The writer states Benedict XVI "was concerned to correct those who regarded the older, extraordinary form of the Roman rite as harmful".
Here's the rub. When I was growing up there was no there was no
extraordinary form of the Roman rite. There was only Mass. It was not the older form. Extraordinary form is just is another innovation.
This church is a part of the newchurch set-up, with a little "tradition", or what the writer sees as tradition, thrown in. Extraordinary rite is not tradition. The Mix won't work. The confusion the writer manifests here is a result of mixing it.
I wonder what is the likelihood of this act coming to a court case.
Some photos and comments here:
http://www.tripadvisor.com.au/Attraction_Review-g60763-d1019103-Reviews-Church_of_Our_Savior-New_York_City_New_York.html