Decem,
Your problem is you are elevating your view above prior, church-approved views. The Church Fathers are unanimous/doctrinal on many things related to the Apocalypse, one of which is that the antichrist will rule for 3.5 years, which is what Daniel refers to. This is doctrine. If you reject this, then you're a protestant.
Now...if you want to say that your view is an ADDITIONAL symbolic meaning, related to our times vs the antichrist times (which are distinct periods), then go ahead. I think some verses in the Apocalypse are viewed by the saints as having 5,6, even 7 various interpretations. But...they all have a primary interpretation which the Church has, through the Church Fathers, told us.
The point being, Daniel relates to the times of the antichrist, so your novus ordo view is not the primary meaning of these verses. Because we know, infallibly, that the antichrist will stop the sacrifice for a time, during his 3.5 year reign. Since the antichrist isn't on the scene, then it cant apply to the novus ordo.