Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Archbishop Vigano Interviewed by a New York Times journalist…..  (Read 1951 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr G

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2422
  • Reputation: +1586/-94
  • Gender: Male
Archbishop Vigano Interviewed by a New York Times journalist…..
« on: March 06, 2025, 09:17:22 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Interviewed by a New York Times journalist….. – Ecclesia Militans

    Arcivescovo Carlo Maria Viganò on X: "2. How are those who have opposed the direction Pope Francis has taken the church working to correct course? What, if anything, is being done to make sure the next Pontiff will not repeat what many see as Francis's shortcomings? Or is that futile?   Many think they can simply" / X

    2. How are those who have opposed the direction Pope Francis has taken the church working to correct course? What, if anything, is being done to make sure the next Pontiff will not repeat what many see as Francis's shortcomings? Or is that futile?
     
    Many think they can simply close the Bergoglian parenthesis by electing a pope who is “conservative” but who does not question the Second Vatican Council and its disastrous reforms, such as Cardinal Raymond     Burke or Cardinal Robert Sarah. But hoping this will happen is truly a “Mission Impossible,” given that 110 cardinals out of 138 cardinals have been created by Bergoglio precisely to “shield” the Bergoglian synodal revolution and guarantee that it continues.
     
    Those who enter the Conclave thinking they only need to plug a few holes while continuing on a course that has proven to be a disaster – I am referring to the conciliar revolution – will not obtain any lasting results. There are now sixty years of errors and horrors that need to be completely reset: a titanic task, which only divine intervention can make possible.
     
    Bergoglio’s usurpation – which I have denounced and which has earned me “excommunication” – undermines the legitimacy of the Cardinals he has created in these twelve years and the validity of the election of any Successor. This is why an operation of transparency and justice is needed before proceeding to convene a Conclave. To believe that the death of Bergoglio can make us simply forget everything and allow us to turn the page without doing anything, would be a very serious error and a betrayal of the mandate that Our Lord gave to the Apostles and their Successors.
    Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47069
    • Reputation: +27898/-5203
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Archbishop Vigano Interviewed by a New York Times journalist…..
    « Reply #1 on: March 06, 2025, 02:21:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Mr G on March 06, 2025, 09:17:22 AM

    Many think they can simply close the Bergoglian parenthesis by electing a pope who is “conservative” but who does not question the Second Vatican Council and its disastrous reforms, such as Cardinal Raymond     Burke or Cardinal Robert Sarah. But hoping this will happen is truly a “Mission Impossible,” given that 110 cardinals out of 138 cardinals have been created by Bergoglio precisely to “shield” the Bergoglian synodal revolution and guarantee that it continues.

    I've said the same, so that if a Burke or Sarah or even Mueller do emerge from the next conclave, it'll have to have been part of a stratagem to reabsorb SSPX.  That would be far more destructive than Pope Jorge II.  We have some like LifeSite, Marshall, Matt et al. straddling the fence who would explosively re-enter the Conciliar fold so quickly it would give us whiplash to observe it if they rolled out a Sarah, who then restored Strickland, rolled back AL and FS, reinstituted the Motu, and perhaps sacked one or two of the most egregious heresiarchs.
    Logged

    Offline Yeti

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4133
    • Reputation: +2432/-528
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Archbishop Vigano Interviewed by a New York Times journalist…..
    « Reply #2 on: March 06, 2025, 02:41:05 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • That site seems a bit ... off. There is an image in the sidebar on the right of a man on a horse, probably in the 19th century. The title of the picture says "Henry V, Future Great Monarch". I did a bit of digging and discovered that this is Henri, the Count of Chambord. He died in 1883. How can he be the future monarch of anything?
    Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47069
    • Reputation: +27898/-5203
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Archbishop Vigano Interviewed by a New York Times journalist…..
    « Reply #3 on: March 06, 2025, 03:34:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Yeti on March 06, 2025, 02:41:05 PM
    That site seems a bit ... off. There is an image in the sidebar on the right of a man on a horse, probably in the 19th century. The title of the picture says "Henry V, Future Great Monarch". I did a bit of digging and discovered that this is Henri, the Count of Chambord. He died in 1883. How can he be the future monarch of anything?

    Perhaps he faked his death, and Gajewski is actually Henry V.
    Logged
    Pages: [1]
    « previous next »