted as a single vote. If, on the other hand, there were two different names, both papers are annulled and none of the two votes is valid. But it clearly establishes: “In none of the two cases must the ɛƖɛctıon be annulled”. In this case there was an extra white paper. The established procedure was not followed but rather the ɛƖɛctıon was annulled, which was expressly prohibited.

    Contravening the dispositions of the Constitution, the fourth vote count was declared null, they forced Cardinal Angelo Scola, recently elected and having taken the name of John XXIV, to resign and return to the Sistine Chapel, and they proceeded with a fifth vote in which Jorge Mario Bergoglio was elected.

    This was the second irregularity of the conclave, because the Constitution establishes (Art 63) that there must only be four voting sessions per day, two in the morning and two in the evening.

    The case for saying that the designation of Bergoglio is effectively invalid is clear, according to canon lawyers, who refer us to article 76 which states: “Should the ɛƖɛctıon take place in a way other than that prescribed in the present Constitution, or should the conditions laid down here not be observed, the ɛƖɛctıon is for this very reason null and void, without any need for a declaration on the matter; consequently, it confers no right on the one elected”.

    This pile of evidence led Cardinal George Pell to declare that Francis could well be the 38th antipope in the history of the church, and not the 266th Pope as the vast majority believe.

    Finally, it is worth pointing out here, that even if all the aforementioned be cast in doubt or discredited, all opposing arguments collapse with Cardinal Danneels’s admission in his biography, that he and a group of cardinals, the “Mafia Club”, plotted to force Benedict XVI to resign. When you have a confession, proof is not necessary.

    This is how some saints and mystics describe the schism that will rock the Church, and which could have a lot to do with the Papal heresy we are witnessing:

    Saint Francis of Assisi: There will be an uncanonically elected Pope who will cause a great schism in the Church”.

    Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich (Augustinian religious): “I saw an intense opposition between two Popes, and I saw how harmful would be the consequences of the false Church (...) this will cause the greatest schism ever seen in the history of the Church”.

    Sister Lucy of Fatima: There will be cardinals against cardinals, bishops against bishops; Satan will walk among them”.
    And the most important, the revelation of the Blessed Virgin at La Salette: “Rome will loose the faith and become the seat of the Antichrist”.


    Offline 54rosary

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 375
    • Reputation: +145/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF
    « Reply #47 on: February 23, 2021, 01:46:55 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • The Prophecies of Blessed Anna-Katarina Emmerick
    (Anne Catherine Emmerich)

    Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich was a Roman Catholic Augustinian Canoness Regular of Windesheim, mystic, Marian visionary, ecstatic and stigmatist. Excerpts from The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

    "I saw again the strange big church that was being built there in Rome. There was nothing holy in it. I saw this just as I saw a movement led by Ecclesiastics to which contributed angels, saints, and other Christians. But there in the strange big church all the work was being done mechanically according to set rules and formulae. Everything was being done according to human reason …I saw all sorts of people, things, doctrines, and opinions. There was something proud, presumptuous, and violent about it, and they seemed very successful. I di not see a single Angel nor a single saint helping in the work. But far away in the background, I saw the seat of the cruel people armed with spears, and I saw a laughing figure which said: "Do build it as solid as you can; we will pull it to the ground. I saw again the new and odd-looking church which they were trying to build. There was nothing holy about it … People were kneading bread in the crypt below … but it would not rise, nor did they receive the body of our Lord, but only bread. Those who were in error, through no fault of their own, and who piously and ardently longed for the Body of Jesus were spiritually consoled, but not by their communion. Then my Guide (Jesus) said: "This is Babel".
     "I saw deplorable things: they were gambling, drinking, and talking in church; they were also courting women. All sorts of abominations were perpetrated there. Priests allowed everything and said Mass with much irreverence. I saw that few of them were still godly… All these things caused me much distress."



    "Then I saw the connection between the two Popes and the two temples. I am sorry that I have forgotten the numbers, but I was shown how weak the one had been in adherents and human support, but how strong in courage to overturn so many gods (I knew the number) and to unite so many different forms of worship into one; and, on the contrary, how strong in numbers and yet how irresolute in action was the other since, in authorizing the erection of false temples, he had allowed the only true God, the only true religion to be lost among so many false gods and false religions. It was also shown me that those pagans humbly adored gods other than themselves, and that they would have been willing to admit in all simplicity the only God, the Most Holy Trinity. Their worship was preferable to that of those who adore themselves in a thousand idols to the total exclusion of Our Lord. The picture was favorable to the early ages, for in them idolatry was on the decrease, while in our days it is just the contrary. I saw the fatal consequences of this counterfeit church; I saw it increase; I saw heretics of all kinds flocking to the city. I saw the ever-increasing tepidity of the clergy, the circle of darkness ever widening. And now the vision became more extended. I saw in all places Catholics oppressed, annoyed, restricted, and deprived of liberty, churches were closed, and great misery prevailed everywhere with war and bƖσσdshɛd. I saw rude, ignorant people offering violent resistance, but this state of things lasted not long. Again I saw in vision St. Peter’s undermined according to a plan devised by the secret sect while, at the same time, it was damaged by storms; but it was delivered at the moment of greatest distress. Again I saw the Blessed Virgin extending her mantle over it."

    "I had another vision of the great tribulation. It seems to me that a concession was demanded from the clergy which could not be granted. I saw many older priests, especially one, who wept bitterly. A few younger ones were also weeping. But others, and the lukewarm among them, readily did what was demanded. It was as if people were splitting into two camps."

