Even if he wanted to reveal what was really happening or wanted to confess the truth to the Church, he was handled so closely for so long that it really was never was a possibility. I pray that he was relieved of his burdens in confession and no longer personally participated in the modernist destruction of the Church. Jesus Mercy on his soul.

Well said and nicely stated. 

I'll offer prayers for him.

I don't see how a person can spend over 50 years of their life spouting heresy after heresy, promoting pedophiles and freemasons, being completely passive to breathtaking amounts of corruption, to just say oops! sorry about all that Lord in their final hours.
It requires a devotion to evil that you only find in the hearts of communist dictators and serial killers.

If he had a true Papacy (which I am inclined NOT to believe) the grace of the Papacy can and will change a man. It did for Pius lX. Praying for the best for his soul.

Ann Barnhardt | Barnhardt

Apparently, she really is a moron.  Her own readers are pointing out to her that she has now embraced sedevacantism, and her response is that they are evil?

She says that it’s too obvious to have to explain why they’re wrong. 



We’re now in an interregnum, but nobody is organizing a conclave.

And when inevitably one is organized after Francis dies, they’ll have to not recognize it as legitimate, since it will be comprised of fake cardinals (Francis appointed over 50% of the eligible electors).

Witness the results of financial advisors toying with theology.

And what the hell is with her made up ARSH dating acronym?  It’s like she wants to be the kid who made up a trendy new word.

Woman, shut up already!

That's pretty much the long and short of it.  Although given our particular judgments are immediate, it has already been judged.

Technically yes, but is the efficacy of prayer limited to the time it’s offered?  Couldn’t God use prayer for someone after their death and apply it to give them the grace to repent before they died, if that makes sense?

Apparently, she really is a moron.  Her own readers are pointing out to her that she has now embraced sedevacantism, and her response is that they are evil?

She says that it’s too obvious to have to explain why they’re wrong. 



We’re now in an interregnum, but nobody is organizing a conclave.

And when inevitable one is organized after Francis dies, they’ll have to not recognize it as legitimate, since it will be comprised of fake cardinals (Francis appointed over 50% of the eligible electors).

Witness the results of financial advisors toying with theology.

And what the hell is with her made up ARSH dating acronym?  It’s like she wants to be the kid who made up a trendy new word.

Woman, shut up already!

Yes- she can be exasperatingly obnoxious, I wonder about her intricate knowledge on narcissism, hmmm. I do read her blog because she has been very helpful in the past regarding COVID/ Ivermectin and does have some legitimate insights, but all in all, she is too insistent on this particular issue, and has totally discounted any independent (valid) Trad Catholic movement as schismatic, even in light of Francis.
I think she has loosened up on the SSPX, however.

Did he have a choice? Probably not able to make one

That sounds like the "did he have a choice with respect to his resignation?".

We always have a choice.  And if he converted and repented, he would refuse to participate in the NO.  They were also reporting he was "lucid and alert".  Of course, we don't know if the reports are accurate.