I think "Why" is really important as none of this would go down at this time without context -

Yes, but the double-bind with Bergoglio is whether he punishes acts of schism against the Vicar of Christ vs. "schism" perceived as against his own self.

He's shown that he seems to have no compunction whatsoever when he attacks the papacy. Look at that recent study docuмent reassessing Vatican I, also his playing around with every pagan shaman and wicked worldling that shows up to flatter him.

It's when someone dares to speak against his publicly visible sins against the Faith and his secular crimes that he strikes back. Not because he's defending The Church but because he behaves as a warlord of this world. He uses Canon Law selectively when it suits him.

There's a meme going around social media about St. Thomas More who, when summoned to trial, deferred to H8's temporal authority but refused to concede H8's seizure of ecclesial authority. The parallel's not perfect, but it is illustrative.

https://www.youtube.com/live/KIxIJyyp2vg?si=veOMYm6tUp2CRQze


Taylor Marshall is spinning that Vigano's charges are because of the McCarrick report by the Archbishop.

It seems everyone has forgotten to mention what Archbishop Vigano said last week about Bergoglio.....

"I replied to him: « Holy Father, I don’t know if you know Cardinal McCarrick, but if you ask the Congregation for Bishops, there is a dossier this big. He corrupted generations of seminarians...»
Bergoglio remained impassive and completely changed the subject.

His reaction is not surprising. Bergoglio himself committed the same abuses when he was Master of Novices of the Society of Jesus in Argentina, as personally confided to me by one of his former novices."
^^^^^^^^^^

This^
Must be the reason they brought these charges against him now.
They can't let this narrative continue and had to shut it down.
I don't think it had anything to do with McCarrick. We've been hearing about all of this filth since Boston and Cardinal Law and no aggressive action was taken against any whistleblowers

Except he made that accusation on May 29th and according to the "Decree" they started the excommunication/trial process on May 10th.  

Taylor Marshall is spinning that Vigano's charges are because of the McCarrick report by the Archbishop.

Good.  This will ensure that the media coverage will dredge up the old history of Bergoglio / McCarrick, leading to the implication in those who are not theologically astute (i.e. 99.9% of the general public) that this entails Bergoglio engaging in retribution for the McCarrick situation.  I mentioned that this would be the smart play.  This will make Bergoglio look even more complicit in the coverup of McCarrick's predations and will bring those back into the news.  Most people don't understand the finer points of Catholic theology (schism, SVism, Traditionalism, etc.), so they'll view this situation from a political perspective.  I know that a lot of Prots online can't stand Jorge due to the wokism he promotes, and they'll view it as the Leftist/Commie pope taking it out on someone on the Right.

This is the first I have heard this charge. Is the sodomite heretic enabler also an alcoholic?

He worked as a nightclub bouncer in Buenos Aires way back when.

You're welcome.  That is, of course, if the dates given by the Decree are in fact true/accurate (i.e.. that the process really did start as early as 5/10). 

I do find the timing curious.  +Vigano called Jorge the "servant of the devil" and has been questioning his legitimacy for nearly a year, has rejected Vatican II for about 4 years now, yet now that he revealed allegations that Bergoglio sodomized some novices suddenly he's being charged with schism.

Marshall got it right that the Vatican KNOW that the understanding that most of the general public will come away with here is that this is retribution from Bergoglio for +Vigano's having blown the whislte on the McCarrick situation ... which is precisely why I have been saying they've avoided publicly condeming or punishing +Vigano before now.  But something has changed, so I suspect that the timing might have been fudged a little.  They may have had this "extrajudicial process" sitting there for months just waiting to be executed when it became necessary.