    "I saw that many pastors allowed themselves to be taken up with ideas that were dangerous to the Church. They were building a great, strange, and extravagant Church. Everyone was to be admitted in it in order to be united and have equal rights: Evangelicals, Catholics, sects of every description. Such was to be the new Church … But God had other designs. "

    "Then I saw an apparition of the Mother of God, and she said that the tribulation would be very great. She added that people must pray fervently with outstretched arms, be it only long enough to say three Our Fathers. This was the way her Son prayed for them on the Cross. They must rise at twelve at night, and pray in this manner; and they must keep coming to the Church. They must pray above all for the Church of Darkness to leave Rome… These were all good and devout people, and they did not know where help and guidance should be sought. There were no traitors and enemies among them, yet they were afraid of one another…" "I saw more martyrs, not now but in the future … I saw the secret sect relentlessly undermining the great Church. Near them I saw a horrible beast coming up from the sea. All over the world, good and devout people, especially the clergy, were harassed, oppressed, and put into prison … "

    "Whole Catholic communities were being oppressed, harassed, confined, and deprived of their freedom. I saw many churches closed down, great miseries everywhere, wars and bƖσσdshɛd. A wild and ignorant mob took violent action. But it did not last long… "

    “Last night, from eleven to three, I had a most wonderful vision of two churches and two Popes and a variety of things, ancient and modern…. I saw the fatal consequences of this counterfeit church; I saw it increase; I saw heretics of all kinds flocking to the city. I saw the ever-increasing tepidity of the clergy, the circle of darkness ever widening. And now the vision became more extended. I saw in all places Catholics oppressed, annoyed, restricted, and deprived of liberty, churches were closed, and great misery prevailed everywhere with war and bƖσσdshɛd. I saw rude, ignorant people offering violent resistance, but this state of things lasted not long. Again I saw in vision St. Peter’s undermined according to a plan devised by the secret sect while, at the same time, it was damaged by storms; but it was delivered at the moment of greatest distress. Again I saw the Blessed Virgin extending her mantle over it.”

    “I saw the Holy Father very prayerful and God-fearing, his figure perfect, though worn out by old age and manifold sufferings, his head sunk on his breast as if in sleep. He often fainted away and seemed to be dying. I often saw him supported by apparitions during his prayer, and then his head was upright. When it sank upon his breast, then were the minds of many turned quickly here and there; that is, viewing things in a worldly light…. These visions were so frightful that I came near crying out. I see in the future religion falling so low that it will be practiced only here and there in farmhouses and in families protected by God during the horrors of war.”

    “I see the Holy Father in great distress. He lives in another palace and receives only a few to his presence. If the wicked party knew their own great strength, they would even now have made an attack. I fear the Holy Father will suffer many tribulations before his death, for I see the black counterfeit church gaining ground, I see its fatal influence on the public. The distress of the Holy Father and of the Church is really so great that one ought to pray to God day and night. I have been told to pray much for the Church and the Pope…. Last night I was taken to Rome where the Holy Father, plunged in affliction, is still concealed in order to elude dangerous exigencies. He is very feeble, quite worn out by distress, anxiety, and prayer. His chief reason for lying concealed is because he can now trust so few.”

    “I know not now how I went to Rome last night, but I found myself near the church of St. Mary-Major. Around it I saw crowds of poor, pious souls, in great distress and anxiety on account of the Pope’s disappearance and the agitation and alarming reports throughout the city. Led by one common impulse, they had come to invoke the Mother of God. They did not expect to find the church open, they intended only to pray outside. But I was inside, I opened the door and they entered, astounded at the door’s opening of itself. I was standing aloof where they could not see me. There was no service, only the chancel-lamps were burning, and the people knelt in quiet prayer. Then the Mother of God appeared. She said that great tribulations were at hand; that the people must pray earnestly with extended arms, if only for the length of three Our Fathers, for it was thus that her Son had prayed for them upon the Cross; that they should rise at midnight to pray thus; that they should continue to come to her church which they would always find open; and that they should, above all, pray for the extirpation of the dark church.”
    “I saw heartrending misery, playing, drinking, gossiping, even courting going on in the church. All sorts of abominations were committed in it; they had even set up a ninepin alley in the middle of it. The priests let things go their way and said Mass very irreverently; only a few of them were still a little intelligent and pious. I saw Jҽωs standing around the doorways. All this grieved me deeply. Then my Heavenly Spouse bound me as He Himself had been bound to the pillar, and He said: ‘So will the Church yet be bound. She will be tightly bound before she shall again arise.’”

    “‘Very evil times are coming,’ [my guide] said. ‘The non-Catholics will mislead many. They will use every possible means to entice them from the Church, and great disturbances will follow.’ I had then another vision in which I saw the King’s daughter armed for the struggle. Multitudes contributed to this with prayers, good works, all sorts of labors and self-victories which passed from hand to hand up to Heaven where each was wrought, according to its kind, into a piece of armor for the virgin warrior. The perfect adjustment of the various pieces was most remarkable, as also their wonderful signification. She was armed from head to foot. I knew many of those who contributed the armor, and I saw with surprise that whole institutions and great and learned people furnished nothing. The contribution was made chiefly by the poor and lowly. And now I saw the battle. The enemies’ ranks were by far the more numerous; but the little body of the faithful cut down whole rows of them. The armed virgin stood off on a hill. I ran to her, pleading for my country and those other places for which I had to pray. She was armed singularly, but significantly, with helmet, shield, and coat of mail, and the soldiers were like those of our own day. The battle was terrible; only a handful of victorious champions survived!”


    Taken from - https://thewildvoice.org/end-time-prophecies/#Emmerick

    Offline 54rosary

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 375
    • Reputation: +145/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF
    « Reply #48 on: February 23, 2021, 02:43:46 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  •  
    GUEST POST: “The False Prophet – Jorge Bergoglio?” by Benedict Carter


    This timely guest post is written by Benedict Carter, a 57-year old English Catholic who lives in Fatima in Portugal. A cradle Traditionalist Catholic, he holds a BA Honours and a Masters degree in History from Cambridge University. This is a comprehensive piece, filled with invaluable quotes and citations.  I recommend bookmarking and saving this one for reference and consolation. -AB

    THE FALSE PROPHET – JORGE BERGOGLIO?

    “One day, through the Rosary and the Scapular, I will save the world.”

    Quote
    Fifth Lateran Council in 1516, under Pope Leo X
     We command all those who exercise the function of preaching, or will do so in the future, not to presume, either in their sermons or in their affirmations, to fix a date for future evils, whether for the coming of Antichrist or for the Day of Judgment, seeing that the Truth has said: ‘It is not for you to know the times or the moments, which the Father put in His own power .’ Those, therefore, who have had the audacity to make such statements in the past have lied, and it is well known that, on their account, the authority of those who preach wisely has greatly suffered.
    Only God knows for sure

    Given the solemn command of an Ecumenical Council, I begin by saying that the ideas presented here are my own, though I draw, heavily at times, on the work of a Catholic friend in Australia. As a layman with no theological training I have no authority whatsoever to make any definite claims and I make none. If on any point someone is able to point out any error I have made, I will cheerfully acknowledge the error and withdraw it.

