Paying tribute to the Second Vatican Council’s Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy as a liturgical “Magna Carta,” Cardinal Robert Sarah called for a more faithful implementation of its text, lamented misinterpretations of its teaching on “active participation,” and suggested an appendix to the Roman Missal that might better manifest the continuity of the extraordinary and ordinary forms of the celebration of the Mass.

“The liturgy is essentially the action of Christ,” the prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship wrote in the June 12 edition of L’Osservatore Romano. “If this vital principle is not received in faith, it is likely to make the liturgy a human work, a self-celebration of the community.”

He continued:


To speak of a ‘celebrating community’ is not without ambiguity and requires real caution. The participatio actuosa [active participation] should not therefore be understood as the need to do something. On this point the teaching of the Council has often been distorted. It is instead to let Christ take us and associate us with his sacrifice.
Citing the teaching of Pope Francis, Cardinal Sarah criticized the attitude of priests who make themselves the focal point of the liturgy.

“It is entirely consistent with the conciliar constitution, it is indeed opportune that, during the rite of penance, the singing of the Gloria, the orations, and the Eucharistic prayer, everyone, priest and faithful, should turn together towards the East, to express their will to participate in the work of worship and of redemption accomplished by Christ,” he continued. “This manner of doing things could opportunely be put into place in cathedrals, where liturgical life must be exemplary.”

Continuing his discussion of “active participation,” Cardinal Sarah criticized the “contemporary Western mentality” in which the faithful are to be “constantly busy” and in which the Mass is to be rendered “convivial.”

On the contrary, “sacred awe” and “joyful fear require our silence in the presence of the divine majesty. It is often forgotten that sacred silence is one of the means set forth by the Council to encourage participation.”

Cardinal Sarah recalled the Council’s teaching that the faithful should “be able to say or to sing together in Latin those parts of the Ordinary of the Mass which pertain to them,” and said that the liturgy “must stop being a place of disobedience to the requirements of the Church.”

The Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy, he emphasized, should not be read with a “hermeneutic of rupture.”

“It would be wrong to consider the extraordinary form of the Roman rite as coming from another theology,” he said. To manifest that the ordinary form and the extraordinary form are “in continuity and without opposition,” it would be “desirable” that there be an appendix in an upcoming edition of the Roman Missal that would permit celebrants in the ordinary form to use the penitential rite and the offertory of the extraordinary form.

“If we live in this spirit, then the liturgy will cease to be the place of rivalry and criticism,” and instead be the place in which we participate actively in the heavenly liturgy, the cardinal concluded.


http://www.catholic culture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=25239

“It would be wrong to consider the extraordinary form of the Roman rite as coming from another theology,” he said. To manifest that the ordinary form and the extraordinary form are “in continuity and without opposition,” it would be “desirable” that there be an appendix in an upcoming edition of the Roman Missal that would permit celebrants in the ordinary form to use the penitential rite and the offertory of the extraordinary form.

I've read many warnings that the Conciliar sect ultimately plans to combine the two (separate and distinct) rites into one.  Calling the two rites the "ordinary form" and the "extraordinary form" of the same rite doesn't make it so.  Just as "a rose by any other name" is still a rose.

This may be the first step in the long process of combining the rites.  First, make it look like nothing is happening to the traditional rite by fiddling with the Novus Ordo and adding some aspects of tradition as more options for the Novus Ordo.  Eventually, the Conciliar sect will start making certain aspects of the Novus Ordo part of the "1962 Missal" which no one who says Ratzinger's Good Friday prayer for the Jєωs uses anymore.  

In any event, the process will be slow since they learned their lesson that fast changes cause people to see what is happening.  The process will start with the Novus Ordo.  Eventually, there will be one "form" that will have enough options that a priest could still say what appears to be a traditional Mass all the while using the Novus Ordo Sacramentary.

"ordinary" = Novus Ordo Missae  facing the people
"extra ordinary" = pre-conciliar liturgy facing Almigty God (normally in tabernacle)
When addressing an important person in daily life the spokesman for a group faces the person spoken to with the group BEHIND him, not so? It would be insulting and rather strange, when this spokes-person turned his back to the person he wants to give the message to, and says the message to the crowd following him. Just imagine.
It will become a hilarious situation and the important person, if he is still in a courteous mood, might just tip the guy on his shoulder and politely ask him to face him directly repeating what he has to say.
Ad orientem.
God bless. Bill