But then he also says this:
Everything that Bergoglio does constitutes an offense and a provocation to the entire Catholic Church, to her Saints of all times, to the Martyrs who were killed in odium Fidei, and to the Popes of all times until the Second Vatican Council.
?
He creates quite a large taxonomic vacuum here. He identifies (Category 1) the true Roman Catholic hierarchy that existed before Vatican II, and (Category 2) the "enemy" Bergoglio, whose crimes offend the Church. Between "until Vatican II" and "Bergoglio," there were five intervening impostors and 60+ years of all-out apostasy, under the direct leadership and control of these same impostors.
By the clear meaning of his terms, Vigano excludes the novus ordo pontiffs from his Categories 1 and 2. Omission is exclusion in this context.
So how should they be classified? Or do we simply make believe that Bergoglio and Vatican II are the bad guys - Vatican II in a nebulous way, and Bergoglio in a particular and unique way - while all that exists between them on the timeline is untouchable?
This is very slippery talk. It has a great potency for deception and falsity.
I think Vigano would do well to say many fewer words than is his wont, and rather to say with precision and clarity one short sentence: The novus ordo is not the Catholic Church; it's popes and bishops - from Roncalli to Bergoglio - are not the Roman Catholic hierarchy; and all Catholics must reject and renounce the false church - or else go to hell.
I can no longer tolerate anyone who says anything less than this. It's too obvious now, too, too out in the open for benefits of doubts. Now is the separation of the wheat and the chaff. Cough up the truth, or go work at McDonalds.
Topic: Archbishop Vigano Accused by the Vatican of the Crime of Schism (Read 8038 times)