.
Perhaps you should read this post again.
Or, did you fail to read it the first time?
.
A iti teal siro malan ach triba nalpa nama.*
.
The admission of public adulterers in so-called second marriages to Holy Communion
is intrinsically impossible.
It always has been and it always will be.
But that doesn't mean that in some places de facto heretics won't attempt to do it anyway.
Marriage is indissoluble and adultery is intrinsically immoral.
But Amoris Laetitia (AL) would have abstract ideas (divine precepts)
subverted by pastoral action in the "face of reality."
In this way a new "secret commission" tasked by Pope Bergoglio
seeks to reinterpret the constant teaching of the Church.
Effectively, a public adulterer would then be allowed
to continue his adultery while receiving Holy Communion.
Why? Well, ceasing his adultery is "more than he can give." That's why!
.
Now what we have is a first fallout of the objectively disordered Amoris Laetitia (AL).
It comes in the form of a reinterpretation of Humanae Vitae based on AL.
Pope Paul VI, liberal though he was, managed to do one thing right.
But one thing is one thing too much for the current "bishop of Rome."
Unable to overturn Humanae Vitae directly by frontal assault,
he has chosen to take a different path.
The catastrophic introduction of situation ethics into the life of the Church via AL
is now being extended.
It's now being extended to accommodate the intrinsic evil of contraception.
The intrinsic evil of contraception was affirmed by Pope Paul VI,
but today, that is not to be allowed to stand.
It must be torn down, and Pope Bergoglio has a plan:
A iti teal siro malan ach triba nalpa nama.*
.
Monsignor Gilfredo Marengo is the "coordinator" of the commission
nominated by Francis to "re-interpret" Humanae Vitae in the light of AL.
This, on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of HV's promulgation
which falls next year ( 2018 ).
This commission has been given the ominous task
of procuring some things from the Vatican archives.
Namely docuмentation on the preparatory work for HV which took place over 3 years.
Make that 3 years "during and after Vat.II."
"What did that preparatory work achieve?" one might ask (please ask now).
It resulted in the recommendation that the Church relax her teaching to permit contraception.
.
Say what?
.
That's correct (sic = as it appears)
Said preparatory work for HV recommended to Pope Paul VI
that the Church throw in the towel on her teaching.
However, Pope Paul VI, while otherwise quite a liberal,
set aside his liberal inclinations, some say miraculously.
He thusly acted perhaps under the influence of the Holy Ghost.
(Do you have a more plausible suggestion?)
He set aside his hankering for novelty just long enough
to protect the Church's infallible universal ordinary Magisterium.
That means what the Church has constantly taught
even without a formal, infallible dogmatic definition.
.
The unannounced plan is now to overthrow HV
by subterfuge since it was unassailable by frontal attack.
The planned mudus operandi of the pastoral abandonment
of the Church's infallible teaching
on the intrinsic evil of contraception would appear
to be the same as that which AL proposes
for the pastoral abandonment of the Church's teaching
on the intrinsic immorality of adultery
and thus the "intrinsically impossible" admission of public adulterers
in so-called second marriages to Holy Communion.
IOW what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
.
Leaving little doubt of the matter, Msgr. Marengo,
the very coordinator of the not-so-secret commission,
has already told Vatican Insider that
it's time to consider "abandoning a conception
of the doctrinal patrimony of the Church as a closed system,
impermeable to questions and provocations
of the here and now, in which the Christian community is
called to justify its faith through its proclamation and testimony."
.
In order to drive this point home, Marengo proposes
the classic Modernist opposition between
Catholic teaching and "the here and now,"
as if the mere passage of time could alter
immutable doctrines and dogmas rooted in divine revelation.
.
.
.
.
* Don't get it? (Read it backwards: A man, a plan, a birth canal, Amoris Laetitia.) The same difficulty you had with this simple puzzle is nothing compared to the conundrum of AL and its implications.