Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Archbishop Vigano Accused by the Vatican of the Crime of Schism  (Read 8030 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Archbishop Vigano Accused by the Vatican of the Crime of Schism
« Reply #55 on: June 22, 2024, 04:57:22 AM »
Ohhhh......  didn't see the dates. Thanks
You're welcome.  That is, of course, if the dates given by the Decree are in fact true/accurate (i.e.. that the process really did start as early as 5/10).  

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Archbishop Vigano Accused by the Vatican of the Crime of Schism
« Reply #56 on: June 22, 2024, 05:38:51 AM »
You're welcome.  That is, of course, if the dates given by the Decree are in fact true/accurate (i.e.. that the process really did start as early as 5/10). 

I do find the timing curious.  +Vigano called Jorge the "servant of the devil" and has been questioning his legitimacy for nearly a year, has rejected Vatican II for about 4 years now, yet now that he revealed allegations that Bergoglio sodomized some novices suddenly he's being charged with schism.

Marshall got it right that the Vatican KNOW that the understanding that most of the general public will come away with here is that this is retribution from Bergoglio for +Vigano's having blown the whislte on the McCarrick situation ... which is precisely why I have been saying they've avoided publicly condeming or punishing +Vigano before now.  But something has changed, so I suspect that the timing might have been fudged a little.  They may have had this "extrajudicial process" sitting there for months just waiting to be executed when it became necessary.


Re: Archbishop Vigano Accused by the Vatican of the Crime of Schism
« Reply #57 on: June 22, 2024, 08:55:52 AM »
"I therefore wish to make it clear that I did not go to the Vatican yesterday [June 20], and that I have no intention of going to the Holy Office on June 28, and that I have not delivered any statement or docuмent in my defense to the Dicastery, whose authority I do not recognize, nor do I recognize the authority of its Prefect, nor do I recognize the authority of the one who appointed him."
(emphasis mine)

https://exsurgedomine.it/240621-announcement/

Offline Angelus

  • Supporter
Re: Archbishop Vigano Accused by the Vatican of the Crime of Schism
« Reply #58 on: June 22, 2024, 09:05:18 AM »

"This anonymous “canon lawyer” considers my statement as a proof of my schismatic will: but the whole question concerns which is the “church” to which Bergoglio belongs and the de facto schism from the true Church that he has already accomplished over and over again with his declarations, with his acts of government, and with his most eloquent behavior of open hostility to all that is Catholic. Bergoglio’s “church” is not the Catholic Church, but rather that “conciliar church” born from Vatican Council II and recently rebranded with the no less heretical name of “synodal church.” If it is from this “church” that I am declared to be separated by schism, it will be for me a cause for honor and pride."


https://exsurgedomine.it/240621-announcement/

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Archbishop Vigano Accused by the Vatican of the Crime of Schism
« Reply #59 on: June 22, 2024, 09:57:50 AM »
"Bergoglio’s “church” is not the Catholic Church, but rather that “conciliar church” born from Vatican Council II and recently rebranded with the no less heretical name of “synodal church.” If it is from this “church” that I am declared to be separated by schism, it will be for me a cause for honor and pride."

https://exsurgedomine.it/240621-announcement/

Excellent.