Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: An Objection to Sedevacantism: Perpetual Successors to Peter  (Read 16117 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

An Objection to Sedevacantism: Perpetual Successors to Peter
« Reply #105 on: August 31, 2012, 04:28:41 PM »
Quote from: SJB
Quote from: Malleus
It is a controverted question whether the bishops hold their jurisdiction directly from God or from the sovereign pontiff. The latter opinion, however, is almost generally admitted at the present day, for it is more in conformity with the monarchical constitution of the Church, which seems to demand that there should be no power in the Church not emanating immediately from the sovereign pontiff.


It's no longer controverted. The question was settled by Pope Pius XII.



Which of course is Moot in an Interregnum

Offline SJB

An Objection to Sedevacantism: Perpetual Successors to Peter
« Reply #106 on: August 31, 2012, 05:22:47 PM »
Quote from: Malleus 01
Quote from: SJB
Quote from: Malleus
It is a controverted question whether the bishops hold their jurisdiction directly from God or from the sovereign pontiff. The latter opinion, however, is almost generally admitted at the present day, for it is more in conformity with the monarchical constitution of the Church, which seems to demand that there should be no power in the Church not emanating immediately from the sovereign pontiff.


It's no longer controverted. The question was settled by Pope Pius XII.



Which of course is Moot in an Interregnum


No, it is not. It is the teaching of the Church. This has been covered before in great detail.


An Objection to Sedevacantism: Perpetual Successors to Peter
« Reply #107 on: August 31, 2012, 05:31:26 PM »
Malleus,

The only traditional bishop I know that claims to be a successor of the Apostles by claiming jurisdiction is Bp. Vezelis, who I think claims jurisdiction over all Catholics in the Eastern U.S., or it may be the whole U.S.

Are you aware of any other traditional bishops who identify themselves as successors of the apostles, and by that claim jurisdiction?  If you are, please tell me so I can avoid them.

Offline SJB

An Objection to Sedevacantism: Perpetual Successors to Peter
« Reply #108 on: August 31, 2012, 06:26:25 PM »
Quote from: Ambrose
Malleus,

The only traditional bishop I know that claims to be a successor of the Apostles by claiming jurisdiction is Bp. Vezelis, who I think claims jurisdiction over all Catholics in the Eastern U.S., or it may be the whole U.S.

Are you aware of any other traditional bishops who identify themselves as successors of the apostles, and by that claim jurisdiction?  If you are, please tell me so I can avoid them.


Bp. Daniel L. Dolan believes he's a successor to the apostles.

An Objection to Sedevacantism: Perpetual Successors to Peter
« Reply #109 on: August 31, 2012, 06:30:03 PM »
Quote

Bp. Daniel L. Dolan believes he's a successor to the apostles.


Source?