But there isn't doubt.
I am only saying that IF there were, it still wouldnt be convincing compared to Thucs insanity.
“Convincing” isn’t relevant. Thats your problem. You’re self-interpreting what “doubt” means TO YOU, which is not what canon law says. We’re not taking about personal doubt, but OBJECTIVE DOUBT, based on OBJECTIVE FACTS.
There can be OBJECTIVE FACTS which cause doubt, even if YOU aren’t convinced, because it doesn’t matter what YOU think. It only matters what FACTS exist.
You’re so lost it’s amazing.