Well, even most sedes had no problem with "Una cuм" Masses before Fr. Cekada came along and invented this NOVEL and self-serving doctrine.
The idea that assisting at a regular Tridentine Mass, wherein the priest prays for the Pope "one with Pope N... and our Bishop N..." somehow means we are one with his heresies and/or personal sins -- that's an insane idea that never once entered into any Traditional Catholic's mind before Fr. Cekada came along.
Fr. Cekada lived and had his apostolate in CINCINNATI, OH which is a haven of Traditional Catholicism, with around TWELVE Traditional Catholic flavors/groups/options.
So you see, it's understandable (humanly speaking) that Fr. Cekada would have naturally been tempted to come up with a scheme to "eliminate the competition" and make his flock permanently his own.
And so he did.
And for that very human, selfish, sinful, and base move, I lost all respect for him.
I've been a Traditional Catholic my whole life, and I'm in my 40's, having grown up at an independent chapel. I know Traditional Catholicism intimately. I know how they thought and believed in the early days. They avoided N.O. Masses, but they attended pretty much ANY Tridentine Mass, as long as the priest was valid. None of this "anti-Una cuм" nonsense. And sedevacantism was a side thing, a personal opinion, not something you included in your identity. ("I want to find a good, Traditional, Sedevacantist girl and get married...") Those words in quotes would have sounded like this: "I want to find a good, modest, Traditional Catholic girl named Emily and get married, and then..." Or mentioning specific interests/hobbies that your future spouse would have. It would be unrealistic and cute, something kids would say about "when they grow up" -- but no adults would say it or mean it.