    Anyone reflecting on St. John’s Appocalypse must bear St. Augustine’s words in mind as he proceeds. In ‘The City of God’ St. Augustine says, “No doubt, though this book is called the Apocalypse, there are in it many obscure passages to exercise the mind of the reader, and there are few passages so plain as to assist in the interpretation of others, even though we take pains; and this difficulty is increased by the repetition of the same things, in forms so different, that the things referred to seem to be different, although in fact they are only differently stated.”

    Outline of the Argument

    That said, let us summarise the article for its readers with the help of the Catholic Encyclopedia (1917): “ … the “day of the Lord” will be preceded by the “man of sin” known in the Johannine Epistles as Antichrist; the “man of sin” is preceded by “a revolt,” or a great apostasy; this   apostasy is the outcome of the “mystery of iniquity” which already “worketh”, and which, according to St. John, shows itself here and there by faint types of Antichrist. The Apostle gives three stages in the evolution of evil: the leaven of iniquity, the great apostasy, and the man of  sin. But he adds a clause calculated to determine the time of the main event more accurately; he describes something first as a thing (to datechon), then as a person (ho katechon), preventing the occurrence of the main event: ‘Only he who now holdeth, do hold, until he be taken out of the way.’”

    I only add that the arrival of the Antichrist is heralded by the False Prophet. This article asks if this false prophet – THE False Prophet – might be Jorge Bergoglio.

    Why might our era in particular be Apocalyptic, when every Catholic age has been awaiting the return of Our Lord; and many times exegetes thought that He would come in their time? There is no doubt that in the latter several centuries, the warnings of Our Lady, the understanding of many Saints, from St. John Eudes to St. Pio of Pietrelcina, the arrival in clear view of the Anti-Church following Vatican II and the consequent collapse of the Church into open apostasy all suggest that our time is much more proximate to Scripture than others. Let us review some of these suggestions:

    Quote
    “Surely, there is at this day a confederacy of evil, marshalling its hosts from all parts of the world, organizing itself, taking its measures, enclosing the Church of Christ as in a net, and preparing the way for a general Apostasy from it. Whether this very Apostasy is to give birth to Antichrist, or whether he is still to be delayed, as he has already been delayed so long, we cannot know; but at any rate this Apostasy, and all its tokens and instruments, are of the Evil One, and savour of death.” Blessed John Newman (1801 – 1890)

    “We have (2 Thessalonians 2:3-11) a prophecy of a (spiritual) revolt, which shall precede the Second Coming of Our Lord. The authority from which the revolt is to take place is that of the kingdom of God on earth, prophesied by Daniel (cf. Daniel 2) as the kingdom which the God would set up – in other words, the One and Universal Church, founded by our Divine Lord, and spread by His Apostles throughout the world. In this one only kingdom was deposited the true and supernatural pure theism, or knowledge of God, and the true and only faith of God Incarnate, with the doctrines and laws of grace. This, then, is the authority from which the revolt is to be made, be that revolt what it may.” Cardinal Manning in “The Perpetual Conflict of the Vicar of Christ”, pp. 81-173.
    And Manning again:

    Quote
    “The apostasy of the city of Rome from the vicar of Christ and its destruction by Antichrist may be thoughts so new to many Catholics, that I think it well to recite the text of theologians of greatest repute. First Malvenda, who writes expressly on the subject, states as the opinion of Ribera, Gaspar Melus, Biegas, Suarrez, Bellarmine and Bosius that Rome shall apostatise from the faith, drive away the Vicar of Christ and return to its ancient paganism. …Then the Church shall be scattered, driven into the wilderness, and shall be for a time, as it was in the beginning, invisible hidden in catacombs, in dens, in mountains, in lurking places; for a time it shall be swept, as it were from the face of the earth. Such is the universal testimony of the Fathers of the early Church.”-The Present Crisis of the Holy See, 1861

    “These most crafty enemies have filled and inebriated with gall and bitterness the Church, the spouse of the immaculate Lamb, and have laid impious hands on her most sacred possessions. In the Holy Place itself, where has been set up the See of the Most Holy Peter and the Chair of Truth for the light of the world, they have raised the throne of their abominable impiety, with the iniquitous design that when the Pastor has been struck, the sheep may be scattered.” Pope Leo XIII’s Prayer to St. Michael the Archangel (The Raccolta, 1910, p. 125)
    And closer to our own times:-

    Quote
    Pope John Paul II, went further than Newman, saying in 1979: “We are now standing in the face of the greatest historical confrontation humanity has gone through. I do not think the wide circle of American society or the wide circles of the Christian community realize this fully. We are now facing the final confrontation between the Church and the Anti-Church, of the Gospel versus the Anti-Gospel. This confrontation lies within the plans of Divine Providence …”.

    What remained unsaid by John Paul and might be deduced from the phrase the final confrontation was the Apocalyptic battle between Christ and the Antichrist, for the Fathers of the Church consistently taught that the final battle is to be between them.

    Fatima scholars have long ago noted a reference to this final confrontation in Sr. Lucia’s conversation with Fr Fuentes: “Father, the Most Holy Virgin did not tell me that we are in the last times of the world but she made me understand this for three reasons. (1) … she told me that the devil is in the mood for engaging in a decisive battle against the Virgin. And a decisive battle is the final battle … (2) she said … that God is giving two last remedies to the world. These are the Holy Rosary and Devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. These are the last two remedies which signify that there will be no others. (3) … in the plans of Divine Providence, God always before He is about to chastise the world exhausts all other remedies.”

    Admitting that he had read the Third Secret of Fatima, Cardinal Ratzinger explained why it had not been revealed. “According to the judgements of the Popes it adds nothing (different) to what a Christian must know concerning what derives from Revelation: that is, a radical call for conversion, the absolute importance of history, the dangers threatening the faith and the life of the Christian, and therefore the world. And then the importance of the ‘novissimi’ (the last events at the end of time) … the things contained in this Third Secret correspond to what has been announced in Scripture.”

    The last events at the end of time”? “Correspond to what has been announced in Scripture“? Given his knowledge of the Third Secret, what did Cardinal Ratzinger have in mind? Sr. Lucia had already stated that the Third Secret related to Chapters 12 and 13 of the Apocalypse, chapters relating to ‘the Woman clothed with the sun’ and the Antichrist. Is that what the Cardinal was alluding to? An insight is given in Cardinal Ratzinger’s statement opposing the Catholic Church’s participation in the syncretic ‘Council for Peace’.

