I see Taylor Marshall as someone who is slowly evolving as a Catholic and anyone who
directs others to the rosary is likely to keep going in the right direction.
He has a big family, God bless him, and he has to support it somehow so I don't
necessarily see him as a grifter.
In these unprecedented times of confusion we're all bound to have the wrong view
at some point or another on the faith.
I think we need to balance what good a person does against the bad so I'm reluctant
to dog pile on Ann. She no doubt helped a lot of people struggling with covid with ivermectin.
Salza on the other hand is just a bad actor

Indeed, I cannot fault anything you say in your post.

We've all been wrong, most of us many times. But only a few of us make money selling to others what we're wrong about.

Most of us keep quiet or post on forums, where we receive no remuneration; and most importantly, where our ideas are subject to real scrutiny and sometimes even violent oppositions.

Keeps the soul honest and humble, and the wallet spare!

Blessed are the poor!!! LOL!!

I don’t trust any of them.  Most of them are narcissists. 

I trust people here on Cathinfo, even the ones I don’t agree with on certain topics.  There may be some narcissists on here but they are trying to grow in their faith.

I think going door to door evangelizing works.  I even thought about doing mailings. 

Going door to door with the Legion of Mary actually was quite surprising when I participated, ( 15 years ago) You would be surprised how many non- Catholics are interested in what you have to say about the Church. People were very friendly- a lot of people were just glad to talk to someone. I can't imagine what it would be like today post-COVID. Another world entirely.

I wasn’t sure who this woman was so I went to YouTube to view one of her videos. 

My-my she’s aggressive. Her foul language and machoism made me feel a little embarrassed. What person with a Catholic sense would listen to a woman who acts like that and take her word on anything. 

She has a sharp mind but seems to be unhinged.  Think of the wonderful things she could do for Christ and his kingdom if she’d remove herself from her public pedestal and start acting like a lady.  

I especially don't get the men who follow her.

Yes! I thought the exact same thing when reading the comments from men praising her on the 1 video I watched. 

“Okay, to return to the OP, this is a thread about Ann Barnhardt and Narcissism,

Certainly, there are people going into the blogosphere with battleplans and intentions.  Voris comes to mind.  Marshall as well.  Voris appears to have been looking for a grift, though I didn’t think so at first.  Marshall was a former Episcopalian priest, so his life and career were already pivoted around religion.  I’m not so sure his mission is to grift, so much as it is to continue a career that involves his religious conviction.  Remember Skojec?  Yeah, I feel he was grifting, for sure.”

Laramie,

The hired grifters or “talking heads” strike me as a part of the final phase of the spiritual psy-ops by our enemies.

For example, Michael Voris is a freak trad fabrication from Opus Dei’s fertile recruiting grounds at Notre Dame. 

He appeared out of nowhere, producing his shows from an Opus Dei office building.

There we’re (3) Voris shows where he really came out, to show his masonic colors. 
They dealt with promotions of the h0l0hoax, the Noahide Laws and Opus Dei itself.

So too for Taylor Marshall, an admitted Jєω and admirer of Escriva and Opus Dei exploded onto the social media platforms and is ubiquitous now.

Like Malachi Martin, they function as confidence-men, who infiltrate and have the mission to confuse or misdirect what’s left of the Catholic faithful.

As you said, let's look at the actual quote:

This is deeply troubling to me. The kathekon of 2 Thess. is a spiritual power in heaven (the Holy Ghost) who acts through the Church, and consequently through the pope, as the Church's head. The "witholding" of 2 Thess. is metaphorically expressed by the "keys" and the "binding and loosing" language of Matt. 16. This language or metaphorical sense is carried over to Apoc. 20 when it speaks of Satan being "bound" for 1,000 years and then being "loosed."

The Holy Ghost acts through the Church/pope, and of course the Church/pope sometimes utilizes secular power and authority to accomplish its ends. Holy Ghost (the ultimate spiritual power, God, heaven) - Church/pope (spiritual power on earth) - kings, governments (the secular power on earth).

So, what happens in the secular sphere of ultimate spiritual consequence through governments/kings does indeed reflect what is happening or being directed from above, initiated by heaven - as Christ said Caesar would have no power over Him if not given from above - through the "loosing" or "binding" of the spiritual authority's representative on earth - e.g. the High Priest and Sanhedrin handing Christ over to Caesar to be crucified.

It could simply be a translation issue, but making the success/failure of the "katechon" conditional and as depending upon the election or non-election of a secular political figure is very disturbing. It may be that the removal of the "katechon" (the Church/pope) or the failure of its power to withhold unleashes a chaotic "loosing" that reverberates into a political nightmare in the secular governance of the world, but to say if a certain political figure fails to get elected then the "katechon" has failed is askew and shows a lack of true balance as to what is going on and the powers that direct it.

As I said, it could be a translation issue. But I see this tendency in Vigano of giving what happens in the secular realm - the NWO, etc. - sometimes a primacy or emphasis that it should not be given: what happens there is not determinative or ultimate, but is simply a reflection of what is. Perhaps this is why I get the sense (as do others) that he, while recognizing the problems with V2 and the Conciliar religion and making some very strong statements against it, has failed to, as of yet, "close the deal" in his final analysis of the crisis.

Vigano has proclaimed three linchpins to the Katechon:

1.  Trump
2.  Benedict
3.  Moscow (the Third Rome)


What do they all hold in common?

None of them hold to the Catholic Faith.

Trump is the greatest promoter of the NWO by overseeing the pandemic farce and Operation Warpspeed to bring the gene editing death shot to the world.   How can he be a Katechon?

Benedict proclaimed "as pope" that all religions lead to Heaven and prayed at the wailing wall and in ѕуηαgσgυєs (where they pray to USHER IN the Antichrist).  How can he be a Katechon??

Moscow sees itself as the THIRD ROME built on the ashes of the Catholic Church.   Um....that's not a Catholic idea much less some kind of Katechon.

Whoah, Whoah!  Marshall’s a Jєω?  Source, please.  I’ve GOT to see this.

I know he has Opis Dei friends.  So does EMJ.  This does not mean they, themselves, are Opus Dei.  That said, without a doubt, EMJ is influenced—at the least—by his Opus Dei colleagues.

But yeah.  Direct me to the Marshall/Jєω connection, please. 

By no means exhaustive but a beginning down the Taylor Marshall rabbit hole:


https://twitter.com/search?q=%402022moshiachnow%20marshall&src=recent_search_click


He named his son after Opus Dei Escriva.  He says his "inner Jew" was speaking for him as he wrote his books....

it goes on.

Some allegations are over the top, but others are on target.