Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Are analogical middle terms sufficient for a valid demonstration?  (Read 369 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Geremia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4125
  • Reputation: +1260/-261
  • Gender: Male
    • St. Isidore e-book library
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Fr. William A. Wallace, O.P., in “Thomism and the Quantum Enigma,” The Thomist 61 (1997): 455–468, claims that
    Quote
    analogical middle terms are sufficient for a valid demonstration

    and that this is
    Quote
    a teaching that is distinctive of Thomism
    that other Scholastic schools do not uphold.

    How do Thomists justify that "analogical middle terms are sufficient for a valid demonstration"?

    (cf. this on "mixed sciences" or scientia media, this Philosophy.StackExchange.com question, and this StackExchange  answer)
    St. Isidore e-book library: https://isidore.co/calibre