    “The proposed Council for Peace which would bring together many different religions is, due to the very essence of the Church, impossible.” With these words Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger explained the reason for the refusal of the Catholic Church to join in a meeting which would bring together all the great world religions on the theme of peace, disarmament and the environment. “It needs to be said that the effort to establish a world-wide reign of peace by means of a world union of religions has a disturbing similarity to the third temptation of Jesus – All the kingdoms of the earth I will give unto you if you, prostrating yourself, will worship me.” (Matt 4.9). He continued: ‘It is evident that a peace established in this way would by its very nature be transformed into a totalitarianism of the sole authorised way of thinking or would threaten to be turned upside down into a world cινιℓ ωαr … In this sense the New Testament says of the Antichrist that he will present himself as a messenger of peace and security.’ (1 Thess 5:3).

    Ratzinger noted that one of the most profound interpreters of this passage was the Russian theologian Vladimir Soloviev, whose ‘Legend of the Antichrist’ characterises the Antichrist precisely as the one who terms himself the establisher of world peace.

    “Confusion, division, and error” within the Catholic Church coming from shepherds even at the highest levels indicate that we may be in the end times, said U.S. Cardinal Raymond Burke in an address in Kentucky. The Cardinal, who spoke at the July 22nd “Church Teaches Forum” in Louisville, said that, in his opinion, the times “realistically seem to be apocalyptic.” Louisville, Kentucky, August 8, 2017 (LifeSiteNews)

    And Cardinal Willem Eijk, the Primate of the Netherlands, 5th May 2018, regarding the plan to admit to Holy Communion the civilly divorced, public adulterers called the “remarried”:
    “Observing that the bishops and, above all, the Successor of Peter fail to maintain and transmit faithfully and in unity the deposit of faith contained in Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture, I cannot help but think of Article 675 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church …”.

    That Article is titled, “The Church’s ultimate trial”, and reads as follows:

    Quote
    “Before Christ’s second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers. The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the ‘mystery of iniquity’ in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth.”
    It seems then that at least three former Popes and several current Cardinals consider contemporary events to be proximate indicators of the Reign of Antichrist. How do these publicly-expressed statement compare with those of the Fathers and Doctors of the Church?

    Consider first of all what St. Alphonsus Liguori wrote: “The devil has always managed to get rid of the Mass by means of the heretics, making them the precursors of the Antichrist who, above all else, will manage to abolish, and in fact will succeed in abolishing, as a punishment for the sins of men, the Holy Sacrifice of the Altar, precisely as Daniel predicted.”

    The Abomination of Desolation

    This introduces a new element into the matter, the abolishment of the Mass, “precisely as Daniel predicted.”

    What did the prophet Daniel say? “And strength was given him against the continual sacrifice, because of sins: and truth shall be cast down on the ground and he shall do and prosper.” (Dan 8:12). “The victim and the sacrifice shall fail: and there shall be in the temple the abomination of desolation.” (Dan 9:27). “They shall defile the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the continual sacrifice, and they shall place there the abomination of desolation.” (Dan 11:31).

    The Fathers of the Church agree that the ‘abomination of desolation’ is the Antichrist. It appears then that the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass fails, or loses its efficacy, thus clearing the way for the Antichrist.

    This is confirmed by Saint Paul. “Let no man deceive you by any means: for unless there come a revolt first, and the man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition, who opposeth and is lifted up above all that is called God or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God. … And now you know what withholdeth, that he may be revealed in his time. For the mystery of iniquity already worketh: only that he who now holdeth do hold, until he be taken out of the way. And then that wicked one shall be revealed,” (2 Thess 2:3-8).

    The Fathers of the Church agree that the ‘man of sin’ is the Antichrist and the word ‘revolt’ is translated ‘apostasy’ in the Greek. St Paul refers to something which restrains the Antichrist, but that when removed, permits him to be revealed. He describes this restraint as being both neuter (what) and masculine (he). Similarly, Daniel prophesied that “the victim (masculine) and the sacrifice (neuter) shall fail: and there shall be in the temple the abomination of desolation”, the Antichrist. This restraint is the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Other references (linked to Daniel) are found in Matthew 24 and Mark 13.

    In an astounding statement, echoing the Ottaviani Intervention, Cardinal Ratzinger admitted that the drastic manner in which Pope Paul VI reformed the Mass in 1969 provoked “extremely serious damage.” He said that the suppression of the old Mass marked a “break in the history of the liturgy, the consequences of which could only be tragic … I am convinced that the ecclesial crisis in which we find ourselves today (and he said this in 1997!) depends in great part on the collapse of the liturgy … I was dismayed by the ban on the old Missal, since such a development had never been seen in the history of liturgy … Action should be taken to repair the damage … For the life of the Church, it is dramatically urgent to have a renewal of liturgical awareness, a liturgical reconciliation, which goes back to recognising the unity in the history of the liturgy …”.

    On this matter, St. Hippolytus writes:

    “And the churches, too, will wail with a mighty lamentation, because neither ‘oblation nor incense’ is attended to, nor a service acceptable to God; but the sanctuaries of the churches will become like a garden-watcher’s hut, and the holy Body and Blood of Christ will not be shown in those days. The public service of God shall be extinguished, psalmody shall cease, the reading of the Scriptures shall not be heard; but for men there shall be darkness, and lamentation on lamentation, and woe on woe (Saint Hippolytus, Op. cit., pp. 250, 251).”

    Cornelius Lapide says that, though the public celebration of the Mass will cease, it will continue to be said in the mountains and caves, as in the catacombs of old. He cites Psalm XXII, 5 in confirmation of this: “Thou hast prepared a table before me against them that afflict me.”
    Once the continual sacrifice is taken away, Satan will be unleashed in all his fury.

    “Collapse of the liturgy … ecclesial crisis … for the life of the Church it is dramatically urgent …”.

    In language recalling Daniel and St. Paul, Ratzinger admitted that the Novus Ordo Mass has failed. The effects of the Novus Ordo are so bad that we will accept that it fits.

    Let us return to Sr. Lucia of Fatima. Why did Our Lady tell Lucia dos Santos that there were only two remedies left – the Holy Rosary and Devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary? Why was the Mass not given as a remedy? It seems fair to surmise that the Blessed Virgin had knowledge that the Mass would fail.

