Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: ARCHBISHOP LENGA INTERVIEW ON THE LATIN MASS  (Read 441 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr G

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2133
  • Reputation: +1330/-87
  • Gender: Male
ARCHBISHOP LENGA INTERVIEW ON THE LATIN MASS
« on: July 19, 2021, 10:18:14 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Archbishop Lenga responds to the Antipope on the Ancient Roman Rite | From Rome

    EXCLUSIVE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF TRANSCRIPT
    P-Laudetur Jesus Christus

    AL -In secula seculorum Amen.

    P-Readers and watchers of Abp are asking often recently if your can bring closer the problematic associated with Tridentine Mass. Maybe lets start from the question- “Why did the Archbishop start celebrating the Tridentine Mass?”


    AL- Interesting question. I could even paraphrase it in a different way – “Why have I not, for so many years, celebrated Tridentine Mass? “ Because to answer today “Why it is celebrated today” one needs to answer the question “Why is it not celebrated ?”

    The Tridentine Mass was established by Pope Pius V 450 years ago. While the Mass of Paul the VI was established over 50 years ago. And this new Mass of Paul VI actually damaged, almost to the roots, the power and spiritual value of Tridentine Mass, the virtues that were available to the people participating in this Holy Mass. The Tridentine Mass embraced centuries of the Church until the time it was finally formed by Pope Pius V, from different forms, places, traditions; done the best way.*

    Whereas the Holy Mass of Paul the VI was all done in the worst way to damage what was the best. Because the Tridentine Mass was made as the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ, and all the gestures made during Tridentine Mass showing Christ Passion , also outfits, etc, it all speaks about the Passion of the Christ, of His Sacrifice. And the priest is also as a sacrifice who is performing bloodless sacrifice on the altar and leads people during the Holy Mass. In Tridentine Mass priest acts as “ alter Christus”, he doesn’t act as someone who entertains people, cheers them up at the altar, introduces some gestures, people are looking around each other, and are content not because they participate in the highest importance event; all is made shallow, the dialogues of the priest and the people, it is as if like on the stage, there are artists on the stage and those who watch them. And as if in watching the performance with some higher, psychological stuff, the people are focusing on the artist’s outfits and the circuмstances of the film and are not watching the higher ideas included there.

    While the Tridentine Mass is this idea , this Sacrifice, where people and the priest are looking in the same direction- at the Cross. And the priest mainly celebrates the Mass in the silent form and people participate, can contemplate, instead of watching the priest, his mimics, gestures of his face and hands etc. They see him from the back, usually on the chasuble (the back of the liturgical outfit) is the Cross, Jesus’ Corpus, that inspires people to participate in this Sacrifice, to see and understand higher things, instead of the priest who is standing facing people and eclipses Jesus from being seen.

    I was born during the time when the Council had not yet come, but when I grew up this Council was completed, when I was in the army and attended seminary as that Mass was there already. And those priests who taught me were already deprived of the power of Tridentine Mass as it was accepted this way. The Pope said “now is different “, the Council established it and everyone moved on to the whatever new. Why? Because every priest is obedient to his superiors, bishop and pope. The pope damaged all what he damaged, so we have until today what’s been damaged. In order to renew all and give up the new Mass of the pope Paul VI is quite difficult to do.

    When I was celebrating almost all my life, for 40 years, the new Mass, of course I was putting all my faith there I had, I tried to celebrate best I could. There was no guitars during the Masses celebrated, and in Kazakhstan, that has never been the case when I was the parish priest there. I was celebrating it with the best devotion, piety inside me, for the people, as much as it was possible. But I didn’t know that there is a different relation, a different Holy Mass, that I just don’t know anything about. And when I started finding out about it was only when I was moved to Poland.

    Before I heard something there being some sort of Tridentine Mass, no one talked about it in the Church, no one celebrated it in the Church and during Synods. Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI also wherever they went had Holy Masses on the public squares, not in the churches, with greetings, playing, enjoying, policemen, institutions etc, and you don’t know where’s a Mass and where is some show Mass-about. But when I started to think a bit and consider and look at what Tridentine Mass is, I saw that they robbed me of what they didn’t let me know. If I had known the Tridentine Mass earlier and seen the quality in it that I can see now (and then they have changed it into the cheap Paul the VI Mass), I would have certainly disagreed. That’s what I consider today. But if they robbed me of it without my knowledge and they didn’t let me know it, I just knew what I knew. So after the thinking about these things and hearing other people comments that they go to the Tridentine Mass and how it looks, and after reading of different things about Tridentine Mass, as much as I could, at the end of my life, I was allowed to be able  to arrive at it: I can see that Mass was stolen and we can see the results of it all, what is going on in the Church today. Because the Mass of Paul the VI was prepared to protestantize the Church, protestants and Jєωs were participating (in its formation). Protestantising and Judaizing the Holy Mass instead of Catholicizing it. The Catholicizing of the Mass was thrown away and the other things were left. There. That’s why I changed.

