Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Another report of Prevost protecting child sɛҳuąƖ abuser  (Read 454 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cera

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6425
  • Reputation: +2947/-1523
  • Gender: Female
  • Pray for the consecration of Russia to Mary's I H
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • Pray for the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary

    Offline Cera

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6425
    • Reputation: +2947/-1523
    • Gender: Female
    • Pray for the consecration of Russia to Mary's I H
    Re: Another report of Prevost protecting child sɛҳuąƖ abuser
    « Reply #1 on: May 10, 2025, 12:47:30 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • For those who missed it, here's another coverup by Provest when he was in Peru.

    InfoVaticana described the Peruvian scandal, which was the subject of a national television report including interview with the girls last fall, as the "stone in the shoe for Cardinal Prevost," who has emerged as a surprise favorite to win the papacy, despite his American roots.

    "After a few hours, I got up to vomit"

    The scandal began in 2022, when three minor girls went to Prevost and accused Father Eleuterio Vasquez Gonzalez and Ricardo Yesquen Paiva, two priests in his diocese, of molesting them.

    Ana Maria Quispe said she told Prevost that at age nine, Vasquez Gonzalez "sat me on his legs and began to kiss me," according to a Sept. 2024 report by Cuarto Poder, a national investigative news program in Peru.

    "He lies down and hugs me, he takes me with his arms and legs. I froze, I didn't sleep at all. After a few hours, I got up to vomit," she said.

    Another young girl, age 11, told Prevost that Vasquez Gonzalez told her 'bring something to warm yourself' (...) I arranged the bed and (...) I feel that he begins to hug me under the polo shirt, touching my back."

    Quispe Diaz and the other girls sent a letter to Pope Francis in April 2022 detailing their allegations.

    "A previous investigation was never carried out during the mandate of Mons. Robert Prevost Martínez OSA, despite having direct knowledge of the victim priest Eleuterio Vásquez Gonzales had accepted the facts before his person," it said.

    https://globebanner.com/stories/671154673-report-critics-of-pope-favorite-prevost-received-150k-to-remain-silent
    Pray for the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary


    Offline Cera

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6425
    • Reputation: +2947/-1523
    • Gender: Female
    • Pray for the consecration of Russia to Mary's I H
    Re: Another report of Prevost protecting child sɛҳuąƖ abuser
    « Reply #2 on: May 10, 2025, 12:48:41 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • This is from another thread.

    Another case — first reported by The Pillar in 2021 — has also drawn attention amid Prevost’s candidacy.
    In 2000, Prevost allowed a Chicago archdiocesan priest who sɛҳuąƖly abused minors to live in an Augustinian rectory around the corner from a Catholic school — in a residence Cardinal Blase Cupich later said was not appropriate for priests accused of abuse.
    in September 2000, Fr. James Ray was permitted to live at St. John Stone Friary, a house of the Chicago province of the Augustinian religious order. The friary is half a block from a parish elementary school.

    According to diocesan records, the move required approval by Prevost, who was then an Augustinian provincial superior.

    According to diocesan records reviewed by The Pillar, Ray had been restricted in ministry for nine years by 2000, and had been accused multiple times of sɛҳuąƖly abusing boys, at least one of them for years. He had admitted to bringing at least one boy to sleep in his rectory bed, but said of one allegation that he “did not recall” having sɛҳuąƖly assaulted a child with whom he admitted to having “cuddled.” Ray did admit to diocesan officials that in 1993 he engaged in sɛҳuąƖ activity with a man while on a pilgrimage to Medjugorje, a supposed Marian apparition site in Croatia.

    A July 2000 memo from a Chicago archdiocesan official indicates that the Augustinians at the friary said they would permit Ray to rent rooms in the building after they received permission from their provincial superior, Prevost. Ray actually moved in two months later.

    The friary was the second choice of a residence for Ray, who was required to move in 2000 because of the pending sale of the diocesan property where he had been living under supervision. The first rectory proposed for his residence was rejected by the archdiocesan review board because it was on the same property as a parish school.

    Archdiocesan records say the Augustinian residence was considered suitable for Ray because “there is no school in the immediate area.”

    In fact, St. Thomas the Apostle Catholic elementary school is less than a block from the residence. But there is no record that archdiocesan officials who visited the site or Augustinian leaders raised that as a concern, even though a Catholic school principal had warned the archdiocese years earlier that Ray sometimes took children out of class, and that he was “touchytender” with some students.

    When the Augustinians permitted Ray to live at the friary, records indicate they understood at least summarily what accusations the priest faced. Augustinian leaders met with diocesan officials to discuss Ray’s background, and an Augustinian in residence at the house agreed to monitor the priest’s compliance with the restrictions of his ministry set by the archdiocese, including that he not be alone with children.

