Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7

Author Topic: Angelus June 1982  (Read 1053 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Maria Dolorosa

Re: Angelus June 1982
« Reply #15 on: May 15, 2026, 03:55:28 PM »
Quote from: Gray2023 on May 15, 2026, 02:12:32 PM
There has never been in the history of the Church one man sitting on the throne of Peter, yet destroying that seat.  We do not have church teaching.  We have church guessing.  The r and r side destroys obedience based on trying to figure it out ourselves because you can't follow a man who leads you away from Catholicism.  The Sede position essentially is saying the Apostolic succession has died.  Jesus made the promise that the Church would survive to the end of time.  We all are confused.  Yet some of you think you know the answer and destroy and condemn everyone who disagrees with you and that is a breakdown of humility and charity.  So you antiThucists just stop.  You are not helping.  You are causing anger and you will be responsible for that.
Good to know your thoughts.
Logged

Offline Maria Dolorosa

Re: Angelus June 1982
« Reply #16 on: May 15, 2026, 03:57:16 PM »
Quote from: WorldsAway on May 15, 2026, 02:37:30 PM
You two are unbelievable lmao. The Angelus claimed that +Thuc published the letter. Where did he publish it? When? Why did The Angelus not provide a single direct quote from the letter?  Not a single copy of such an important letter was was ever made? Do you seriously believe that this "letter" would not have been plastered EVERYWHERE in Trad world if it had actually existed? This is alleged to have happened less than 50 years ago. Don't act like it would've had to have been copied by hand, packed in a wooden trunk and then brought across the Atlantic by boat



Are you aware that Archbishop Lefebvre is directly quoted a number of times as saying he saw with his "own eyes", in a publication of Chiesa Viva, a picture of Cardinal Liénart decked out in Freemasonic regalia? Are you aware that it was discovered that no issue of Chiesa Viva ever contained a picture of Liénart as just described? Uncanny similarity
Interesting.
Logged

Offline Gray2023

  • Supporter
Re: Angelus June 1982
« Reply #17 on: May 15, 2026, 04:15:02 PM »
Quote from: Maria Dolorosa on May 15, 2026, 03:34:25 PM
I said I was not here to argue. Please respect that.

As far as I can tell, avoiding the +Thuc line is the most prudent course of action.

We are all responsible for our own souls, and I have merely presented information here for others to consider. I am not an authority, nor am I imposing it on anyone.

If my posts bother you this much, feel free to put me on ignore.

God bless.
If you are not ready for a debate, then don't post debatable material.  This respect you ask for, is it reasonable when you imply that those who do not agree with you are stupid and influenced by demons. I think you need to take a breather from this +Thuc topic and assess whether you are being used by the devil to stir up a hornets nest.
Logged

Offline Lazarus

Re: Angelus June 1982
« Reply #18 on: May 15, 2026, 04:16:16 PM »
Quote from: Maria Dolorosa on May 15, 2026, 03:34:25 PM
I said I was not here to argue. Please respect that.

As far as I can tell, avoiding the +Thuc line is the most prudent course of action.

We are all responsible for our own souls, and I have merely presented information here for others to consider. I am not an authority, nor am I imposing it on anyone.

If my posts bother you this much, feel free to put me on ignore.

God bless.
:facepalm:

When there is a lack of reliable evidence, the prudent course of action is to avoid the risk of calumniating someone even by accident. In that case, it's far worse because it is not merely calumniating one person but potentially all the priests from the Thuc line.

Sowing division inside the traditionalist movement based on paranoia is doing the Devil's work. I am confident that I am not the only Catholic who is getting sick of how "traditionalist" priests mercilessly tear each other apart instead of attacking the common Vatican II enemy.

If you do not have anything useful or good to say it is far better to have the humility to stay silent. 
Logged

Offline TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: Angelus June 1982
« Reply #19 on: May 15, 2026, 05:34:22 PM »
I want these losers to keep going.

You are all digging your hole so deep that its great for our cause.


you made up a term only 10 years ago called R and R, to try to paint our position into a corner, and to try to reform the sede image with a more polished CMRI.


It ultimately can't kind the stench that is the Thuc legacy. Which is why you all sperg out so much when pointed out with the fruits of his line, Thucs madness, and the fact that he withheld intention not once but twice. Incredible.


Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7
« previous next »