Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Amoris Laetitia  (Read 8118 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Amoris Laetitia
« Reply #45 on: October 20, 2017, 01:58:16 PM »
.
In the event that some readers of this thread 
might like to have a sample of the thinking (or is it non-thinking?)
of this particular prince of the Church named Marengo,
perhaps the following would fulfill that desire.
.
.
The polemical game - the pill yes - the pill no, 
like today's - Communion to the divorced yes - Communion to the divorced no -
is only an appearance of discomfort and strain much more decisive in the fabric of ecclesial life. [?]
.
Every time the Christian community falls into error and proposes models of life derived from too abstract 
and artificially constructed theological ideals, 
it conceives its pastoral action as the schematic application of a doctrinal paradigm.
.
[If that paragraph makes no sense the first time, read it again, and it will probably still make no sense!!]
.
A certain way of defending and acknowledging the teaching of Paul VI was probably one of the factors for which
we have presented a too abstract theological ideal on marriage, almost artificially constructed,
far from the concrete situation and the effective possibilities of families as they really are.
This excessive idealization, above all when we have reawakened trust in grace, 
has not made marriage more attractive and desirable, but quite the opposite.

.
.
If you're having trouble connecting the dots in this screed, perhaps it would help you to understand what is being attempted
by way of these words, if you recall that a certain condemned Modernist named Pierre Teilhard de Chardin made a name for 
himself by re-defining words or shall we say, by taking standard Catholic terminology and using the words in an entirely 
new context or application in such way that the whole of his writings would not make sense to a reader unless the 
reader would dare to presume that these erstwhile standard Catholic terms would no longer carry the same meaning 
they had previously, but instead take on, perhaps by a kind of osmosis or mysterious operation, a new meaning quite 
different from the old one, even perhaps approaching a meaning entirely OPPOSITE to what they had meant before.
.

Re: Amoris Laetitia
« Reply #46 on: October 28, 2017, 02:26:22 AM »
Among Argentine bishops, Bishop Martinez is joined by one of his predecessors in the see of San Luis, Bishop Juan Rodolfo Laise, O.F.M. Cap. Bishop Laise was among the first signatories of a Declaration of Fidelity to the Church's Unchangeable Teaching on Marriage and to Her Uninterrupted Discipline, which was publicized Aug. 29, 2016.
Bishop Laise, who led the San Luis diocese from 1971 to 2001, signed the declaration, which reaffirms the Church's teachings on marriage and morality. More than 879,000 persons have signed the docuмent, among whom are eight cardinals.

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/argentine-pastoral-letter-accompaniment-in-marriage-must-be-faithful-28749


Re: Amoris Laetitia
« Reply #47 on: October 28, 2017, 01:18:17 PM »
.
The Antichrist won't need a teleprompter.  (That's how we know Obama wasn't the Antichrist!)
.
But catholicnewsagency.com will no doubt be quite useful.
.

Re: Amoris Laetitia
« Reply #48 on: November 01, 2017, 02:08:34 AM »
In his pastoral letter, Bishop Martinez also reflected on the possible causes of the exhortation's “distinct interpretations.” He suggested the theological reasons for an inadequate evaluation of the ordinary Magisterium; an erroneous understanding of divine, public Revelation which sees it as a continual unfolding in history, in which the bishops can 'constitute' the deposit of faith, and not merely transmit, conserve, and defend it faithfully; and a dualistic conception of the Church, mistakenly perceiving a separation between dogma and morality, or between a visible institution and a “charismatic call.”
Martens commented to CNA that understanding the nature of Amoris laetitia’s teaching authority and intended purpose is critical to its interpretation.

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/argentine-pastoral-letter-accompaniment-in-marriage-must-be-faithful-28749

Re: Amoris Laetitia
« Reply #49 on: November 14, 2017, 12:11:44 PM »
In his pastoral letter, Bishop Martinez also reflected on the possible causes of the exhortation's “distinct interpretations.” He suggested the theological reasons for an inadequate evaluation of the ordinary Magisterium; an erroneous understanding of divine, public Revelation which sees it as a continual unfolding in history, in which the bishops can 'constitute' the deposit of faith, and not merely transmit, conserve, and defend it faithfully; and a dualistic conception of the Church, mistakenly perceiving a separation between dogma and morality, or between a visible institution and a “charismatic call.”
Martens commented to CNA that understanding the nature of Amoris laetitia’s teaching authority and intended purpose is critical to its interpretation.

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/argentine-pastoral-letter-accompaniment-in-marriage-must-be-faithful-28749
.
The useful idiot who keeps quoting the Communist catholicnewsagency strikes again............and again............and again...........
.