    But administrators at St. Thomas the Apostle School were not notified that a priest accused of serial sɛҳuąƖly abusing children was living in proximity to the parish elementary school, that he should not be allowed to help out in the school or parish, or that he was not permitted to be alone with children.


    https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/why-prevosts-papal-prospects-prompt
    Pray for the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary

    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18277
    • Reputation: +5670/-1958
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Another report of Prevost protecting child sɛҳuąƖ abuser
    « Reply #3 on: May 10, 2025, 02:27:44 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • This should disqualify him as pope.  He judges our vice president while he enabled rapists
    May God bless you and keep you

    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18277
    • Reputation: +5670/-1958
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Another report of Prevost protecting child sɛҳuąƖ abuser
    « Reply #4 on: May 10, 2025, 02:32:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • How can any pope who condoned child rape ever be a saint?

    This isn’t Catholic. 
    May God bless you and keep you


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46456
    • Reputation: +27354/-5049
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Another report of Prevost protecting child sɛҳuąƖ abuser
    « Reply #5 on: May 10, 2025, 03:13:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • We could start calling him ... Pervost.

    Apart from his inaction, his coverups, and his shuffling predators around ... Pervost strikes me as registering quite high on the gαydar himself, especially when you see that picture of him with JP2.

    Offline Cera

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6425
    • Reputation: +2947/-1523
    • Gender: Female
    • Pray for the consecration of Russia to Mary's I H
    Re: Another report of Prevost protecting child sɛҳuąƖ abuser
    « Reply #6 on: May 10, 2025, 03:13:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • How Prevost covered up the coverup (and much more).

    https://newdailycompass.com/en/paedophile-priests-cover-up-casts-shadows-over-prevost-cardinal-who-selects-bishops


    excerpt:

    Cardinal Prevost had one of his friends and confreres appointed to be his successor, who in fact immediately set about ‘cleaning up’ the Prefect's past. Not only did he put up a wall of silence against journalists who tried to investigate the allegations against Father Lute, eventually deciding to publish a communiqué on 10 September that the three alleged victims promptly challenged. But he has obstructed in every way the work of the canon lawyer, Monsignor Ricardo Coronado Arrascue, who since 6 May 2024 has taken on the legal protection of the three women accusing Father Lute and Cardinal Prevost: first by refusing to meet him and then by rejecting the legitimacy of his appointment (photo on the left), so that he could be denied access to the docuмents relating to the investigation.
    Not only that, a veritable concentric attack was launched against Coronado: on 24 August, the Peruvian Episcopal Conference announced that Monsignor Coronado could no longer practise as a canonist in Peru and therefore could not continue to defend his current clients. A decision that curiously anticipated the letter of 29 August in which the bishop of Cajamarca (the canonist's diocese of origin) informed him that a file had been filed against him with the Dicastery of the Clergy at the Vatican for an alleged unspecified crime ‘contra sextum' (but the Daily Compass sources speak of a stable relationship with a consenting adult); and that the same Dicastery offers him the possibility of making a voluntary request to the Pope to ask for dispensation from the priesthood under penalty of ‘the start of an administrative criminal trial’. Then a communiqué of the Permanent Council of the Bishops' Conference published on 14 September (photo on the right) justifies precisely with the start of the criminal trial the decision to prohibit Coronado from working in the ecclesiastical courts announced on 24 August. If we think of the slowness and reticence in the Vatican regarding recent sɛҳuąƖ abuse scandals, the speed and severity of the measures against Monsignor Coronado (who, moreover, denies all the accusations) are surprising and more than a little suspicious, given also that it is not a question of abuse but possibly of relations between consenting adults.
    In short, there is enough to demand that full light be shed on the affair and whether Cardinal Prevost should be kept in his post in the meantime.
     


    Pray for the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary

    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18277
    • Reputation: +5670/-1958
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Another report of Prevost protecting child sɛҳuąƖ abuser
    « Reply #7 on: May 10, 2025, 04:15:06 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • How about they protect the real “poor” and “marginalized” the child victims who were raped by priests and covered up by these “popes”
    May God bless you and keep you


    Offline Geremia

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4704
    • Reputation: +1532/-361
    • Gender: Male
      • St. Isidore e-book library
    Niles on Prevost
    « Reply #8 on: May 10, 2025, 10:12:01 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • St. Isidore e-book library: https://isidore.co

    Offline Persto

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1145
    • Reputation: +319/-28
    • Gender: Female
    • Persevere...Fear not, nor be any way discouraged
    Re: Another report of Prevost protecting child sɛҳuąƖ abuser
    « Reply #9 on: May 20, 2025, 11:42:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • https://www.gloria.tv/post/yDvJAhTZLSKB6arTMjF2CgSiB

    Suspicious Pressure on Catholic Media Because of Allegations of Cover-Up against Bishop Prevost

    There was pressure against Catholic media outlets that reported on the handling of alleged abuse cases involving Leo XIV when he was Bishop of Chiclayo in Peru. The first part explains the rather harmless Peruvian case; the second part covers the events of recent days.

