Author Topic: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc (Read 303605 times)

MiracleOfTheSun · « **Reply #785 on:** **Yesterday** at 09:56:37 PM »

I recently read Bella Dodd's School of Darkness and when she started seeing the holes in Communism the party created a non-stop smear campaign against her. And she had been an important figure in the movement. The continuing, non-stop smear campaign against +Thuc for doing the consecrations and declaring the See vacant is right in line with that Kommie model (and the murder of his family by them). Mindszenty was also marginalized and dropped like a rock by Pope Saint Paul VI after resisting Communism. Very interesting similarities.

Persto · « **Reply #786 on:** **Today** at 10:35:23 AM »

From the transcription of the video: Mark 24:00

Bishop Zamora's Response to the Alleged Carthage Renunciation Letter of Abp. Thuc

"However, in a letter dated April 12, 1985, Monsignor Zamora refuted this false statement, writing: "It is true that the current hierarchs of the new church have lost their standing as witnesses to the truth, as a result of their drifting away from the True Faith. I state this firmly, knowing full well that they constantly lie in public—as in the case of the declaration by Monsignor Thuc proclaimed by progressive clergy, in which his retraction appears, and in the case of reports published in an Acapulco newspaper with very prominent headlines, where they also lie publicly."

"Later, I learned that they had rehabilitated Monsignor Thuc. The Vatican stated that he had formally retracted his position. They subjected him to a degree of secret surveillance, and tried to lure him to the Vatican in various ways, attempting to isolate him so that he would not consecrate other bishops. It was as if the city itself were his prison—or worse."

"Monsignor Thuc himself once revealed to us in Munich that the local bishop had invited him to concelebrate Mass in the cathedral on a Thursday, and he accepted the invitation the Eastern courtesy to which he was accustomed, but he did not pronounce the words of consecration. He pronounced the words of the Latin formula he had always used; he did not do so on several occasions—or frequently, as his detractors claim—but his declaration was sincere, and we have we accepted with pleasure; we thanked him for revealing such important information to us, and we are convinced of his episcopal sincerity."

"If he committed a scandalous sin, it was a transgression and not a crime, as his detractors claim; first of all, Monsignor Thuc was not suspected of heresy for having participated in a non-Catholic act of worship with the intention of becoming a progressive heretic; indeed, according to Canon 1258, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the 1917 Code of Canon Law, the faithful are not permitted to attend actively or to take part in any way in non-Catholic sacred rites; passive or merely material presence at the ceremonies of a heterodox form of worship may be tolerated for reasons of courtesy or social obligation; this reason must be serious, and in cases of doubt, submitted to the judgment of the Ordinary; it is thus permitted to attend the funerals and weddings of non-Catholics, as well as similar solemn occasions, provided that any danger of perversion or scandal is avoided."

"I continue reading the text by Monsignor Zamora: "His (+Thuc) conservative stance speaks in his favor from the outset. Moreover, it seems very strange to me that he was rehabilitated by the Vatican at his own personal request; so much has been said against him, just as were said against us regarding Archbishop Thuc. He died on December 13, 1984, and as you surely know, progressives in the Vatican and elsewhere in America widely published a retraction attributed to Archbishop Thuc. I read it and immediately realized it was fake because of the style in which it was written; it was neither Archbishop Thuc's style nor that of any other Catholic bishop, but rather a progressive style. Almost immediately, the newspaper *Novedades* of Acapulco published a rehash of the story and added that Archbishop Thuc had written to Archbishop Carmona asking him to retract as well. That letter is obviously fake; Archbishop Carmona stated that he never received any such letter, and that even if he had, he would have disregarded it because Archbishop Thuc was in the hands of his captors—who were progressive priests. From January to December 1984, Archbishop Thuc never bowed to the Vatican, unlike Archbishop Lefebvre. The circuмstances of Archbishop Thuc's death following his abduction warrant a lengthy commentary due to the two apocryphal docuмents attributed to him by his captors."

"One clearly sees the mafia-like methods of the Conciliar sect. So, to all of you listening to us—brothers—pay close attention to all the... ...lies that people choose to tell you about Archbishop Thuc, for that matter-because—well, although many haven't heard of it, since—we have to admit—it is essentially a topic for "insiders," so to speak, as soon as one starts digging into the question of Sedevacantism, there’s always some busybody showing up somewhere with their share of slander—yeah, for sure. "

Incredulous · « **Reply #787 on:** **Today** at 11:30:18 AM »

Archbishop Thuc had a distinct writing style that was both interesting and eloquent.

JPII's jewChurch operatives who kidnapped and murdered the Archbishop were essentially gang thugs.

And the fake retraction was created by Consiliar henchmen who lacked any sophistication in the dark art of forgery.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc (Read 303605 times)

MiracleOfTheSun

Re: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc

Persto

Re: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc

Incredulous

Re: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc