Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Angelus June 1982  (Read 1032 times)

1 Member and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Angelus June 1982
« Reply #20 on: May 15, 2026, 05:35:58 PM »
If you are not ready for a debate, then don't post debatable material.  This respect you ask for, is it reasonable when you imply that those who do not agree with you are stupid and influenced by demons. I think you need to take a breather from this +Thuc topic and assess whether you are being used by the devil to stir up a hornets nest.
It is demonic to deny the reasonable suspicion of simulated Sacraments.

Drop your attachment to Thuc line priests and come to the sanity that is The Lefbvre Williamson line.

Re: Angelus June 1982
« Reply #21 on: May 15, 2026, 06:11:22 PM »
I want these losers to keep going.

You are all digging your hole so deep that its great for our cause.


you made up a term only 10 years ago called R and R, to try to paint our position into a corner, and to try to reform the sede image with a more polished CMRI.


It ultimately can't kind the stench that is the Thuc legacy. Which is why you all sperg out so much when pointed out with the fruits of his line, Thucs madness, and the fact that he withheld intention not once but twice. Incredible.
How pathetic.

Still pretending to be from the Resistance? 

You must be here to make them look insane and sabotage their movement. 

 




Re: Angelus June 1982
« Reply #22 on: May 15, 2026, 07:06:31 PM »
If you are not ready for a debate, then don't post debatable material.  This respect you ask for, is it reasonable when you imply that those who do not agree with you are stupid and influenced by demons. I think you need to take a breather from this +Thuc topic and assess whether you are being used by the devil to stir up a hornets nest.
If we are to determine whether something is pleasing to God or not by the reaction of others, we would not have the Crucifixion, we would not have  St. Joan of Arc burnt at the stake, and countless other saints who made the wicked angry.

I never said the counter position was demonic or stupid in itself, it depends on how informed and culpable a person is on the matter. I said the manner in which people act on here sometimes is demonic, which I know you agree with. I also have never called someone stupid, that's on you. When I said to use your mind, I meant to use your reason, not read more books.

What I am doing is objectively not provocative. Emotional immaturity is not mine to fix.

It's your opinion that it is debatable. Rational people look at this and think about it, they do not need to argue.

I am sure there are many innocent, well intentioned people who visit this website, whether members or not, who deserve to have this information easily accessible, and I am not going to allow a few people who act like animals silence what should not be silenced.

The crisis in the Church is here and prolonged so because of cowardly silence. Enough.

Re: Angelus June 1982
« Reply #23 on: May 15, 2026, 07:26:13 PM »
How pathetic.

Still pretending to be from the Resistance?

You must be here to make them look insane and sabotage their movement.

 
:jester::jester::jester:

Online Gray2023

  • Supporter
Re: Angelus June 1982
« Reply #24 on: Yesterday at 08:32:39 AM »
If we are to determine whether something is pleasing to God or not by the reaction of others, we would not have the Crucifixion, we would not have  St. Joan of Arc burnt at the stake, and countless other saints who made the wicked angry.

I never said the counter position was demonic or stupid in itself, it depends on how informed and culpable a person is on the matter. I said the manner in which people act on here sometimes is demonic, which I know you agree with. I also have never called someone stupid, that's on you. When I said to use your mind, I meant to use your reason, not read more books.

What I am doing is objectively not provocative. Emotional immaturity is not mine to fix.

It's your opinion that it is debatable. Rational people look at this and think about it, they do not need to argue.

I am sure there are many innocent, well intentioned people who visit this website, whether members or not, who deserve to have this information easily accessible, and I am not going to allow a few people who act like animals silence what should not be silenced.

The crisis in the Church is here and prolonged so because of cowardly silence. Enough.
The crisis is prolonged due to disobedience.

It is schism to say Pope Leo is the pope and not follow him.

You continually do not address this. 

If the +Thuc line is wrong, then so is the +Lefebvre line.  Both lines did things out of order with Catholicismi.  Why? Because the Popes started pushing heresy.

Which resistance bishop supports your thought process?  Which resistance bishop is stating that they are the only Catholics left.

And I repeat it is very demonic to break up a family.  Fatima warned us about it.  And both you (Maria) and Tom are encouraging me to go against mine.  Tom said apostasy is a seperatable offense.  Let's use some reason.  Who wants the family destroyed?