Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Another good two sister lucys article from tradition in action  (Read 1134 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sedetrad

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1585
  • Reputation: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male


Offline Elizabeth

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4845
  • Reputation: +2194/-15
  • Gender: Female
Another good two sister lucys article from tradition in action
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2013, 11:01:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  It was good thinking to compare only nuns.


    Offline Capt McQuigg

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4671
    • Reputation: +2624/-10
    • Gender: Male
    Another good two sister lucys article from tradition in action
    « Reply #2 on: January 23, 2013, 11:13:47 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Facial patterns don't really seem to change and comparing nuns is a great idea because they strictly follow a pattern and aren't out there getting cosmetic work done all the time...

    ...but even in a case of cosmetic surgery, the bone structure surrounding the eyes would specifically require surgery to change it.  

    You know, if it wasn't for all the other nonsense from the novus ordo and the way novus ordites will say anything to cover up for them, then we could really just drop the whole thing.

    However, with all the adventures of the last 50 years and how they lied to Traditionalists' faces about the "for all" and "for many" and then under cover of confusion snuck the "for many" back in there....

    When viewed in the light of the totality of the deception over the last 50 years, I'd say that I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt to the people who believe in the "two Sister Lucia" story.

    I certainly see no reason to arbitrarily disbelieve them.  

    I think the burden of proof should be switched to the novus ordites to prove their case.

    Offline Capt McQuigg

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4671
    • Reputation: +2624/-10
    • Gender: Male
    Another good two sister lucys article from tradition in action
    « Reply #3 on: January 23, 2013, 11:40:14 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Tradition in Action website should dedicate a chunk of time and collect hundreds of examples of photos of nuns, priests and famous actors or actresses and show their young days / old days.  

    Now, I know that the novus ordites will still deny the basic premise but the point of TIA increasing its database of young version/old version is to bulwark their own argument.  

    Who knows?  Maybe TIA will assemble thousands of photos and find out that they don't have a case based on maxi/mandi skeletal structure.  

    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Another good two sister lucys article from tradition in action
    « Reply #4 on: January 23, 2013, 01:24:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    famous actors or actresses and show their young days / old days.


    I would leave out the actors and actresses because they tend to have facial and cosmetic surgery and tend to use copious amounts of alcohol and various drugs. Thepurpose of using nun pictures was to show faces of people that didn't alter themselves drastically due to alcohol and drugs.

    I doubt Sister Lucy was an alcoholic, chronic meth user, or drug addict. I also doubt that she had any facial surgery in her life.


    Offline Marlelar

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3473
    • Reputation: +1816/-233
    • Gender: Female
    Another good two sister lucys article from tradition in action
    « Reply #5 on: January 26, 2013, 07:54:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think the difference in bone structure above the eyes in Sr. Lucy 2 says it all.

    I've also read the same thing about Paul VI, but in his case it is the ears and nose that are different.

    Marsha