Coup D'Etat:The Forced Resignation of Benedict XVI
Friends, Jorge Bergoglio aka Francis, the Great Pretender, who has bewitched you to think he is the Pope...is in fact not the real Pope! The explanation is simple: Benedict XVI did not resign of his own free will.[1] (http://file:///C:/Users/amor320/Docuмents/antipope_francis%203.docx#_ftn1)He was threatened—The St. Gallen Mafia threatened to αssαssιnαtҽ him (by poisoning) if he did not resign within a year, that is by February 12, 2013. This was a group of Marxist ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ Cardinals and Bishops who colluded to stack the deck against Cardinal Ratzinger from becoming the pope. They did not want Benedict to get elected in 2005, so they formed this group that met once a year in a small city in Switzerland called Sankt Gallen. This group of thirty Cardinals tried to block Pope Benedict from being elected in favor of their own candidate whom they had chosen, Jorge Bergoglio, who was a Marxist ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ modernist like themselves. They failed in 2005, but they succeeded in forcing his resignation in 2013.
The whole sordid story began when Pope Benedict established a Commission to investigate leaks of reserved and confidential docuмents to the news media (what later became known as the famous VatiLeaks scandal).
According to Jose Alberto Villasana, [2] (http://file:///C:/Users/amor320/Docuмents/antipope_francis%203.docx#_ftn2)a canon lawyer, a theologian, and an advisor to the secretary for external relations between the Vatican and Mexico, it was not the Pope’s butler who leaked the Vatican docuмents but a personage who called himself “The Crow”, who is later discovered to be none other than the Dean of the College of Cardinals Angelo Cardinal Sodano. One of the secret docuмents of this dossier was the dire warning of a planned assassination against Pope Benedict. This plot was made public by Cardinal Paolo Romeo, the Archbishop of Palermo in Sicily, while on a visit to China in November 2011.
Pope Benedict XVI took this threat very seriously and formed a commission of three Cardinals to investigate where this threat had come from and if it was real, that is to say, whether he had to take it seriously. After a six month investigation, the commission reported back to the pope that the threat was indeed very real. That is when he decided to resign.
For fear of being exposed as the instigators of this plot, the partisans of Jorge Bergoglio deliver an ultimatum to Benedict that:
1) he must abdicate the chair of Peter within a year—that is by February 12th, 2013, or he will be αssαssιnαtҽd.
2) He must not publish the dossier of the Commission's findings.
3) And he must not disclose anything of his forced resignation, and he must continue to affirm that he resigned freely.
Benedict acceded to their request but leaves a trail of clues (of breadcrumbs, like in the Hansel and Gretel story) that he was coerced to resign. Below is his letter of resignation.
Dear Brothers,
I have convoked you to this Consistory, not only for the three canonizations but also to communicate to you a decision of great importance for the life of the Church. After having repeatedly examined my conscience before God, I have come to the certainty that my strengths, due to an advanced age, are no longer suited to an adequate exercise of the Petrine ministry. I am well aware that this ministry, due to its essential spiritual nature, must be carried out not only with words and deeds, but no less with prayer and suffering. However, in today’s world, subject to so many rapid changes and shaken by questions of deep relevance for the life of faith, in order to govern the bark of Saint Peter and proclaim the Gospel, both strength of mind and body are necessary, strength which in the last few months, has deteriorated in me to the extent that I have had to recognize my incapacity to adequately fulfill the ministry entrusted to me. For this reason, and well aware of the seriousness of this act, with full freedom I declare that I renounce the ministry of Bishop of Rome, Successor of Saint Peter, entrusted to me by the Cardinals on 19 April 2005, in such a way, that as from 28 February 2013, at 20:00 hours, the See of Rome, the See of Saint Peter, will be vacant and a Conclave to elect the new Supreme Pontiff will have to be convoked by those whose competence it is.
Dear Brothers, I thank you most sincerely for all the love and work with which you have supported me in my ministry and I ask pardon for all my defects. And now, let us entrust the Holy Church to the care of Our Supreme Pastor, Our Lord Jesus Christ, and implore his holy Mother Mary, so that she may assist the Cardinal Fathers with her maternal solicitude, in electing a new Supreme Pontiff. With regard to myself, I wish to also devotedly serve the Holy Church of God in the future through a life dedicated to prayer.
From the Vatican, 10 February 2013
BENEDICTUS PP XVI
Here is my comment on this resignation: he renounces only the ministry of Bishop of Rome!
