CathInfo.com

I believe it was. There was general conservatism from the likes of Catholic thinkers like Joe Sobran and others, not too mention the father of modern day conservatism Edmund Burke long before yids like Kristol and his tribe sacked the right not too long ago and culminated with the bloodthirsty zionist right wing stooges we have posing as "conservatives" today.

Your reply was to my statement that neoconservatism wasn't co-opted by Jews. It was quite openly started by Jews, so it wasn't co-opted. Like I said, Bill Kristol's father was behind it. Commentary magazine functioned as the house organ (which, incidentally, the crypto Al Pacino worked for the 60s in some low-level position). When I first got interested in politics in the late-90s it was the neoconservative First Things/Commentary/National Review/New Criterion neoconservative crowd that first got my attention. I quickly shifted to the Russell Kirk/Joe Sobran/Pat Buchanan Right. Now I know longer consider myself a right winger.

Sobran ultimately became disenchanted with the entire Conservative movement and began, ironically for someone who was anti-Jєωιѕн, to position himself with the Rothbard camp. You'd think he would have put two and two together and realized that the entire political arena is a Jєωιѕн rigged game, and that he should have eschewed Rothbard as well.

Jews on the Right came to dislike the term neoconservative because they thought it was being used as a code word for Jews.

Weak points, Laramie. Christendom started with Catholics who made no bones about being anti-Jєωιѕн.
The alt-right is the latest Jєωιѕн vehicle to corral a disaffected gentile group under a Jew umbrella.

Nah.  My points are good.  

Also, I'm not arguing that early Catholics weren't against Jews.  Don't know where that came from.  

No, the "Alt-Right" (if we're to give it a brand name) was not a Jєωιѕн vehicle to corral disaffected right-wingers.  It developed organically, starting after the Ron Paul Revolution.  Spencer, disciple/friend of Gottfried, an opportunist, and possible controlled opposition, then tried to capitalize on the movement, even giving it its name: Alt-Right.  During the 2016 election, Alt-Right simply meant an anti-political correctness movement.  But since then, I've seen Jews and white nationalists capitalize on this brand.  The term "Alt-Right movement" has meant different things at different times for different people, it seems.  It was always a nebulous term that couldn't be pinned down, much like the movement itself which didn't really have a leader.  There were only wings of the Alt-Right.  Sectors and quarters.  

But that is not to say that the Jews are not interested and fascinated by the phenomenon.  For example, I've recently learned about how Luke Ford, a Jєωιѕн convert, is utterly fascinated with everything Alt-Right.  I think that at this stage, the Alt-Right brand has definitely been infiltrated, and I think it's become a plaything for Jews.  I've started distancing myself from the brand name ever since you shared with me those links this spring.  

It doesn't matter, though.  The "Alt-Right Episode" was a flash in the pan for something greater.  Fact of the matter is, the Right is rising, and it is set to displace 20th Century liberalism.  Call the movement what you want, it isn't stopping.  There really isn't an "alternative right wing" any longer.  It's just, simply, Right.  It's rolling along like a snowball down a hill.  I imagine the spirit of this phenomenon will really show itself during political seasons.  But I also expect the cuckservatives to keep on cuckin'.  If it's one thing that I've learned in the last half-decade, it's that people RARELY break out of groupthink.

Here's a fun article: Richard Spencer Is Death - https://affirmativeright.blogspot.com/2018/06/richard-spencer-is-death.html