    The Revolt

    St. Paul introduced another element, the apostasy. “… unless there come a revolt first, and the man of sin be revealed …”. The apostasy is to accompany the collapse of the Mass culminating in the arrival of the Antichrist. Is Cardinal Ratzinger’s “ecclesial crisis”, what we now see openly from Bergoglio and his followers, which effectively is the open announcement of the Anti-Church, St. Paul’s apostasy?

    Cardinal Oddi attended the Fatima 2000 Conference in Rome. The Conference Report disclosed that “Cardinal Oddi said, regarding the Third Secret, ‘the Blessed Virgin was alerting us against the apostasy.’ ”

    Ratzinger continued his public ‘novissimi’-genre statements when elevated to the Papacy. For example, papal watchers wondered why as Benedict XVI he selected Cardinal Biffi, a Soloviev scholar, to preach the 2007 Lenten retreat to the Pope and Curia. Cardinal Biffi, is well known for his March 2000 claim, and others, that “the Antichrist would appear after the 20th century” and that “he would call for a world religion via ecumenism, replacing traditional Christianity with an amorphous ‘New Age’ type of spirituality.”

    The Cardinal continued that theme at the 2007 Lenten retreat declaring that “… if Christianity – on opening itself to the world and dialoguing with all – dilutes the salvific event, it closes itself to a personal relationship with Jesus and places itself on the side of the Antichrist.” Pope Benedict XVI thanked Cardinal Biffi saying “I would also like to say ‘thank you’ because you have given us a very acute and precise diagnosis of our situation today.”
    On 12 October 2006, explaining Our Lady’s Fatima warning that “various nations will be annihilated”, Fr. Nicolas Gruner made clear his belief that the whole world will not be annihilated but that the part not annihilated would be enslaved by militant atheists and militant Satanists. (It is arguable that this is precisely the situation today.)

    As Sister Lucy tells us, “ … the devil is in the mood for a final battle and we must choose sides. We are either for the devil or for Jesus and Mary. There is no middle ground.”

    Solange Hertz (+) wrote in ‘Beyond Politics’, “The Pope has absolutely no ‘privilege to personal infallibility’ apart from the Church, but (renegade) Abbe Roca tells us something of the kind will be invoked to impose the new ‘Gospel of social redemption’ on the public at large. Just as the fallen angels followed Lucifer’s personal directives to their damnation and the тαℓмυdic Jҽωs followed the example of Caiphas and Annas against Christ, we can therefore expect the apostates of the latter days to follow the personal directives of the Antichrist in his assault on the Church.”

    “We may be sure, moreover, that his dictates will coincide with men’s sinful inclinations if he is to win worldwide support. Like the unjust steward, “Knowing that he has but a short time” (Apoc 12:12), he will curry favor while he can by offering lavish permissions to all. Under cover of his authorization, wholesale dispensations from God’s laws in the name of religion and human compassion will be granted for the asking. Encouraged to attenuate their relations with God in the same way the debtors in the parable were led to cheat on their accounts, those who accept such favors will automatically labor to uphold an establishment in which they have acquired a vested interest.”

    It appears that the reign of Antichrist approaches. The situation is extremely grave. The Fathers of the Church tell us that this period of history will pose the greatest danger to souls.

    The nominal Catholics of today would also be among the first to accept Antichrist’s claim that he is Our Lord come for the second time, because he will not censure their lax life styles and many of them know little about the authentic Catholic Faith. But once they have submitted to him, he will turn on them: “And the ten horns which thou sawest in the beast: these shall hate the harlot, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and shall burn her with fire” (Apoc. 17:16). Most of the Fathers understand by this passage that Antichrist will destroy the city of Rome.

    And so we come to the False Prophet.

    Before the Antichrist arrives he is preceded by the False Prophet. This Beast from the Earth is described as an infiltrated agent of the Antichrist within the Church, sent to destroy and deceive the Christian faith.

    Fr H. Kramer, in his comprehensive study of the Apocalypse, wrote in ‘The Book of Destiny’, “Though he poses as a lamb, his doctrines betray him for he teaches the doctrine of the dragon”.

    We must remember St. Augustine’s warning, that St. John’s great vision contains things are are repeated in different ways, and are obscure. One the one hand, Scripture tells us, “And I saw another beast coming up out of the earth, and he had two horns, like a lamb, and he spoke as a dragon. And he executed all the power of the former beast in his sight; and he caused the earth, and them that dwell therein, to adore the first beast, whose wound to death was healed. And he did great signs, so that he made also fire to come down from heaven unto the earth in the sight of men. And he seduced them that dwell on the earth, for the signs, which were given him to do in the sight of the beast, saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make the image of the beast, which had the wound by the sword, and lived. And it was given him to give life to the image of the beast, and that the image of the beast should speak; and should cause, that whosoever will not adore the image of the beast, should be slain (Apoc. 13:11-15).”

    But we also read, in Apocalypse 9, “1 And the fifth angel sounded the Tɾυmρet, and I saw a star fall from heaven upon the earth, and there was given to him the key of the bottomless pit. 2 And he opened the bottomless pit: and the smoke of the pit arose, as the smoke of a great furnace; and the sun and the air were darkened with the smoke of the pit. 3 And from the smoke of the pit there came out locusts upon the earth.”

    It is my contention that the second scriptural citation above is more easily understood when considering Jorge Bergoglio as the one who heralds Antichrist.
    We know from St. Ambrose, Tertullian and others that, just as Our Lord had His precursor, St. John the Baptist, who pointed to Him and told the people that this was the Messias, “Behold the Lamb of God . . .”, so also will Antichrist have his false prophet who will make the people worship him. The phrase, “like a lamb,” indicates that he will be an apostate Catholic, probably a priest or bishop. So, as Our Lord’s precursor was a priest of the order of Levi, so Antichrist’s precursor will be a priest of the order of Melchisedech. Exegetes have always taken the reference in Scripture to the stars to refer to the clergy. In this case, “ … a star fall from Heaven upon the earth, and there was given to him the key of the bottomless pit …” must refer to a very senior cleric.

    Jorge Mario Bergoglio

    Various lists of the heresies and errors of Jorge Bergoglio have been compiled by those able to discern and describe them – the Dubia Cardinals, the forty-five theologians, Chris Ferrara and others – while many individuals, clerics and others, notably Archbishop Viganò, have referred to these errors. He has ignored all of them. It is not my purpose to repeat another exhaustive list as these are already easily available, but to make some comments that support the contention that Bergoglio may well be the False Prophet.

