Author Topic: Another Exploxive Issue (Read 665 times)

poche · « **on:** October 09, 2015, 12:45:29 AM »

In the latest in a series of Letters from the Synod, "Xavier Rynne" calls attention to a passage of the instrumentum laboris, or working docuмent, that open the way for allowing Protestants to receive Communion in the Catholic Church.

Paragraph #128 of the instrumentum laboris has not received much attention, "Rynne" remarks. But that paragraph could be read as a justification for allowing the reception of Communion by a Protestant who is married to a Catholic. The passage suggests that it could be deemed a case of "grave necessity" if baptized Christians are married to Catholics and "their own pastors are not available." That language could be interpretted liberally to apply to many Protestants who are married to Catholics.

http://www.catholic culture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=26359

http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/commentandblogs/2015/10/08/letters-from-the-synod-october-8-2015/

poche · « **Reply #1 on:** October 14, 2015, 12:54:48 AM »

An English archbishop has suggested that the ban on intercommunion between Catholics and Anglicans might be “reconsidered” in light of ecuмenical advances.

Archbishop Bernard Longley of Birmingham—the co-chairman of the Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission (ARCIC)—told the Church of Ireland Gazette that a 1993 Vatican docuмent allows for intercommunion under certain unusual circuмstances. When asked whether those conditions could be expanded to allow broader access to Communion by Anglicans, he replied:

My personal view is, you are right to draw attention to the changes which we have already seen on the basis of a deeper theological understanding of one another’s churches.

http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=26406

It is my observation that the Anglicans have advanced away from the situation which would allow for intercommunion.

2Vermont · « **Reply #2 on:** October 14, 2015, 04:20:39 AM »

The 1983 Code already allows non-Catholics to receive communion without conversion .... unlike the 1917 Code. So the Vatican II church has already headed down that slippery slope.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #3 on:** October 14, 2015, 05:23:23 AM »

Quote from: 2Vermont

The 1983 Code already allows non-Catholics to receive communion without conversion .... unlike the 1917 Code. So the Vatican II church has already headed down that slippery slope.

Indeed. It is fairly well recognized now that Vatican II primarily, and therefore the fallout from it, is not just heretical but APOSTASY.

There are several Cardinals (maybe even more now) who don't really believe in the Blessed Sacrament, don't believe that Christ is God (but that He "became" God) and following the apostasy of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin of infalicitous memory, man becomes God. The unclean spirit of Vatican II does not sleep.

So it's nothing new. In the 4th century there was only ONE BISHOP who held fast to the Traditions handed down from the Apostles, while the rest of the Church leaders, EVEN THE POPE, had fallen into the heresy of Arianism (but the pope was still the pope). God raised St. Athanasius to protect the Church in that time, whence we have the Athanasian Creed (one of the 3 Creeds of the Catholic Church).

It is highly improbable that anything really GOOD will come of this synod, since the participants are all under the cloud of apostasy. The fruits of a bad tree will never be good.

.