Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
In the article linked to in the OP, on the 4th paragraph from the bottom, +Vigano writes:"Fifty years ago, in that same palace of the holy office, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was summoned and accused of schism for rejecting Vatican ll. His defense is mine; his words are mine."Actually, Archbishop Lefebvre, when summoned to the Holy Office, maintained his loyalty to the Pope in his defense. He did so again in written communications. So, Vigano's defense is not the same as Archbishop Lefebvre.
This seems to the summer of major events. The SSPX announcing the neccessity to consecrate bishops, Rome planning to ban the True Mass and now Archbishop Vigano accused of schism.
What are you blabbering about here with "Loyalty to the Pope"? +Lefebvre was clearly being "disloyal" in rejecting V2 and the Modernist reforms? +Lefebvre was loyal to the Papacy but not to the "Pope".