    I wasn’t celebrating The Tridentine Mass because I didn’t want to; not because I was saying “tomorrow, the day after tomorrow, etc”, but because I wasn’t given the opportunity to know it. I reckon today also many priests, because they were not given to know it, that they were robbed of it, not only in Poland but all over the world they were robbed of this Holy Mass, they are not celebrating it. And if they wanted to celebrate it , it is obstructed by the bishop, the Vatican, or their monastery. Even if some nun wants to go to the Tridentine Mass to feel more spiritual in her soul, the stupid superior nun forbids her to do participate, even if the pope doesn’t forbids it — “she’s wiser than the pope”. The dictate of the superiors that don’t have much idea of what was lost and stolen from us, they are the barriers and obstacle for those today’s ones who can detect with the heart and the soul that they are missing the real devotion, and the Tridentine Mass leads to it.
    I would think that maybe I did it because I am expelled from all that structures — they exiled me from all their structures — I am a free bird, but I want to be free in Christ. So I have the altars where I have the Holy Mass as the bishop forbids me to have it in his diocese. Bishops in Poland have washed their hands of that. It’s on the “black list”. But this is not a problem; it’s possible to celebrate the Holy Mass somewhere in a cenacle, upstairs, hidden from Jєωs and all the persecutors, putting your nose up at all those barriers they put. Many priests today even if they would like to do something good are bound by those barriers and obstacles that are not coming only from the external world, but rather from the internal world of the Church. Bishops disturb them and they themselves don’t know and don’t want to know it (the Tridentine Mass). If they got to know all of it, if they had some scraps of faith, they maybe they would allow it. But if the leftovers of their faith are missing then everything is missing and it counts to them to be in the mainstream and to be liked by everyone. I don’t want to be in the mainstream, I have never been and will never be. So I am going to the roots, not to “where the leaves are only moving on the tree and it looks nice”. To me it is about deepening the Christ in my life and passing this deepening in my soul and my being on to those people that feel like me or to those I can learn from as they know more than me. That’s why the Tridentine Mass is such a road-sign” to me and is so important. I don’t impose it, but if someone feels that he has to do it and wants to do it – let him do it without asking the bishops, superiors; as they are bigger” than even today’s popes that “don’t meet the challenge”.

    Amen.

    P-Thank you Arb.

    AL-Thanks be to God
    ___________
    ** Editor Note:  The Missale Romanum of St. Pius V is the same Missale Curiale of a century before, which in turn was the Missale of the Franciscan Order, which St. Francis adopted from the private chapel of Pope Innocent III.  From Innocent III to St. Pius V it did not undergo any substantive or formal changes.



    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41908
    • Reputation: +23946/-4345
    • Gender: Male
    Re: ARCHBISHOP LENGA INTERVIEW ON THE LATIN MASS
    « Reply #1 on: July 19, 2021, 11:05:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Wow.

    This bishop is evidently also from Kazakhstan.  Unfortunately ordained in 1980 and consecrated in 1991.

    At some point, Bergoglio is going to get an uncontrollable backlash from people like this who still have the faith.

    Perhaps this MP will be a catalyst for people to reject Bergoglio as no longer recognizable as a Catholic.


    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: ARCHBISHOP LENGA INTERVIEW ON THE LATIN MASS
    « Reply #2 on: July 19, 2021, 11:13:29 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Perhaps this MP will be a catalyst for people to reject Bergoglio as no longer recognizable as a Catholic.

    This is already happening.

    Ferrara (at the Remnant) now refers to him as "Bergoglio."

    And though I side with JST/Cajetan/Billuart/Suarez in maintaining that even a manifest heretic retains office until the Church declares the fact of his heresy, and then declares his deposition (realizing others here hotly disagree), you are essentially correct:

    His Catholicity is evermore in doubt, while his hostility to tradition is evermore apparent.

    For some reason, being labeled a "practical sedevacantist" no longer carries the sting it once did, and in fact, it begins to feel more like a duty.
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41908
    • Reputation: +23946/-4345
    • Gender: Male
    Re: ARCHBISHOP LENGA INTERVIEW ON THE LATIN MASS
    « Reply #3 on: July 19, 2021, 11:30:16 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is already happening.

