I studied Protestant Guy (PG) and Smelly Butler today.  I discovered a number of problems with them.  I think they may be responsible for the rise of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ beginning in the 18th Century.  

You've effectively articulated nominalism.

I am not even going to bother getting source material. It reminds me of the early Humanists and of Martin Luther who absolutely abhorred Scholasticism, Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas.

St. Thomas Aquinas wrote the liturgy for Corpus Christi when Pope Urban IV added the Solemnity to the universal Church’s liturgical calendar in 1264. He provided a great sequence, one of the great poems chanted or recited before the proclamation of the Gospel. At one time the Church had many sequences for different feasts and Masses (including the Dies Irae in the Requiem Mass), but now we have only three: Victimae Paschali Laudes (Christians, To the Paschal Victim) for Easter Sunday; Veni Sancte Spiritus (Come, Holy Spirit) for Pentecost, and Lauda Sion Salvatorem (Sion, Lift Up thy Voice and Sing), for Corpus Christi:


Sion, lift thy voice and sing:
 Praise thy Savior and thy King;
 Praise with hymns thy Shepherd true:
 Dare thy most to praise Him well;
 For He doth all praise excel;
 None can ever reach His due.

Special theme of praise is Thine,
 That true living Bread divine,
 That life-giving flesh adored,
 Which the brethren twelve received,
 As most faithfully believed,
 At the Supper of the Lord.

Let the chant be loud and high;
 Sweet and tranquil be the joy
 Felt to-day in every breast;
 On this festival divine
 Which recounts the origin
 Of the glorious Eucharist.

CHAP. 40.--WHATEVER HAS BEEN RIGHTLY SAID BY THE HEATHEN, WE MUST APPROPRIATE TO OUR USES.
60. Moreover, if those who are called philosophers, and especially the Platonists, have said aught that is true and in harmony with our faith, we are not only not to shrink from it, but to claim it for our own use from those who have unlawful possession of it. For, as the Egyptians had not only the idols and heavy burdens which the people of Israel hated and fled from, but also vessels and ornaments of gold and silver, and garments, which the same people when going out of Egypt appropriated to themselves, designing them for a better use, not doing this on their own authority, but by the command of God, the Egyptians themselves, in their ignorance, providing them with things which they themselves were not making a good use of;(1) in the same way all branches of heathen learning have not only false and superstitious fancies and heavy burdens of unnecessary toil, which every one of us, when going out under the leadership of Christ from the fellowship of the heathen, ought to abhor and avoid; but they contain also liberal instruction which is better adapted to the use of the truth, and some most excellent precepts of morality; and some truths in regard even to the worship of the One God are found among them. Now these are, so to speak, their gold and silver, which they did not create themselves, but dug out of the mines of God's providence which are everywhere scattered abroad, and are perversely and unlawfully prostituting to the worship of devils. These, therefore, the Christian, when he separates himself in spirit from the miserable fellowship of these men, ought to take away from them, and to devote to their proper use in preaching the gospel. Their garments, also,--that is, human institutions such as are adapted to that intercourse with men which is indispensable in this life,--we must take and turn to a Christian use.

You don't criticize me for rejecting thomist morality regarding the death penalty for heresy or his advocating the reception of a usurious loan.

Saint Thomas referred to Aristotle as THE Philosopher. 

Philosophically, this guy is a sixteenth century Protestant.

People are entitled to disagree with St. Thomas (he was not infallible), but you hold him in contempt, as you do with St. Louis de Montfort.