Okay. Bernardin was the American satanist who was shot straight to the top of the American church and decided who was elevated to the episcopacy in the US from the late 1960s until his death in ARSH 1996.

Bernardin was the man depicted in the opening chapter of Malachi Martin’s “Windswept House” who co-presided with Bishop John Russell over the black Mass in South Carolina that was performed concurrently with a black Mass in the Pauline Chapel inside the Vatican to “enthrone satan” in the late 1950s. The child who was raped in the South Carolina black Mass, “Agnes”, corresponded with me in ARSH 2014 and confirmed that Bernardin co-presided over the South Carolina black Mass and raped her at the “consecration” equivalent. Agnes’ father was a satanist in South Carolina and provided her to the coven and was present when she was ritually raped.

Bernardin has been recruited by satanists out of the gαy bar scene in Charleston when he was a pre-med undergrad at USC. The satanists placed him into seminary and saw to it that he shot straight to the top of the American church. Bernardin was made a bishop at age 38, and at age 40 was the head of the US bishops’ conference, a position of power which he retained until his death, and his coven of protégées still control to this day.

Bernardin was a key supporter of Saul Alinsky, and Bernardin paid for Barack σbαmα (Barry Soetoro) to be brought to Chicago and be trained in Alinskyism.

Read my piece from ARSH 2012, “The Bernardin-Alinsky-σbαmα Nexus” here.

Antipope Bergoglio has worn a creepy pectoral Cross with Christ (?) depicted with arms crossed since his elevation in Buenos Aires. On the left is Bergoglio before usurping the Petrine See, and on the right is after the usurpation, with a new silver version of the same Cross:


It is thought that this is actually a satanic icon, rooted in “Osiris”, and that the odd “dove” at the top is actually a goat head with horns, stylized so as to be claimed to be “a dove”. The face of the man looks like an evil death mask.

Not coincidentally, in December of ARSH 2019, a Pachamama worship ritual was performed at a televised Vatican “Christmas concert”, led by an Amazonian witch. These were the last days before the global putsch of the CÖVÌD political religion and the global interdict of the Catholic Church. This screen cap is literally of the Pachamama worship ritual inside the Paul VI hall inside the Vatican:

But here’s the new info, sent in by an eagle-eyed reader. This pectoral cross that Antipope Bergoglio wears is EXACTLY the same as that worn by the Satanist Cardinal Bernardin:


Interestingly, Wilton Gregory, the black sơdơmite hand-picked by the fαɢɢօt Cardinal Donald Wuerl, himself a protégée of Uncle Ted McCarrick, to replace Wuerl in Washington DC, was Bernardin’s protégée (and assumed sơdơmy partner.) Here is a picture of the known satanist and child rapist Bernardin consecrating Wilton Gregory a Bishop at age 36, on Halloween ARSH 1983, and a picture of Gregory serving Bernardin’s Mass. You can see the edge of Bernardin’s pectoral Cross. Given Wilton Gregory’s flaming ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity and intimate connection with Bernardin, it is not at all unreasonable to suspect Wilton Gregory of being connected to Satanism. Which makes him just perfect to be the Cardinal Archbishop of Washington DC.



This entry was posted in Uncategorized on February 10, ARSH 2021 by Ann Barnhardt.

It seems obvious that Bergoglio's pectoral cross is nearly identical to that of Bernardin, a known Satanist.

Nevertheless, the arms being crossed appears to be a function of Jesus(?) holding a sheep over his shoulder (there are more sheep in the background).



We can't rule it out, but I wouldn't call the image proof of anything.  Far more disturbing is the fact that Bergoglio's cross is identical to that of Bernardin ... a known Satanist, sơdơmite, and rapist.

The topic is BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP-PROOF

It is a general topic to which others will possibly provide their own proof that BERGOGLIO'S A CREEP?

I also want to add that the arms being crossed have a particular memory from our Novus Ordo days
in which the one who did not wish to receive the Holy Eucharist at Mass for diverse reasons would
none the less go up in line to the priest or extraordinary minister with our arms crossed instead of
remaining kneeling while not going up at all.  

I do not know if there is any significance or not to this, but in life all things have meaning including the
pictures of the crossed arms in the above posts as are here pertaining to Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.  

Also,  I want to add that on the image of the person on the pectoral cross, it occurs to me that there is a phallic symbol on the person in the middle of the garment and also fingers on a hand.

The implications of this are obvious as the design of the cross was purposely manufactured as such.

Also,  I want to add that on the image of the person on the pectoral cross, it occurs to me that there is a phallic symbol on the person in the middle of the garment and also fingers on a hand.

The implications of this are obvious as the design of the cross was purposely manufactured as such.

I cannot say with moral certitude that you are wrong about this particular item, but it seems to me, that making this connection is just a bit far-fetched.  It is the kind of thing one (not you) would almost have to be trying to find.

The "King of Glory" cross out in Oklahoma a few years ago was far more offensive, but they claim it was just abdominal muscles, not, ahem, that other thing.

I should have been reluctant to state this observation at first because it obviously puts me out there for ridicule;  but I also showed it to someone else who confirmed that it was there.  I could absolutely be wrong, but I do not think so at this time.

Also, I should have been prepared and should have expected it to be explained away by others here, there, or anywhere;  however, it was not that way.

I am not familiar with the "King of Glory" cross in any way.

I was not ridiculing you.  You might be right.  But for myself, I just don't see it, or rather, I wouldn't see it, unless it had been brought up to me.  Even then, I think it's a bit of a stretch, but maybe that's just me.  Again, you may be right.

The "King of Glory" cross was a one-dimensional crucifix in Oklahoma, and some people thought the abdomen looked like the male members in their fullest state.  Again, it's the kind of thing that, once someone calls it to your attention, you can't "unsee" it.  Once the furor reached a certain point, the crucifix was replaced with a rendition that could not possibly be interpreted that way.  I shall not provide a link, much less a picture, but interested readers can search for it online.

I was not ridiculing you.

The "King of Glory" cross was a one-dimensional crucifix in Oklahoma, and some people thought the abdomen looked like the male members in their fullest state.  Again, it's the kind of thing that, once someone calls it to your attention, you can't "unsee" it.  Once the furor reached a certain point, the crucifix was replaced with a rendition that could not possibly be interpreted that way.  I shall not provide a link, much less a picture, but interested readers can search for it online.

I was not referring to you that you were ridiculing me because you definitely were not.

Thank you for the info. on the ''King of Glory'' cross.

https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholicchurch/john-paul-ii-bestows-the-pectoral-cross-upon-rowan-williams/

https://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/c031_Cross.htm