CathInfo.com

We dont even know that is true or not. Dogmatic sedes are terrible for spreading lies.

And clearly they are not the same nature. The first batch of consecrations Thuc chose to do he simulated! A crime meriting death. My goodness, compare that to the level of preparation that went into 1988, and you realize how crazy it is to compare the two men.

https://www.cathinfo.com/th
e-library/1976-abp-lefebvre-letter-and-abp-thuc-chart/
From Fr. Wathen's files:

Fr. Wathen's Testimony:
This is an important docuмent because it was written around the time that Abp. Thuc died.  Some of the most important statements are:

-Both Popes PXI and PXII gave Abp. Thuc authority to ordain Bishops and priests without a papal mandate, and these extraordinary faculties were never withdrawn.

-There is no clear evidence of Abp. Thuc "recanting" after the Palmar de Troya consecrations when he was "excommunicated" by the Vatican.

-Abp. Thuc repudiated Clemente and his followers when he declared himself pope after the death of PVI.

-The Vatican falsely claimed Abp. Thuc recanted before his death, making the earlier claim also doubtful.  There was no signiture on the supposed recantation docuмent of the Vatican.

-Abp. Thuc consecrated 6 more bishops and declared the state of Sede Vacante.  He preserved the Apostolic line in this time of crisis after Vatican 2.

-Abp. Thuc died in a Novus Ordo Vietnamese seminary under mysterious circuмstances, only months after he had apparently been abducted from a Traditional seminary in New York.  He was only located due to an investigation of the FBI.  Before he could be interviewed he died - cause of death not clear.