Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Another Look at the SSPXs Illogical Stance on the Pope Question  (Read 459 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lover of Truth

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8700
  • Reputation: +1158/-863
  • Gender: Male
Another Look at the SSPXs Illogical Stance on the Pope Question
« on: May 10, 2013, 02:11:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Logged
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church

    Offline Matto

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6882
    • Reputation: +3849/-406
    • Gender: Male
    • Love God and Play, Do Good Work and Pray
    Another Look at the SSPXs Illogical Stance on the Pope Question
    « Reply #1 on: May 10, 2013, 02:27:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • According to this article, Fellay said:
    Quote
    no, we cannot accept what you are asking because for sure there are errors in the Council texts themselves, the errors of ecuмenism, of collegiality, of religious liberty. We cannot accept the errors of the Council and the New Mass.


    I am glad to hear it, because I thought Fellay now believed that there were no errors in the council, only in the interpretation of the council.

    I am glad to have been mistaken.
    Logged
    R.I.P.
    Please pray for the repose of my soul.

    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5767
    • Reputation: +4620/-480
    • Gender: Male
    Another Look at the SSPXs Illogical Stance on the Pope Question
    « Reply #2 on: May 10, 2013, 03:29:05 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Matto
    According to this article, Fellay said:
    Quote
    no, we cannot accept what you are asking because for sure there are errors in the Council texts themselves, the errors of ecuмenism, of collegiality, of religious liberty. We cannot accept the errors of the Council and the New Mass.


    I am glad to hear it, because I thought Fellay now believed that there were no errors in the council, only in the interpretation of the council.

    I am glad to have been mistaken.


    I don't think you were mistaken.  Wading through the various comments made by Bishop Fellay and other SSPX officials, it seems to me that he went from talking about the errors in the council to the problem being only that the interpretations of the council were faulty and, now, back to errors in the council.

    This 360 degree turn over the past year or two is why, I think, there is a "Resistance".  I am just concerned that I don't know what the "official" view of the bishop will be 9 to 15 months from now.  Is he back "on course" or will he continue a slow turn?

    I simply don't know.
    Logged
    Pages: [1]
    « previous next »