    Three women from the Diocese of Chiclayo, Peru, claimed that they were fondled by two priests, Eleuterio Vásquez-Gonzales and Ricardo Yesquen, aged 10 to 14, between 2007 and 2010.

    The most enterprising of the three is Ana Maria Quispe Diaz. She contacted Bishop Robert Prevost by telephone in early 2020. Restrictions due to the covid-hysteria prevented a meeting in person. Bishop Prevost received all three of them on 5 April 2022. He directed the women to a Catholic listening centre. He also invited them to file a complaint with the prosecution, but the statute of limitations for fondling is four years.

    In January 2023, Francis appointed Prevost as Prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops, making him a cardinal in September of that year.
    In December 2023, Ana María Quispe Díaz shared her perspective on the case on social media, claiming that she had identified seven additional victims.

    Following media attention, the diocese opened a case under the authority of Apostolic Administrator.

    In September 2024, the diocese claimed that Bishop Prevost had already launched a preliminary canonical investigation and removed Father Lute, disqualifying him from exercising the priestly ministry.  The diocese also stated that all material relating to the diocesan investigation had been sent to the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith in July 2022.

    However, the three women countered this statement. They provided photographic evidence showing that Father Vásquez continued to celebrate Eucharists, including at the diocese's Chrism Mass.

    They never received proof of the alleged preliminary investigation of Bishop Prevost, nor did they see any decree on the imposition of measures against the priest. They were never summoned for formal testimony, nor did they see proof of the transmission of docuмents to the Vatican.

    In February 2024, Francis appointed Bishop Edinson Farfán Córdova as Bishop of Chiclayo. He is a personal friend of Cardinal Prevost and a member of the Augustinian Order. Prevost participated in Farfán's episcopal consecration.  The new bishop refused to answer questions from journalists investigating the allegations.

    Furthermore, Monsignor Ricardo Coronado Arrascue's work as a canon lawyer was quickly and effectively obscured.  On 6 May 2024, he had taken legal protection of the three women.  Bishop Farfán refused to meet the lawyer, rejected the legitimacy of his appointment, and thus denied him access to the acts.

    In August 2024, Cardinal Prevost returned to Peru to participate in the Diocese of Chulucanas' anniversary celebrations on 12 August, after which he spent a few days in his former diocese of Chiclayo.  On 24 August, the Peruvian Episcopal Conference announced that Monsignor Coronado could no longer practise as a canonist in Peru, meaning he could not continue to represent his current clients.

    On 29 August, the canonist received a letter from his bishop informing him that a file had been submitted to the Dicastery of the Clergy against him for the crime of a stable relationship with a woman. The Dicastery offered him the option of voluntarily requesting dispensation from the priesthood, or facing 'the start of an administrative criminal trial'.  Monsignor Coronado denies the accusations against him.

    Already days before the 8 May conclave, InfoVaticana.com leaked the relevant case docuмents.  On 5 May, two Infovaticana journalists met the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ activists James Martin, S.J., and Austen Ivereigh near the Vatican. The latter confronted them angrily and nervously, saying: "It's very interesting the campaign you are waging against Prevost."  After the meeting, InfoVaticana.com wrote on the same day: "His reaction left no room for doubt: Prevost was their man, the candidate in whom they had placed all their hopes."

    Following Leo XIV's election, Peruvian journalists Paola Ugaz and Pedro Salinas accused Catholic media of defaming the Pope and exonerating him of all charges.  These are the same journalists who, since 2015, have been waging a crusade against the now-dissolved 'Sodalitium Christianae Vitae' society, which was founded in 1971 by the abusive ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ Luis Figari. Cardinal Prevost himself dissolved the society, as Ugaz told Agensir, and Pope Francis signed the dissolution on 14 January.

    On 12 May, Paola Ugaz attended a meeting with Leo XIV and gave him a scarf, which he put on. However, the Italian bishops' newspaper Avvenire mysteriously published an interview with Ugaz and Salinas on 13 May, which appears to have been conducted in Peru by a special correspondent.

    On 17 May, Riccardo Cascioli of LaNuovaBq.it wrote: "In recent days, many (!) have written to our editorial office about my articles concerning the reported allegations of the cover-up of paedophile priests in Peru by Robert Prevost." They asked for the previous articles on the case to be changed.  Cascioli clarified that he stands by his articles.

    Persevere...
    Fear not, nor be any way discouraged- Duet.1:21

    Online Seraphina

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3882
    • Reputation: +2896/-276
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Another report of Prevost protecting child sɛҳuąƖ abuser
    « Reply #10 on: May 20, 2025, 12:07:05 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Only God can (and will) straighten out this mess. Just like the governments of the world, I don’t think anyone at higher up levels is free of filth in this matter.