Author Topic: another wreckovation (Read 923 times)

Iuvenalis · « **on:** December 02, 2014, 04:49:17 PM »

http://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2014/12/what-clericalism-looks-like

poche · « **Reply #1 on:** December 02, 2014, 10:51:08 PM »

Why not get the group together and write the petition again. If that doesn't work go over his head. We have to be patient and persistent.

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #2 on:** December 03, 2014, 10:09:07 AM »

Quote from: poche

Why not get the group together and write the petition again. If that doesn't work go over his head. We have to be patient and persistent.

The Bishop approved the wreckovation and, if petitioned, Pope Francis would roll his eyes and say "What's the problem with the pelagians who are so attracted to the tired past? Don't they know that we have a new ecclesiology in town?"

Nadir · « **Reply #3 on:** December 04, 2014, 01:05:17 AM »

The writer states Benedict XVI "was concerned to correct those who regarded the older, extraordinary form of the Roman rite as harmful".

Here's the rub. When I was growing up there was no there was no extraordinary form of the Roman rite. There was only Mass. It was not the older form. Extraordinary form is just is another innovation.

This church is a part of the newchurch set-up, with a little "tradition", or what the writer sees as tradition, thrown in. Extraordinary rite is not tradition. The Mix won't work. The confusion the writer manifests here is a result of mixing it.

I wonder what is the likelihood of this act coming to a court case.

Some photos and comments here:
http://www.tripadvisor.com.au/Attraction_Review-g60763-d1019103-Reviews-Church_of_Our_Savior-New_York_City_New_York.html