He's clearly not read the book and is interpreting interpretations of it. It looks like he's trying to "burp" or something every sentence or so, so this one is hard to watch for that reason.
One excerpt tha he did show from the book. Plus he use the "sin promoted by James Martin" as a euphemism for sodomy about a dozen times, which is really annoying, and then a dozen words to define instead of use the term "pornographic" used by Ratzinger.
Ratzinger:
Perhaps it is worth mentioning the fact that, in not a few seminaries, students caught reading my books were considered unfit for the priesthood. My books were concealed as harmful literature and were read only in secret, so to speak?

No such thing ever happend. So he's spinning his books as great ultra-orthodox defenses of the Faith? They're absoultely filled with heresy. Really, the only seminaries where his books would be considered "harmful literature" would be Traditional seminaries.
There's another quote about Ratzinger complaining about the quality of seminaries, gαy clubs there, and pornography. Uhm, you were the "Pope" for nearly 8 years. Why didn't you do anything about it?
How is this some kind of "bombshell"? There's nothing there.