You're welcome. That is, of course, if the dates given by the Decree are in fact true/accurate (i.e.. that the process really did start as early as 5/10).
I do find the timing curious. +Vigano called Jorge the "servant of the devil" and has been questioning his legitimacy for nearly a year, has rejected Vatican II for about 4 years now, yet now that he revealed allegations that Bergoglio sodomized some novices suddenly he's being charged with schism.
Marshall got it right that the Vatican KNOW that the understanding that most of the general public will come away with here is that this is retribution from Bergoglio for +Vigano's having blown the whislte on the McCarrick situation ... which is precisely why I have been saying they've avoided publicly condeming or punishing +Vigano before now. But something has changed, so I suspect that the timing might have been fudged a little. They may have had this "extrajudicial process" sitting there for months just waiting to be executed when it became necessary.