Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Father Christopher Feeney sspx  (Read 5653 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Quo vadis Domine

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 4198
  • Reputation: +2439/-557
  • Gender: Male
Re: Father Christopher Feeney sspx
« Reply #45 on: October 09, 2021, 12:10:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Catholic Candle says:

    'So-called “father” Christopher Paul Feeney Supposedly ordained in 2010 in the conciliar church of the diocese of Norwalk, CT. The “new” SSPX has been sending the man on a “mass” circuit. Source: a Catholic Candle contributor and reader.'

    Honestly Catholic Candle has an unusual home alone version of SSPX Resistance who is very definite that Francis is Pope, but there are no safe Masses in the whole US. CC also holds that sedes cannot ordain or be consecrated, so the 'so called' form of words is used for those who don't have old diocesan or SSPX orders.

    Anyhow, there's no evidence Fr Feeney was conditionally ordained.

    An excellent source told me that he was conditionally ordained.
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?


    Offline crowbar

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 172
    • Reputation: +86/-68
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Father Christopher Feeney sspx
    « Reply #46 on: October 10, 2021, 09:07:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Any relation to the OG? 


    Offline Prayerful

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1002
    • Reputation: +354/-59
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Father Christopher Feeney sspx
    « Reply #47 on: October 10, 2021, 11:12:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • An excellent source told me that he was conditionally ordained.
    Someone with the details could advise the editor of Catholic Candle. His listing is not perfect, but there is much worse (I've seen a Pfeifferite listing which seemed almost to take his sect as the remnants of the Church and other equivalent oddities), and is accurate taking account of certain quirks, both Conciliar and sede ordinations and consecration are taken as automatically invalid, which is not right, not what any genuine expert would accept, and there seems a weird suspicion of the Greek Rite, whose orders were not grievously mangled by Paul VI