I've been doing a lot of reflection on the proposed upcoming consecration by Bergoglio and (some / most?) of the world's "bishops".

Our Blessed Mother, in 1929 at Tuy, stated that the intention of the consecration would be to make reparation for blasphemies committed against her.  Notice that Our Blessed Mother is not focused on herself, as in "oh poor me, so blasphemed".  She says that she asks for it due to her compassion for all those souls whom God condemns to hell for blasphemies against her.  She is moved by love for the blasphemers and pity for their damnation and not by the offense against her.  As to be expected of the Immaculate Heart of Our Mother.

This is the moment when God asks the Holy Father to make, in union with all the bishops of the world, the consecration of Russia to my Immaculate Heart.

He promises to save it by that means. So many are the souls which the justice of God condemns for sins committed against me that I come to ask for reparation. Sacrifice yourself for this intention and pray.”

Our Lady's is upset about the blasphemies not on her own account but out of compassion for the souls being lost as a result.

So now we have the text of the Bergoglian consecration.  NOT ONE WORD (in that voluminous 5-page Modernist logorrhea) about making reparation for blasphemies against Our Blessed Mother.  Not one word at all about blasphemies against Our Lord or God the Father.  Not one word about all the sins of the world ... except about people fighting with eachother and, the audactiy!, harming the environment.

Bergoglio's prayer is not an act of reparation but is merely a petition for peace.  It doesn't consecrate Russia, but, rather, humanity with a shout-out to Russia ... and Ukraine.

But here's where it becomes an Anti-Consecration.  To what end does Bergoglio want to have peace?  Bergoglio wants there to be peace to insure the freedom to blaspheme and the freedom to sin.  He promotes Religious Liberty including the freedom to worship Pachamama in peace, to practice idolatry. Bergoglio wants the world to be safe for sodomy and for all manner of sin and perversion.  He's not seeking a peace under the Kingship of Christ, but the kind of peace over which Satan rules.  This is an Anti-Consecration.

Will this be the fulfillment of Sacred Scripture which says that they will say "peace, peace ... but there will be no peace"? (prophet Jeremiah)

Bergoglio is not petitioning Our Lady for the peace of Christ the King but for the peace of Satan (his freedom to destroy souls and spread error and sin and perversion).  Our Lord said He came not to bring peace, but the sword.

Verrecchio put out an article that we should join with the voices "crying out to Our Lady".  For shame, Louie, for shame.  Here's the analogy in terms of "crying out".  In various movies about the Passion of Our Lord, you have the seen where Pilate offers either Jesus or Barrabas, and the entire crowd yells Barrabas.  Meanwhile, you have a few isolated voices crying out for Jesus, and the camera pans in on them, but they are drowned out.  To join our voices with this consecration is to be shouting for Barrabas, for the anti-peace of the Antichrist, the victory of Globohomo to continue destroying humanity.  NO!, we are shouting for Jesus.  And we should make our own Anti-anti-consecration, properly consecrating our families in reparation not only for the blasphemies committed against her but also for the extreme insult of this Anti-consecration by Bergoglio, which simply layers another blasphemy on top of all the rest (including Bergoglio's own blasphemies againt Our Lady), the blasphemy of asking Our Blessed Mother to bring a Satanic and godless peace that would allow the destroyer of souls to continue spreading error, sin, and blasphemy.

Those "crying out" desire peace, not so the world might together worship Christ the King, but so they can continue living their lives of hedonism with plentiful material goods and pleasures (and low gas prices) and the freedom to sin.  That is precisely why God will chastise the world, to take away their freedom to commit many of their sins, as an act of Mercy on the world to bring an end to the very thing that Bergoglio is asking Our Lady for.

God could very well punish the world severely for this mockery of Our Lady, and our own properly-done consecration would bring us her protection against whatever terrible chastisement awaits as a result of this.

new-rome already said Fatima was fulfilled in 1984, so while they are implying this is related to Fatima, it’s really not.  It’s just another general consecration, no different than 84.  And it will have similar, general, short term effects.  

new-rome already said Fatima was fulfilled in 1984, so while they are implying this is related to Fatima, it’s really not.  It’s just another general consecration, no different than 84.  And it will have similar, general, short term effects. 

See, I don't even believe that the 1991 "Fall of the Iron Curtain" was real.  I believe that Golitsyn was telling the truth about the "Perestroika Deception".  Similarly, we could have some staged "miraculous" end of the Russian incursion as well ... if God allows it.

The true chastisement we Trads live through (and it’s getting worse) is the disharmony in Tradition.  If Our Lady appeared to some 8 yr old and asked them to spread the message that She would like all Trad bishops and priests to consecrate Russia instead, it wouldn’t happen.  Too much bickering and pride. This is the true tragedy.  

Who exactly has a true fear of God these days? I doubt there's many even among rad trads. I know I don't have the fear of God I should because things are still too comfortable. So let the Hand of God drop, cast us into discomfort and see who is really zealous and aligned with the Divine Will.

With God, though, we know that everything He "does" (aka "is") is at once a perfect act of Mercy and of Justice.  God's chastisement will be a great mercy.  Every time there's some traumatic event, people suddenly "find God" and return to the churches, etc.  Probably the greatest punishment is His having let this crisis go on without intervening.  It's like a parent who, after trying everything to correct his children, finally just says, "Fine.  You do what you want, since you won't respond to my efforts."

This notion of God being patient and patient and patient and then suddenly "snapping" is very anthropomorphic, presented to us so that we can understand it from a quoad nos perspective.  God doesn't just lose His temper (He has none to lose) after He's been pushed so far.  He is and He is always the same, unchanging, perfect in every respect.  I believe it's like that with souls in Hell.  They suffer and burn because they have so disposed themselves that the love of God and perfections of God cause them intense suffering.

There was a Church Father who made the following analogy to describe prayer.  There was a guy in a boat who had a fishing line.  So at one point he hooks something, and he starts drawing it in.  It gets closer and closer, but then he finally see it.  He had snagged a large boulder with his line, and instead of pulling the boulder closer, the entire time he was pulling the boat closer to the boulder.  When we pray, we don't "bend" the will of God to our will.  We bend our will to God's. 

The true chastisement we Trads live through (and it’s getting worse) is the disharmony in Tradition.  If Our Lady appeared to some 8 yr old and asked them to spread the message that She would like all Trad bishops and priests to consecrate Russia instead, it wouldn’t happen.  Too much bickering and pride. This is the true tragedy. 

Maybe if all Trad bishops and priests did get together to offer their own consecration of Russia it might make some reparation for the upcoming "consecration". Also maybe have Apb. Vigano join them  

Maybe if all Trad bishops and priests did get together to offer their own consecration of Russia it might make some reparation for the upcoming "consecration". Also maybe have Apb. Vigano join them 

That would be awesome.  I'm sure the neo-SSPX would join the Bergoglian consecration rather than that of these Traditional bishops.

A "bοοster shοt" since it didn't work the first several times.  Or the "good effects" wore off. 

Lol much like the world these days, neo-church gets by simply kicking the can down the road