    From wherever it comes, it is clear that for Jorge Bergoglio, doctrine is something to be easily set aside when faced by the shades of grey (fifty of them?) that “real life” presents, and that private judgement in the form of “discernment” must take precedence. As a result, he has run a sword through the Church’s moral teaching and consequently its Sacramental teaching has been smashed.

    He seeks to destroy the four marks of the Church.

    Its ONENESS. He wants to take inculturation to new levels, allowing each national Episcopate to determine the translation of the Mass. He even plans to allow these national bodies to determine doctrine. All this destroys not only the Catholicity, the universality of the Church, but the authority of the Holy See.

    Its HOLINESS. Any thriving religious order that has numerous vocations and a bent for Tradition, he ruthlessly destroys. I can think of three at least. New rules which all religious orders must adopt ruin the contemplative element of monasticism, replacing it with “activity”, thus destroying the essence of monasticism. Even Consecrated Virgins no longer need to have ‘bodily integrity”. Holiness for Bergoglio is something to attack, not defend or promote. He clearly has no time for purity. He surrounds himself with, promotes and defends the grossly impure – sơdơmites, the financially corrupt, those who (like himself) have protected the sɛҳuąƖ abusers.

    It’s CATHOLICITY. By constantly referring to the Jesuit mantra of inculturation and the Bugninian adopton of Catholic forms to local usuage, the universality of the Church’s worship are smashed. Though this is not in itself new, with the “Amazonian rite” featuring explicit pagan worship it has been taken to a wholly new level.

    It’s APOSTOLICITY. By promoting to important Bishoprics and Cardinalates the impure, the morally deficient, the sharers of his heresies, he throws out the shepherd and replaces him with the wolf. Is this the mark of a man who loves Christ’s flock? No, it displays a contempt and hatred for the flock and for Christ.

    Who can forget his first appearance on the loggia? I know that very many felt just as I did. It was a golem, a thing of evil, a clay figure, that had stepped out to survey the crowds below with a clear look of triumph, disdain and malice on his face. Take that feeling seriously: so many felt it that it can only have been a global prompting of the Holy Ghost, or of many Guardian Angels.

    There is his indirect claim, made at Fatima, to be the Bishop in white of the released part of the Third Secret. There is the text received by Spanish journalist Jose Maria Zavala, wherein it is written, in Sr. Lucia’s acknowledged handwriting:

    Quote
    “Now I am going to reveal the third fragment of the secret: This part is the apostasy in the Church! Our Lady showed us the individual who I describe as the ‘Holy Father’ in front of a multitude that was cheering him. But there was a difference from a true holy Father, his devilish gaze, this one had the gaze of evil. Then, after some moments we saw the same Pope entering a Church, but this Church was the Church of hell; there is no way to describe the ugliness of that place. It looked like a gray cement fortress with broken angles and windows similar to eyes; it had a beak in the roof of the building. Next, we raised our eyes to Our Lady who said to us: You saw the apostasy in the Church.”
    No-one who has been inside the new basilica in the Fatima shrine, as I have, located directly opposite the orginal, can doubt its ugliness or the accuracy of the description of it given in the above text.

    The reader will also remember that Bergoglio ascribed to Our Lady at the foot of the Cross doubts and anger; that she had been cheated or misled by her Son.

    It is true that Bergoglio has spoken about the devil and hell in an authentically Catholic way, and several times. There is a great dichotomy within this man, who as a young priest (as he writes in his autobiography) delighted in teaching foul language to a young nephew. Is he demonically possessed, or oppressed?

    There are many other sources that could have been used and quoted. Blessed Anne Emmerich, the letter from Sister Lucia to Cardinal Carrafa are two among many.

    What Catholics now face for certain is the unimaginable yet clearly-foretold apostasy which heralds the Antichrist. This is as far as my human reason is able to penetrate the darkness of the present, let alone the future.

    More recent statements made by Bergoglio only serve to substantiate the radical un-Catholicity of the man. His Abu Dhabi prayer house; his statements on (Masonic) brotherhood; his evident aversion to saying Mass at the High Altar of St. Peter’s, below which of course lie the very bones of St. Peter himself; his syncretism, hs indifferentist view of other religions, none of which are deemed to be false; his refusal to seek the conversion of anyone.

    Our Lady

    It is clear from Apocalypse 12 – “the woman clothed with the sun” – that Our Lady has some large role to play at the end of time. In his True Devotion to Mary , Saint Louis Marie de Montfort writes: “It was through Mary that the salvation of the world was begun, and it is through Mary that it will be consummated.” Our Lord in His eschatological discourse spoke of a sign that would immєdιαtely precede His Coming: “And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all tribes of the earth mourn: and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with much power and majesty” (Matthew 24:30).

    Many of the Fathers thought, thinking no doubt of Constantine at the battle of the Milvian Bridge – In hoc signo vinces – that this sign would be the sign of the cross. But the Apocalypse seems to indicate that this sign will be Our Lady: “And a great sign appeared in heaven: A woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars.”

    We must not forget nor ever belittle the authentic apparitions of Our Lady approved by the Church:

    -The miraculous image of Our Lady of Guadalupe, in 1531, where she appears clothed with the sun and the moon under her feet, her name Guadalupe meaning in Aztec, “serpent crusher”.

    -The very important apparitions in Quito, Ecuador, to Mother Mariana de Jesus Torres and the resulting devotion to Our Lady of Good Success.

    -The apparition of Our Lady of Knock, in 1879, which is a tableau from the Apocalypse, a vision of the Church, the Lamb as it were slain standing on the altar, Saint Joseph representing the laity praying, Saint John representing the priesthood preaching, and Our Lady offering all up to God.
    And finally of course, the most famous of them all, Our Lady of Fatima, in 1917, and the miracle of the sun.

    There is great hope then for those who choose the protection of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Final victory has been promised to her and her children by God Almighty. The Holy Ghost, speaking through His servant St. Louis de Montfort, explains that True Devotion to the Blessed Virgin, His Spouse, is ‘especially necessary to the great saints of the latter times’, our times. If you wish to ‘shelter under Her protection’, then, without delay, commence the preparation described by St. Louis which culminates in the Total Consecration to Jesus through Mary. In addition practice the daily recitation of at least one decade of the Holy Rosary and complete the Five First Saturdays as Our Lady requested.