On February 11th, 2013, Benedict turns over only the Petrine ministry but not the munus, the papal office to his successor-to-be. He retains his title of Successor of St. Peter and concedes the title of Supreme Pontiff to the other. He calls for a Conclave to elect a new Supreme Pontiff. With this act, Benedict sends a warning to the Catholic world that his resignation is forced, and therefore invalid. He also spices up the Latin text with several errors to highlight the glaring fact that he is not acting freely.
On February 28th, alarmed that his signs (bread crumbs) are not being heeded and that he has no friends in the Vatican, repeats that he is only surrendering the ministry and not the Petrine office. He then decides to fly to Castel Gandolfo where he hopes to be rescued by Catholic forces in order to stop the resignation outcome. Jorge Bergoglio realizes that Benedict is too dangerous to leave him at Castel Gandolfo, so he forces Benedict's return to the Vatican as his prisoner.
You may be shocked to know that Pope— so-called “Pope” Francis — does not even believe in the real Christian God. [3] (http://file:///C:/Users/amor320/Docuмents/antipope_francis%203.docx#_ftn3) He believes God is a force in the universe. Like Father Paul Kramer says, he's a “Pandeist”. He believes in a mixture of Theism and Deism, but not the real Christian God, not the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, not God the father of Jesus Christ, His only Son.
Pope Francis was eventually put in because they threatened Benedict's life and so he partially resigned but not fully, so his resignation is invalid. He only resigned the administrative part of the papacy, but he kept the munus, which is just a Latin word for the papal office, which he retained, like the prayerful part of the papacy. That's why he's dressed in white; that's why he wears the papal ring; that's why he goes by the name of Benedict XVI.
[1] (http://file:///C:/Users/amor320/Docuмents/antipope_francis%203.docx#_ftnref1)The Imprisonment of Pope Benedict XVI https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2019/07/08/the-imprisonment-of-pope-benedict-xvi/ (https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2019/07/08/the-imprisonment-of-pope-benedict-xvi/)
The Anti-Benedict Conspiracy by ROD DREHER (https://www.theamericanconservative.com/author/rod-dreher) • September 25, 2015 (https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/the-anti-benedict-conspiracy/)
[2] (http://file:///C:/Users/amor320/Docuмents/antipope_francis%203.docx#_ftnref2)Hypothesis on the Resignation of Pope Benedict XVI http://www.traditionalcatholicpriest.com/2019/04/04/resignation/
[3] (http://file:///C:/Users/amor320/Docuмents/antipope_francis%203.docx#_ftnref3)Why this Catholic priest Paul Kramer does not think Pope Francis is the true pope. https://gloria.tv/article/2cT4DpYn94DW3JJEGZyLZ4NFs
More voices are rising:
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2020/01/de-mattei-real-mess-is-cohabitation-of.html?m=1 (https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2020/01/de-mattei-real-mess-is-cohabitation-of.html?m=1)
From this situation, there emerges, however, a much greater mess, which is that of the unnatural cohabitation of two Popes in the Vatican, above all when one of them, Benedict XVI, after renouncing the papacy, maintains the name, continues to wear white, imparts his Apostolic Blessing that only the Pope should do, and once again breaks his silence which he had vowed to keep by resigning. In short, he considers himself Pope, even if “emeritus”.
This situation is the consequence of a grave theological error by Cardinal Ratzinger. By keeping the title Pope emeritus, as happens with bishops, he appears to believe that the rise to the Papacy imprints an indelible mark similar to that of the priesthood. In reality, the sacramental grades of the priesthood are three only: the diaconate, the priesthood and the episcopacy. The Papacy belongs to another hierarchy in the Church, the jurisdictional one, or the governmental one, wherein it is the apex. When a Pope is elected, he receives the office of supreme jurisdiction, not a sacrament with an indelible mark.
The priesthood can’t even be lost by death, because it subsists “in aternum” . The papacy, on the other hand, can be lost, not only by death, but also in the case of voluntary renunciation or of manifest, notorious heresy. If he renounces being pontiff, the Pope ceases to be such: he has no right to wear white nor impart the Apostolic Blessing. He, from a canonical point of view, is no longer even a cardinal, but goes back to being a simple bishop. Unless his renunciation is invalid: but this, in the case of Benedict XVI, should be proven. Effectively, the title of Pope today is being given to both Francis and Benedict, but one is certainly abusive, as only one [man] can be Pope in the Church.