I respect St. Robert a great deal along with his findings...

I really don't think you do.

amounts to the Church purposely publishing and promulgating at least an erroneous encyclical or an outright fraudulent one for the last 1100 years.   

What are you muling about? 🫏

You eat "erroneous encyclicals from true Popes" everyday for breakfast from the post-concillars, so that is no argument in your favor.

What would the amount of time that has elapsed for a "Pope" to spread a false teaching to the Universal Church matter? It doesn't.

1 minute vs. 1100 years - it makes ZERO difference if it is a teaching on faith and morals for the whole Church.

It really just comes down to error in facts vs. doctrine as was clearly pointed out on page 1.

I really don't think you do.
What are you muling about? 🫏

You eat "erroneous encyclicals from true Popes" everyday for breakfast from the post-concillars, so that is no argument in your favor.

What would the amount of time that has elapsed for a "Pope" to spread a false teaching to the Universal Church matter? It doesn't.

1 minute vs. 1100 years - it makes ZERO difference if it is a teaching on faith and morals for the whole Church.

It really just comes down to error in facts vs. doctrine as was clearly pointed out on page 1.

Sshhhh, grown ups are trying to have a conversation here.

OK. Jackass.

I sure can be and I'm working on not doing that, and I am sorry for doing that, and I do apologize for my insulting you.

Now, instead of replying with snide remarks, can you give a legitimate and logical explanation for the elephant in the room, i.e.  that after 1344 years and 197 popes later, nobody has corrected the encyclical, or even labeled it with a disclaimer or warning, nor has anyone even said anything about it being fraudulent except St. Robert?

If you cannot do that, then as unpleasant, unbelievable and even blasphemous as it may be to you, it is still an indisputable fact that there is a binding and official Church docuмent from The Sixth Ecuмenical Council (also known as Third Council of Constantinople) which binds us to believe and which has stood the test of time for 1344 years and 197 popes so far, that a pope was a heretic and a pope at the same time.       

Meanwhile, poster ArmandLouis has posted additional sources confirming the legitimacy of the docuмent here and here. 

Whether you choose to believe it, blow it off or acknowledge it or not, there is an argument there. 

Now, don't change the subject  ANSWER MY QUESTION FIRST:

What would the amount of time that has elapsed for a "Pope" to spread a false teaching to the Universal Church matter?

Good heavens man, you cannot be that dense. 

Are you saying that you see nothing to the fact that 100s of popes, theologians and other religious  scholars said and did nothing whatsoever to correct the *alleged* fraud on an infallible council's docuмent? Not so much as one word by anyone in the Church's hierarchy since that Council (1344 years) condemning as a fraudulent act done by some of the Church's enemies, to one the docuмents of her infallible councils? 

You see this as nothing? You just blow it off as no big deal?

As for the White House letter, nobody expected them to get it 100% right, we say it is beautiful because they at least said SOMETHING good.
 

You see this as nothing? You just blow it off as no big deal?

As for the White House letter, nobody expected them to get it 100% right, we say it is beautiful because they at least said SOMETHING good.

You bash me for "blowing off" a factual error and then you just blow of an objective material heresy!

You are acting in a manner that PERFECTLY displays the meaning of the word, "hypocrite"

DEFEND THE HONOR OF CHRIST and HIS MOTHER - recant your seeming support for heretical statements issued by the mouths of heretics and public sinners. 

Don't make excuses for heresy.

You bash me for "blowing off" a factual error and then you just blow of an objective material heresy!

You are acting in a manner that PERFECTLY displays the meaning of the word, "hypocrite"

DEFEND THE HONOR OF CHRIST and HIS MOTHER - recant your seeming support for heretical statements issued by the mouths of heretics and public sinners.

Don't make excuses for heresy.

I don't need to make an excuse, you can reject popes as popes, after that, rejecting the Sixth Ecuмenical Council must be like child's play for you. 

Oh the Irony!

Here we have a "Stubborn" person yet living who blows of EXPLICIT OBJECTIVE MATERIAL HERESY issued publicly for all to consume, i.e. Trump, ""God became man when Mary gave birth to a son, Jesus," =  HERESY

This same "Stubborn" person wants to nitpick Pope Honorius' and his PRIVATE letters that were discovered after his death and affirm him a "heretic" (for his own evil end I might add). He wants YOU to affirm it too. He wants you to share in his errors.

What Honorius was accused of postmortem pales in comparison to the above.

A living person spewing heresy about the Incarnation - needs to be publicly corrected (which NCR did already). Those who PUBLICLY support this heretical statement need to be corrected publicly as well.

But, "no, no, lets just ignore that ENORMOUS and MONSTROUS insult to Christ and His Mother, which is actually impossible to honor Mary with anyway (as Dom Gueranger taught) but he even goes on to say, "HOW BEAUTIFUL, LOVELY, on top of it!

The hypocrisy is astonishing.

Sorry your butt got hurt because you failed to actually READ the heresy he spewed.

But now why quadruple down on your support for the heretical statement issued and "blow it off"?

Because, you are a pertinacious, stubborn, jackass - that is why.

If you won't recant please just please stop already, you are digging yourself in further and further with every post in defense of his heresy.

The sixth ecuмenical council would certainly pronounce - anathema against you - THIS INSTANT for your intransigent support of a heretical statement.

Honorius remains a true Pope - who stands accused of failing to defend the faith as he ought to have (when alive), You are all over him, while you, yourself - commit the actual crimes you would like to definitely smear him with and BLOW IT OFF AS NOTHING....

What a nitwit you are lol

The White house letter was written by non-Catholics and as they understand it. Have a little Understanding man and don't be so fired up to immediately condemn to hell everyone except yourself. I've heard a whole lot worse from non-Catholics. They are already going to hell, you should be surprised and even glad that they got as much correct as they did. Maybe you should work on getting rid of some or all of your bitterness. 

As for the heretic pope Honorius, the rest of us Catholics have no choice in the matter, we all must go with the encyclical from the Council.

The White House is filled with Protestants.  What they wrote was pretty pro/catholic, for a Protestant.  It wasn’t meant as a doctrinal dissertation.  You guys just expect WAY too much.  Almost borderline insane expectations. 

Unmet expectations = suffering.  Dial back your expectations and you dial back your blood pressure.

More from another one 

Isn't the VICE PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY OF STATE "CATHOLIC"  Yeah, I guess they aren't around much, so we should just excuse it some more right?

You cover for his heresy.

Go on then, dig us up some more Protestant Presidential quotes about Jesus, or his Mother and try to spin them as positive... 

I don't expect Trump to spew anything BUT heresy. Rather it is YOU I expect to know better - don't be a tard. 

P.S. *Blood pressure is only slightly elevated (due to your moronic intransigence), I have dealt with a fair amount of stress and this is nothing, I am however appalled at your lack of concerning for correcting error/heresy WHEREVER it is found. Now it is actually fine, it only took a few seconds to pass.