It seems to me like aristotle philosophy runs into problems with christianity regarding metaphysics(universals and particulars, matter and form).  

At the end of the world and the general resurrection, the bodies of the blessed will be resurrected, glorified, and reunited with their souls in the beatific vision one with God comparable to the time of adam and eve in the garden of eden where regarding grace and being there was no disorder in their bodies nor in their environment.  Disorder was introduced by sin, which in heaven there will be none of.  

The bodies of the damned will also be resurrected and changed to reflect the consequences of sin to be tormented in hell for all eternity.  Therefore, is this temporary universal/matter really eternally universal/unchangeable?  Such theory(aristotles) has its doubts.  

If our end(heaven or hell) is most important, which christianity argues it is, what becomes so useful about empirically stating the phenomenon of the present, especially when it is according to our faith only a temporal disorder subject to future change of eternal consequence?

Form or essence which makes us particular in aristotle philosophy is in Christianity actually the thing that makes us not particular.  Our essence or form(our soul) in christianity is what makes us no different from the rest(mystical body) whose essence or form conforms to christianity.  Our form or essence is what unites Christians in the communion that we consider or importance.  

At the end of the world, the universal of aristotle philosophy will undergo a change(sheep from the goats) that is arguably substantial, which aristotle argues only regards the form.  

This aristotle system according to faith seems diametrically opposed to Christianity.  

Better yet, why doesn't PG or one of his partners demonstrate the existence of God from reason? They can't use any of Aristotle's ideas. 

Better yet, why doesn't PG or one of his partners demonstrate the existence of God from reason? They can't use any of Aristotle's ideas.

And you wonder why deism has dominated church and state.  

Saint Thomas referred to Aristotle as THE Philosopher.

Only when he agreed with him. St. Thomas refers to Aristotle by name when he disagrees with him.

Deism is what you get when you ditch Aristotle.  When you ditch Aristotle you ditch teleology by implication.  And then you get the "watchmaker" of the deists; the first domino-pusher-over.  It's all you need if your concept of the universe doesn't include final causality, and if you ditch Aristotle, your concept of the universe doesn't contain final causality.

.
Okay, now you've done it. . . . You've gone RIGHT OVER PG's head.   

I studied Protestant Guy (PG) and Smelly Butler today.  I discovered a number of problems with them.  I think they may be responsible for the rise of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ beginning in the 18th Century.