    Ferrara (at the Remnant) now refers to him as "Bergoglio."

    And though I side with JST/Cajetan/Billuart/Suarez in maintaining that even a manifest heretic retains office until the Church declares the fact of his heresy, and then declares his deposition (realizing others here hotly disagree), you are essentially correct:

    His Catholicity is evermore in doubt, while his hostility to tradition is evermore apparent.

    For some reason, being labeled a "practical sedevacantist" no longer carries the sting it once did, and in fact, it begins to feel more like a duty.

    Yes, more and more Traditional Catholics are being united in the conviction that Bergoglio is not Catholic.  I recall when Bishop Williamson said of Wojtyla that he was largely confused (due to a Modernist-infected mind), but I don't think anyone believes that about Bergoglio.

    Perhaps we could disagree only on the technicalities of how the Church disposes of such a non-Catholic pope ... the same argument that Bellarmine had with Cajetan and John of St. Thomas.

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13825
    • Reputation: +5568/-865
    • Gender: Male
    Re: ARCHBISHOP LENGA INTERVIEW ON THE LATIN MASS
    « Reply #4 on: July 19, 2021, 11:36:19 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is already happening.
    Just pray for him, he certainly is in dire need of many prayers.

    The recent mp's message is meant to further divide, that's it's main purpose and it will accomplish this but hopefully, only a very few will fall for it.
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse


    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10060
    • Reputation: +5256/-916
    • Gender: Female
    Re: ARCHBISHOP LENGA INTERVIEW ON THE LATIN MASS
    « Reply #5 on: July 19, 2021, 11:45:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This was posted at Brother Bugnolo's "Benedict is still pope" website FromRome.  They are saying this is actually from June (ie. pre-Bergoglio MP)
    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. (Matthew 24:24)

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: ARCHBISHOP LENGA INTERVIEW ON THE LATIN MASS
    « Reply #6 on: July 19, 2021, 11:51:10 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Just pray for him, he certainly is in dire need of many prayers.

    The recent mp's message is meant to further divide, that's it's main purpose and it will accomplish this but hopefully, only a very few will fall for it.

    Take this FWIW, but an SSSPX priest in communication with a diocesan priest tells me that he was told by the latter that the MP which was published, egregious as it is, represented a significantly toned down version of the original that Francis wanted to publish.

    Apparently/allegedly, the contempt for tradition, trads, and the TLM oozed in the first draft.
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Clemens Maria

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2246
    • Reputation: +1484/-605
    • Gender: Male
    Re: ARCHBISHOP LENGA INTERVIEW ON THE LATIN MASS
    « Reply #7 on: July 19, 2021, 01:15:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is already happening.

    Ferrara (at the Remnant) now refers to him as "Bergoglio."

    And though I side with JST/Cajetan/Billuart/Suarez in maintaining that even a manifest heretic retains office until the Church declares the fact of his heresy, and then declares his deposition (realizing others here hotly disagree), you are essentially correct:

    His Catholicity is evermore in doubt, while his hostility to tradition is evermore apparent.

    For some reason, being labeled a "practical sedevacantist" no longer carries the sting it once did, and in fact, it begins to feel more like a duty.

    I disagree with Fr Chazal but his position at least protects him from being corrupted by the Modernists.  Whereas the SSPX position doesn't protect them from the Modernists.  They believe that Whoregαy and the Novus Ordo cardinals and bishops are the magisterium and that the magisterium can't be trusted so it is necessary to only take what is good and leave what they consider to be bad.  Whereas Fr Chazal believes the Modernists are "impounded" and therefore you wouldn't take anything from them.  You may be absolutely convinced that Padre Pio is a saint (and I would agree) but he isn't yet canonized.  It doesn't matter what the Novus Ordo Church does.  They are utterly useless.


    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13825
    • Reputation: +5568/-865
    • Gender: Male
    Re: ARCHBISHOP LENGA INTERVIEW ON THE LATIN MASS
    « Reply #8 on: July 19, 2021, 01:24:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Take this FWIW, but an SSSPX priest in communication with a diocesan priest tells me that he was told by the latter that the MP which was published, egregious as it is, represented a significantly toned down version of the original that Francis wanted to publish.

    Apparently/allegedly, the contempt for tradition, trads, and the TLM oozed in the first draft.
    All Modernists, whether they admit it or not, hate everything traditional - at the top of their list is the TLM. It's been that way since I can remember. PPVI worded his perpetration very kindly, PJP2 was barely tolerant, PF is the most open yet, he clearly wants it gone, the main difference between him and the others is that he has advised the bishops to do the dirty work. Other than that, nothing new here. 
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse