Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Abp. Lefebvre openly doubts Paul VI's claim to the papacy...  (Read 7550 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Trinity

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3233
  • Reputation: +190/-0
  • Gender: Female
Abp. Lefebvre openly doubts Paul VI's claim to the papacy...
« Reply #30 on: July 18, 2007, 02:38:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That's an interesting thought, Cletus.  I sure never thought of it.  Also the Bible says that Jesus "got no respect" in His homeland.

    But I still say that this is the passion of the Bride, as foretold, and we are acting/have acted much like the apostles.  
    +RIP
    Please pray for the repose of her soul.

    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8166
    • Reputation: +2544/-1122
    • Gender: Male
    Abp. Lefebvre openly doubts Paul VI's claim to the papacy...
    « Reply #31 on: July 18, 2007, 02:56:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Passion of the Bride is over, insofar as she is 'in the tomb' at present.  Yes, we are acting like the Apostles, if that well.  God help us, for we are helpless, sinful brats.
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."


    Offline hollingsworth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2842
    • Reputation: +2932/-517
    • Gender: Male
    Abp. Lefebvre openly doubts Paul VI's claim to the papacy...
    « Reply #32 on: July 18, 2007, 03:00:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    We can say that he was inconsistent and leave it at that. He behaved badly in a crisis. He was just one of millions of tortured Catholic souls, dealing in the wrong way with the soul-crushing circuмstances of Vatican II..... Good, bad, or indifferent, the man simply is not that important in the scheme of things.


    Inconsistent, perhaps.  He did seem to come down hard on some priests whose sentiments he secretly, (and maybe, at times, not so secretly),  shared.  I am reluctant to make any comparisons between the Archbishop and Thomas Cranmer.  But the latter did have a lot of people burned whose Reformation, anti-Catholic views he secretly espoused.  But Cranmer acted cravenly, treacherously, with full knowledge of what he was doing.  At most, Lefebvre, reeling under "soul-crushing circuмstances," in trying to behave responsibly, and in the interests of the Church's future, felt to deal harshly with these priests at the time.
    I do not agree at all that Lefebvre is not an important figure.  Of course he is important!

    Offline Trinity

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3233
    • Reputation: +190/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Abp. Lefebvre openly doubts Paul VI's claim to the papacy...
    « Reply #33 on: July 18, 2007, 03:44:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • In the tomb, huh?  I think you are right about that.  No wonder we are all so gloomy.  Sinful brats, correct.  I was shocked at my own put outed-ness when our water was restricted.  Go figure.  We get a flood and lose our water supply.  I am far more spoiled than I ever thought.
    +RIP
    Please pray for the repose of her soul.

    Offline Cletus

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 603
    • Reputation: +20/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Abp. Lefebvre openly doubts Paul VI's claim to the papacy...
    « Reply #34 on: July 18, 2007, 05:34:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think that we are all behaving amazingly well under the circuмstances. Before Vatican II no one knew what spiritual suffering was. Not in comparison.


    Offline Trinity

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3233
    • Reputation: +190/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Abp. Lefebvre openly doubts Paul VI's claim to the papacy...
    « Reply #35 on: July 18, 2007, 06:25:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I was thinking that before vatican II no one had an idea what this period was going to be like.  And here is everyone trying to decide the right path according to writings of people who never even dreamed of this in their worst nightmares.
    +RIP
    Please pray for the repose of her soul.

    Offline Cletus

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 603
    • Reputation: +20/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Abp. Lefebvre openly doubts Paul VI's claim to the papacy...
    « Reply #36 on: July 18, 2007, 06:54:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Certain broad principles are there, of course: otherwise we wouldn't bother thinking in terms of being faithful Catholics at all. But I agree that there are aspects of the New Pentecost Horror which probably were inconceivable to most Catholics at most periods in Church history.

    One thing I always harp on is the playing of JESUS CHRIST SUPERSTAR on Vatican Radio in the early 70s. Erotic blasphemy against Our Lord Jesus Christ to SOME degree blessed by the Roman Pontiff. I think that as late as 1965 even the liberal Protestant mayor of Podunk would have had the local DJ who played it arrested for disturbing the peace or outraging community standards or SOMETHING.

    But the one thing for which no one ever accounts is the extent to which the Conciliar Church is an affront to God as known to unaided reason, and a corrupter even of such morals as most people respect on the level of the Natural Law alone. We should be so lucky that the Conciliar Church merely suppressed the much more nutritional Traditional Mass and taught a new religion. No small part of Conciliar Church reeducation is brainwashing in favor of certain ungodly lifestyles: most American pagans are still decent on at least that point, and therefore by far the moral superiors of the leaders of the church that blows hot air about their "evangelization."

    The Modernists simply did not get anywhere near the moral depravity of the neo-Modernists. Neither did the Communists as late as 1959, when the Russian leader denounced the Can-Can in terms stronger than those that the Roman Pontiff would have used at that time.

    Offline Trinity

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3233
    • Reputation: +190/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Abp. Lefebvre openly doubts Paul VI's claim to the papacy...
    « Reply #37 on: July 19, 2007, 07:05:40 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I didn't know vatican radio did that.  Never listened to that blasphemous recording myself.

    But what you said about them being corrupters really hit home with me.  I've said that I don't know how corrupted I am, but from time to time I get a glimpse.  I will go along with something or pass over it, and only later realize that isn't right, or that is offensive to God.  I don't have the knee jerk.  It's not offensive to me, so it takes time or thought or something else before I even realize it.  I should be so trained that I have a knee jerk to these things, but quite the opposite is the case.  
    +RIP
    Please pray for the repose of her soul.


    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8166
    • Reputation: +2544/-1122
    • Gender: Male
    Abp. Lefebvre openly doubts Paul VI's claim to the papacy...
    « Reply #38 on: July 20, 2007, 03:22:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • As my friend Patto says...

    'We are all damaged goods.'

    Even the best of us, especially those who have lived their entire lives in the V2 and post-V2 era, do not see things as clearly as our fathers did.
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."

    Offline dust-7

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 199
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Abp. Lefebvre openly doubts Paul VI's claim to the papacy...
    « Reply #39 on: July 21, 2007, 02:47:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: gladius_veritatis

    Even the best of us, especially those who have lived their entire lives in the V2 and post-V2 era, do not see things as clearly as our fathers did.


    Or more clearly. We can look back on the string of private predictions and prophecies speaking of a darkened or apostate church and see what they meant. We can look back on same and see what was meant by a 'disorganized' remnant of Catholics somewhat mistrusting of each other.

    What we don't know is where does the next Pope come from, this great holy Pope who is perhaps brought back to Rome by a secular ruler called the Great Monarch, out of France. Or does it even happen that way? Does this Pope arise from the apostate church? Is he elected by the cardinals? Or does he come from the disorganized and leaderless remnant, who decide to elect a Pope and who decides to go to Rome? The next council? Is this the remnant council, or one of bishops shaking themselves out of apostacy, or a combination - etc?

    My suspicion is that much of this plays out when there are two men claiming the papacy, one legitimately, one falsely. I would certainly suspect that the fraud is the one in Vatican City, and least for a time. Perhaps, because of the armies of this Monarch, Catholics do again get back the Vatican, and Notre Dame, etc. Maybe the Roman Protestant doesn't give it back. Maybe they are shrinking, scared and physically removed to make way for those they had shunned and mocked.

    Offline Cletus

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 603
    • Reputation: +20/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Abp. Lefebvre openly doubts Paul VI's claim to the papacy...
    « Reply #40 on: July 21, 2007, 03:05:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Then, of course, there is the possibility that there will never be another pope, and that the Catholic fat lady has sung. Or chanted.

    We speak of the Church's being in the tomb. When you're dead you're dead. Except if you rise or get raised. But why should we think that the resurrection would be going back to a Pius XII? Or an Honorius?

    We have to be coolly logical about these things, not starry-eyed and Romantic. I think we should get wiser to the Master and lay off the St Casper Buffalo or whoever. Who could ever really trust a Pius XIII? Then we could get a John XXIV. And then a Pius XIV. But then a John XXV. Though then a Pius XV. And so on and so on. That's not a Christian construct. It's pure paganism. Good pope, bad pope, good pope, bad pope. The ongoing cycle. Per omnia saecula saeculorum.

    T'aint fittin'. Just as the account of the Passion in the Slavonic additions of Josephus' history is not fitting. Because it has Jesus getting arrested by Pilate and whipped, and then returning to His ministry for a time. It's not dogma that this could not have been the case. It may not even be Gospel Truth. But we know that it's the truth about Him before God and Man. One touch of the high priest's guard in Gethsemane and He had as good as bowed His head and given up the ghost.

    If Vatican II equals the Passion and we are now in the Entombment, tit-for-tat parallelism would make only the all-glorious Apocalypse the required "resurrection." After His death, Jesus did not return to His normal human life on earth the way Lazarus did. Getting a Pope Pius XIII, so to speak, would only be like getting the nine lepers to express gratitude.


    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Abp. Lefebvre openly doubts Paul VI's claim to the papacy...
    « Reply #41 on: July 21, 2007, 09:25:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Do you believe that their will not be any more true popes, Cletus?


    Andy

    Offline Cletus

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 603
    • Reputation: +20/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Abp. Lefebvre openly doubts Paul VI's claim to the papacy...
    « Reply #42 on: July 21, 2007, 11:22:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I wouldn't want to say that I don't believe that there will be another pope.  

    I would say that I just don't think in terms of there ever being another one. Just as I don't think in terms of having to set places at our next Christmas dinner for all our dead relatives who MIGHT all be raised from the dead by the prophet Elijah. But still, I wouldn't want to say that I don't believe that they will be raised by Elijah, because that seems to imply disbelief in the possibility that they COULD be raised by that estimable prophet of old.

    Offline dust-7

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 199
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Abp. Lefebvre openly doubts Paul VI's claim to the papacy...
    « Reply #43 on: July 22, 2007, 12:48:29 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Cletus

    We have to be coolly logical about these things, not starry-eyed and Romantic.


    I agree. The same prophecies from many visionaries, religious, etc, that spoke of the dark or apostate church, that spoke of the 'disorganized' remnant of Catholics who were mistrusting of each other, also spoke of a new Pope, and this idea of a great secular Monarch. The talk, at any rate, is of two Popes. So, perhaps, Catholics do get together and elect a legitimate Pope, but one who does not sit in the Vatican until the Roman Protestants are chased out by secular force. I don't know. It's such speculation what could have been meant by that. They couldn't imagine an apostate Pope, even if some could imagine the bishops and priests were all bad. We find it difficult to imagine a great Monarch coming out of France. Just think of what we now think of when the words - the French Army - are mentioned. It's all very strange. But it's very strange now, no doubt.

    The problem, at present, is this getting together for a council. Catholic do mistrust each other. There are legitimate complaints against the Feenyites and those with one foot in the apostacy like the SSPX. But in these groups, surely, are many Catholics who could put away the serious doctrinal differences, and all confess the same, even officially changing the public stance and policy of those orders - or otherwise leaving them behind. So, it just seems as if time is required to get together a sufficient group that a council could be called. Prophecies also speak of a great restorative council. I find it difficult to imagine that comes out of the apostate church.

    But, I agree. One ought to proceed carefully, but with some zeal and prayer. It's difficult to know what specifically to make of many of those prophecies with regard to - what comes next? I find it confusing, at any rate.

    Offline Cletus

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 603
    • Reputation: +20/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Abp. Lefebvre openly doubts Paul VI's claim to the papacy...
    « Reply #44 on: July 22, 2007, 01:59:41 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I myself just have no use for those prophecies at all. I have yet to see a prophecy that even touched on the obscene reality of the Vatican II church. Maybe the third secret of Fatima, the one we'll probably never know about for sure, does. I don't see anyone foreseeing the real problem: I don't put any credence in these prophecies as indications of real solutions. Besides, they are just private revelations and every single one may be a lot of hot air, though it would be nice to put things more respectfully if it is a question of a canonized Saint in particular.

    As for Holy Roman Emperors and the French Monarchs... Which inbred playboy would we mounting that snow white steed and charging at the children of the Revolution established in high places?