My best guess is that the puppeteers told her to do it. For no one, I repeat, no one can be a bennyvacantist except there is money and power and an agenda behind the scenes. 

Let me help.  "Katechon" can and has been interpreted in different ways.  He does not see Trump as THE katechon, nor does he view there to be a single "katechon", but his reference to the "final" katechon means that he's basically using this in the sense of "the last domino will fall" before the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr comes into full control.  Elsewhere he mentioned Ratziner as another "katechon", and that is alluded to here when refers to the advent of Bergoglio, then the fall of the US (via fraudulent election) into a complete takeover by the NWO.

While I believe that both Trump and Bergoglio are active participants in the destruction of the Church, +Vigano clearly views "katechon" as a series of things not a single thing and does not refer to Trump as THE katechon.

Nor does being a "katechon" necessarily mean that one is a valiant defender of the faith.  So, for instance, one might view Pius XII as a "katechon", as a critical turning point or watershed, even though he contributed mightily to ushering in the Vatican II era.

Another interpretation of "katechon" is actually the opposite, where the "man of sin" is the "katechon" (obstacle or final prelude) before Our Lord's Second Coming.

I myself believe that it refers to the Catholic papacy, which "fell" (so to speak) after the death of Pius XII.

If Trump loses the presidential elections, the final kathèkon [withholder] will fail (2 Thess 2:6-7), that which prevents the “mystery of iniquity” from revealing itself, and the dictatorship of the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr, which has already won Bergoglio over to its cause, will have an ally in the new American President.

As you said, let's look at the actual quote:

This is deeply troubling to me. The kathekon of 2 Thess. is a spiritual power in heaven (the Holy Ghost) who acts through the Church, and consequently through the pope, as the Church's head. The "witholding" of 2 Thess. is metaphorically expressed by the "keys" and the "binding and loosing" language of Matt. 16. This language or metaphorical sense is carried over to Apoc. 20 when it speaks of Satan being "bound" for 1,000 years and then being "loosed."

The Holy Ghost acts through the Church/pope, and of course the Church/pope sometimes utilizes secular power and authority to accomplish its ends. Holy Ghost (the ultimate spiritual power, God, heaven) - Church/pope (spiritual power on earth) - kings, governments (the secular power on earth).

So, what happens in the secular sphere of ultimate spiritual consequence through governments/kings does indeed reflect what is happening or being directed from above, initiated by heaven - as Christ said Caesar would have no power over Him if not given from above - through the "loosing" or "binding" of the spiritual authority's representative on earth - e.g. the High Priest and Sanhedrin handing Christ over to Caesar to be crucified.

It could simply be a translation issue, but making the success/failure of the "katechon" conditional and as depending upon the election or non-election of a secular political figure is very disturbing. It may be that the removal of the "katechon" (the Church/pope) or the failure of its power to withhold unleashes a chaotic "loosing" that reverberates into a political nightmare in the secular governance of the world, but to say if a certain political figure fails to get elected then the "katechon" has failed is askew and shows a lack of true balance as to what is going on and the powers that direct it.

As I said, it could be a translation issue. But I see this tendency in Vigano of giving what happens in the secular realm - the NWO, etc. - sometimes a primacy or emphasis that it should not be given: what happens there is not determinative or ultimate, but is simply a reflection of what is. Perhaps this is why I get the sense (as do others) that he, while recognizing the problems with V2 and the Conciliar religion and making some very strong statements against it, has failed to, as of yet, "close the deal" in his final analysis of the crisis.

You raise a good point that there's a subtle financial incentive behind Bennyvacantism.

See, a lot of people that make their living off their Internet Celebrity, their websites, podcats, Youtube videos, etc. ... they stand to lose a huge percentage of their financial support if they go full-blown sedevacantist.  So this is a compromise position.  "I'm not one of these crazy sedevacantists.  I'm on board with Vatican II and the New Mass and Saint JP2 the Great, etc."

Now that Benny is dead, there's no actual difference between the Bennyvacantists and the Sedevacantists regarding the current state of the Church.  They're divided ONLY on the principle of whether the Crisis goes back to Vatican II, the NOM, Roncalli, Montini, Wojtyla, Ratzinger ... or whether it started the day Jorge got elected.

Darn good post!!!

Fitts is really creepy.

Ever notice there are no real Catholics in the alt media?