Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: another sign of sspx death  (Read 5797 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

another sign of sspx death
« on: March 21, 2018, 09:53:16 PM »
http://www.ecclesiamilitans.com/2018/03/20/sspx-canada-implicitly-admits-state-of-necessity-no-longer-exists/

St. Raphael’s Priory of the SSPX in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada has published its March 2018 Bulletin in which there is a picture of a married couple standing beside a Novus Ordo priest and Fr. Richard Vachon, SSPX.  It seems that the couple were married by the Novus Ordo priest in his parish and Fr. Vachon celebrated the Traditional Mass afterwards.  By this act, the SSPX Canadian District has implicitly admitted that the state of necessity no longer exists.  Therefore, it can no longer resort to using the argument of supplied jurisdiction for the validity of its marriages.

Re: another sign of sspx death
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2018, 10:39:06 PM »

There are SSPX priests who will argue that the supplied jurisdiction was never an argument for validity of marriages but only confessions. If any have come to the point of getting married by an SSPX priest, there is a form which one signs. The form explains that the milieu of the Novus Ordo etc, but does not specifically mention supplied jurisdiction. Newer SSPX priests do argue that the supplied jurisdiction was only in regards to confession. I had a long conversation with a priest about this just recently.


Re: another sign of sspx death
« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2018, 01:11:35 AM »
 :really-mad2: :really-mad2: :really-mad2:

Re: another sign of sspx death
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2018, 09:56:16 AM »
There are SSPX priests who will argue that the supplied jurisdiction was never an argument for validity of marriages but only confessions. 
What does that mean? Are they saying that the couples married by the SSPX in the past are living in adultery? 

Re: another sign of sspx death
« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2018, 01:03:59 PM »
What does that mean? Are they saying that the couples married by the SSPX in the past are living in adultery?
That would be the logical conclusion, it seems.