    Some holy men have said that Our Lady was the test of all angels at the beginning. It seems that she will be the test of all men at the end.

    Benedict Carter is a 57-year old English Catholic who lives in Fatima in Portugal. A cradle Traditionalist Catholic, he holds a BA Honours and a Masters degree in History from Cambridge University.

    This entry was posted in Uncategorized on February 23, ARSH 2021 by Ann Barnhardt.



    Online Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 22928
    • Reputation: +12831/-3546
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF
    « Reply #49 on: February 23, 2021, 03:49:55 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!2
  • Quote
    Now I am going to reveal the third fragment of the secret: This part is the apostasy in the Church! Our Lady showed us the individual who I describe as the ‘Holy Father’ in front of a multitude that was cheering him. But there was a difference from a true holy Father, his devilish gaze, this one had the gaze of evil.

    Something like this?  https://www.traditioninaction.org/ʀɛʋօʟutιօnPhotos/A363rcDevilEyesi.html




    That's Benedict XVI.  Do you really believe that this Counterfeit Church described by Emmerick only began during the reign of Bergoglio?

    No, the true Pope in the visions was none other than Pope Gregory VII (Giuseppe Siri).
    Vigano for Pope !!!


    Offline 54rosary

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 375
    • Reputation: +145/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF
    « Reply #50 on: February 24, 2021, 10:44:28 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • Demonic Influence Anyone?

    Video by Louie Verrecchio is approximately 7 minutes long.

    "https://player.vimeo.com/video/326844933"

    Offline 54rosary

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 375
    • Reputation: +145/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF
    « Reply #51 on: February 24, 2021, 12:03:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • In the reply #48 above
    GUEST POST: “The False Prophet – Jorge Bergoglio?” by Benedict Carter
     
    I do not believe that only one decade daily of the ROSARY is a good idea nor a sufficient observance according to the requests made by the BLESSED VIRGIN MARY that the Rosary be prayed daily as the author states in this quote:

    ‘’In addition practice the daily recitation of at least one decade of the Holy Rosary. . .’’

    Offline 54rosary

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 375
    • Reputation: +145/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF
    « Reply #52 on: February 25, 2021, 02:01:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Luther's statue enthroned at the Vatican

    On October 13, 2016, Pope Francis did not offer one single word in public to honor Our Lady of Fatima. Instead, he chose to receive on that very day 1,000 Lutherans in Paul VI Hall at the Vatican.
     
     For the event, he ordered that a statue of Martin Luther be erected on the stage in a place of preeminence so that it could preside over the meeting, above and first two rows below.
     
     Next, he received from the Lutherans a bound copy of the 95 theses with which the heresiarch started his revolt, third row.
     
     During the meeting he wore two scarves on his neck, one yellow, symbolizing the Papacy, and one light blue, representing Lutheranism, The two were tied together to signify the union between the Conciliar Church and the Protestant heresy.
     
     Referring to Luther, Pope Bergoglio said: "The Church's greatest reformers are the saints, in other words the men and women who follow the Word of the Lord and practice it. This is the path we need to take, this is what reforms the church and they are great reformers. They may not be theologians, they may not have studied, they may be humble, but these people's soul is steeped in the Gospel, it's full of it and they are the ones who successfully reform the Church. Both in the Lutheran and Catholic Churches there are saints, men and women with a holy heart who follow the Gospel: they are the Church's reformers."
     
     Aren't these words - spoken in the context of this ceremony to honor the heresiarch - an implicit canonization of Luther? But we wonder whether there is still more to come...
     
     Even if there were nothing else to incriminate the Conciliar Church, is this ceremony not sufficient proof that it has completely apostatized from the Catholic Faith?


    TAKEN FROM- https://www.traditioninaction.org/ʀɛʋօʟutιօnPhotos/A700-Luther.htm






    A reproduction of Luther's face based on his death mask


    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7280
    • Reputation: +490/-263
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF
    « Reply #53 on: February 25, 2021, 03:05:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Something like this?  https://www.traditioninaction.org/ʀɛʋօʟutιօnPhotos/A363rcDevilEyesi.html




    That's Benedict XVI.  Do you really believe that this Counterfeit Church described by Emmerick only began during the reign of Bergoglio?

    No, the true Pope in the visions was none other than Pope Gregory VII (Giuseppe Siri).
    Should read Il Papa Gregory XVII..... :cowboy:
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7280
    • Reputation: +490/-263
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF
    « Reply #54 on: February 25, 2021, 03:06:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Something is askew w/ the quote function.... :confused:
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Offline 54rosary

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 375
    • Reputation: +145/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF
    « Reply #55 on: February 26, 2021, 06:46:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  
    Stickypost: You must buy this AMAZING new book “Benedict XVI: Pope ‘Emeritus’?”


    (Scroll down for new content.  I’m leaving this incredibly important post at the top of the blog for a while.)

    Folks,,  has just been published that I cannot recommend strongly enough.

    Everyone should buy a copy of this book not only for themselves, but also buy copies to distribute, especially to priests.  It is a SYSTEMATIC, COMPREHENSIVE presentation of the dataset regarding the invalidity of Pope Benedict’s putative resignation assembled by a Columbian attorney named Estefanía Acosta. This book is so good and so well done that I am convinced that it is the fruit of the prayers of the faithful.  

    Miss Acosta, born in ARSH 1989, is a native of Medellin, Colombia and has her Masters in Law from the University of Medellin, with her thesis (with honors) being in constitutional law.  She has been an official of the “State Judicial Power” in Colombia, as well as a university professor specializing in the areas of civil and commercial law.  She is a cradle Catholic “revert” desiring to use her education and abilities to defend the rights of God, His Holy Church, and the Papacy.  She has accomplished this goal with the publication of this book.

    The book is divided into three sections.  The first, and most important, is the presentation of the canonically air-tight case that Pope Benedict’s attempted resignation in ARSH 2013 was invalid.  The second section, included for the sake of systematic thoroughness, addresses the faux-conclave of ARSH 2013 and Jorge Bergoglio’s heresy, ties to Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, and non-Catholicity,  but is an historically important record of the infiltration and corruption of the Vatican and College of Cardinals. The Third section is a series of valuable appendices.

    The base premise of the book is that Pope Benedict’s attempted resignation was invalid and that he is and has been the one and only living Vicar of Christ since April ARSH 2005.  It is important to remember that this totally unprecedented Antipapacy is like a gangrenous leg, with the infection up to the knee.  If only the foot is amputated, the gangrene will still be present and kill the victim.  FOCUSING ONLY ON THE FAUX-CONCLAVE of ARSH 2013 and/or Jorge Bergoglio’s heresy/apostasy and NOT the ROOT ISSUE OF THE INVALIDITY OF POPE BENEDICT’S ATTEMPTED RESIGNATION is like amputating only the foot of a gangrenous leg – a futile gesture that will only make the situation worse by enabling the installation of ANOTHER ANTIPOPE.  There WAS NO VALID CONCLAVE in ARSH 2013 to declare null. Jorge Bergoglio is not now and never, ever has been the Pope, and therefore cannot be “deposed” from an office which he has NEVER OCCUPIED.

    The only thing I want to warn readers of is the “clunkiness” of parts of the English translation.  It is totally readable and comprehensible, but it is not the silky-smooth prose of a native English speaker.  That’s okay.  This is no problem at all.  I stand in awe of the sheer amount of work that went into this book and its translations.  As of the initial release right now, it is available in Spanish, Portuguese and English, and is available both as a hefty, high-quality paperback and as an e-book.

    Folks, BUY THIS BOOK. It will go down in history.

    Oh, and as if you needed more encouragement, the 37th and 38th words of the preface are, “Dr. Mazza.” ‘Nuff said.






    CLICK HERE BELOW TO BUY THE BOOK

    This entry was posted in [url=https://www.barnhardt.biz/category/uncategorized/]Uncategorized
    on February 26, ARSH 2021 by Ann Barnhardt.


    Online Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 22928
    • Reputation: +12831/-3546
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF
    « Reply #56 on: February 26, 2021, 07:31:15 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • I get the stuff about Bergoglio.  If he's not a heretic, then there's no such thing as a heretic and never has been.

    But Benedict somehow being the "savior"?  He's just slightly less hereticaler than Bergoglio.

    Kasper the Friendly Ecumenist recently admitted that Bergoglio's theology is no different from that of Ratzinger.

    https://cruxnow.com/vatican/2018/10/kasper-sees-no-substantial-difference-between-benedict-and-francis/

    Quote
    As one of the major protagonists of the Francis papacy — and arguably of the Catholic Church since Vatican II — German Cardinal Walter Kasper argues, “there is no real substantial difference between Pope Benedict and Pope Francis.”

    “They are different personalities of course, different backgrounds,” said Kasper. “One is European, the other comes from Latin America. [But] if you read exactly what they write, it’s the same line and substance.”

    Vigano for Pope !!!

    Offline 54rosary

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 375
    • Reputation: +145/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF
    « Reply #57 on: February 26, 2021, 07:40:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • I get the stuff about Bergoglio.  If he's not a heretic, then there's no such thing as a heretic and never has been.

    But Benedict somehow being the "savior"?  He's just slightly less hereticaler than Bergoglio.

    Kasper the Friendly Ecumenist recently admitted that Bergoglio's theology is no different from that of Ratzinger.

    https://cruxnow.com/vatican/2018/10/kasper-sees-no-substantial-difference-between-benedict-and-francis/
    You are so right, and you made me laugh with your word ''hereticaler''.
    Me thinks that the whole mess is laid out in that bergoglio is not only more hereticaler, but he is also invalidly elected by so many options to choose from.
    However, in the case of Ratzinger, he was validly elected, and so therefore he remains pope.

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5836
    • Reputation: +2760/-491
    • Gender: Female
    Re: BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF
    « Reply #58 on: February 26, 2021, 07:42:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I [Mrs. 54rosary] am not so sure that Nadir is correct.  The fact is that we [Mr. and Mrs. 54rosary]  have been noticing a seemingly increase in the number of  writings and responses on CathInfo that could be identified as prideful, arrogant, and not of good will.  This makes me think that, along with the rest of the world, there is possible infiltration as the cause.

    There was a great deal of the prideful, arrogant, and ill will associated with a down thumbing toward RomanCatholic1953 that was totally uncalled for.

    It is one thing to down thumb and another to do it in the wrong situation such as here regarding the one in this post pursuant to the Blessed Virgin's plan for us and also against RomanCatholic as was the case.  It all matters for sure.  

    We prayed for the poor souls who down thumbed here and will pray again.  Generally, we pray for all those on CathInfo and their families as well.

    It would have been a good idea that the person would reply that the problem was the block letters and wide spacing.  In any case such as that down thumbed reply in this post being discussed , I wish that I could always spread certain beautiful messages in BIG LETTERS.

    For the record, a good deal of the time I write my postings/responses on word, and when I copy and paste them on CathInfo, the words enlarge, the spacing is different, and other various anomalies happen that are not the same as the original writing that I did.    

    In addition, we are not aware of the recent thread about this topic of sizes of letters, etc. because we do not follow every thread because of the time that this would take.

    Also, I enjoy writing in various styles, colors, and sizes.  If there is something wrong with this in the ideas and minds of some, I am very surprised.
    I wrote that thread.  Although I did not downthumb you, I will tell you I will not read such eyesores from any poster regardless of the topic...especially the long ones.  There is no reason why you can't re-size things before posting.  Regarding length, I also wonder why posters can't give a synopsis and just post a link.    
    "For there is not any thing secret that shall not be made manifest, nor hidden, that shall not be known and come abroad."- Luke 8:17

    Offline 54rosary

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 375
    • Reputation: +145/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF
    « Reply #59 on: February 26, 2021, 07:58:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I wrote that thread.  Although I did not downthumb you, I will tell you I will not read such eyesores from any poster regardless of the topic.  There is no reason why you can't re-size things before posting.  
    Dear 2Vermont,
    There are plenty of reasons why I can't resize. Sometimes I am unable to do so when I do want to resize whether you believe it or not.  I am not a liar.

    In addition, honest people can have honest points of view which is why I love reading the viewpoints of people on CathInfo for the most part.
    You have exceeded your honesty by trying now to dictate your preferences in an attempt to place yourself above others in importance.
    You can easily skip over any posts or every post if you choose.  Humble yourself this way, or not as you want.
    Either way,   I am very certain that I do not care to argue with you further about this subject.

    As a sidenote, I rarely downthumb because I prefer to not do so for various reasons.  So, if you receive a downthumb, you can be reasonably assured that it is not me.  I always expect a downthumb when I write here, but that is not so big of a deal that it stops me anyhow.  


     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16