“From some fissure the smoke of Satan has entered the temple of God.”

“You Can’t be Catholic and an αnтι-ѕємιтє”

Bishop Robert Barron

After receiving backlash for his vehemently pro-Jєωιѕн positions, Bishop Robert Barron wrote this brief article on his obviously erroneous position that put him at odds with the Early Church Fathers, countless Popes and saints, and many ecuмenical councils. This prompted questions into who might’ve been behind Bishop Barron rising from relative obscurity into becoming a minor celebrity, who’s given talks on religion at Amazon, Facebook, and Google, and has established an enormous and lucrative social media presence. While this is a subjective claim, it does not appear that Barron is especially talented. In 2022, Barron’s followers were shocked as a sɛҳuąƖ assault scandal roiled his “Word on Fire” ministry.[3] However, The National Catholic Reporter, a mainstream publication, seemed unwilling to touch on the substantial evidence of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ conduct involving Barron, laid out in this linked article, of which I will post the summary:[4]

“So, to answer the question is Barron an active ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ? Well, we really don’t know and affirming this would make us sin. The fact, based on the evidence presented here, is that Barron does enjoy having younger, muscular, tattooed white men around him always and he pays them unusually high salaries that look like bribes to keep them around. We find this disturbing and very questionable to say the least.”

Regardless of the reason, Barron was transferred from his prominent Los Angeles position into effective exile in Winona-Rochester. Barron’s case is one of many cases of disturbing sɛҳuąƖ misconduct that have been unveiled in both the Church and the state in recent times, both of which have become overwhelmingly friendly towards Jєωιѕн organizations and the state of Israel. After the large sɛҳuąƖ abuse scandal was revealed in the Church around 20 years ago, many asked what it was about the Church that was creating such an issue with pedophilia at high levels, with some blaming clerical celibacy. However, the recent Jeffrey Epstein scandal showed that this problem is not limited to the Church, but has become endemic among the governmental elite as well. Jerry Falwell Jr.’s recent cuckoldry scandal shows that this also extends to prominent Protestants.[5] While some have speculated that simply being in power makes one more likely to become a sɛҳuąƖ deviant or pedophile, there doesn’t seem to be any clear reason as to why this would be the case, and there’s also the fact that many of these scandals started before the individuals involved came to significant power. A more plausible explanation is offered by Ron Unz in his analysis of Epstein and the Pizzagate pedophilia conspiracy.[6] Ultimately, it comes down to blackmail, and Unz gives a variety of historical examples on the role of blackmail in politics. A blackmailer knowing that someone is a pedophile, and being able to hold this over their head, gives them total control over the person’s career, maybe even their entire life. If the blackmailer also has significant wealth or media/political influence, they can use that influence to push the pedophile into a position of power, and then they would effectively have total, guaranteed control over that position of power.

Jeffrey Epstein

Jeffrey Epstein’s job was simple, he would hang around with the wealthy and powerful, and then he would attempt to rope them into a compromising situation with an underage girl. Accuмulating this blackmail wasn’t just for the sake of enriching himself, however. Alexander Acosta, Epstein’s prosecutor in a 2007 case, described how he cut Epstein a non-prosecution deal because “he had ‘been told’ to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade.” He said, “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone.”[7] So, which intelligence agency did Epstein “belong” to? A clue is found from Epstein’s partner in crime, Ghislaine Maxwell. Ghislaine’s father was Robert Maxwell, a Jєωιѕн media proprietor who was suspected of being a foreign spy. The British government was reluctant to say who he was spying for, but it can be easily deduced from the fact that he received a hero’s funeral in Israel[8], and “Six serving and former heads of Israeli intelligence services attended Maxwell’s funeral in Israel, while Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir eulogized him and stated: “He has done more for Israel than can today be told.”[9] Epstein was not the first time that Israel has collected intelligence in this fashion. Famous Israeli spy, Eli Cohen, used a similar strategy. The New York Times tells how “He befriended top Syrian officials, whom he lured to his apartment with lavish parties where he dispensed free-flowing liquor and prostitutes.”[10] The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, the largest Jєωιѕн activist organization in the United States, had two California offices raided by San Francisco investigators in 1993, and they found that the ADL was keeping files on “more than 10,000 names of individuals and hundreds of political, social and business groups, including some that had worked closely with the ADL.”[11] The Washington Post story also describes how “Evidence of the ADL’s information sharing with the Israeli government is largely historical. In 1961, former ADL national director Benjamin R. Epstein wrote to a B’nai B’rith official that the ADL was following Arab diplomats and activists in America and sharing its information with the governments of Israel and the United States.” Taking all this into account, it seems almost indisputable to say that it’s no accident that our elite is rife with pedophilia and sɛҳuąƖ deviancy, and that these people have been placed there intentionally, by powerful interests who hold this blackmail, of which Jєωιѕн organizations and Israeli intelligence are the top culprits.
This story of Epstein and his background seems damning for our current government, but could something similar have played out in the Catholic Church? It seems that there’s only two ways it could not have. Either because Church officials are far less susceptible to sɛҳuąƖ deviancy, or because Jєωιѕн organizations are less concerned with gaining influence in the Church. Both of these propositions are quite clearly absurd. As is well known, the Church has suffered numerous sɛҳuąƖ scandals recently, including a high-level priest in the USCCB who was caught using the gαy dating app, Grindr, on a regular basis.[12] The idea that Jєωιѕн organizations simply don’t care about the Church is also clearly ridiculous, given the central role that Christianity, especially Catholicism, played in marginalizing the Christ-rejecting Jєωs prior to the 20th century. The h0Ɩ0cαųst Museum website has a webpage dedicated to “Christian persecution”, stretching back to the early Church.[13] It’s well known that the Catholic Church put many restrictions on Jєωιѕн power and influence historically, such as totally barring them from positions of power during the Fourth Lateran Council. This Jєωιѕн anxiety over Christian antisemitism has led the ADL to take significant interest in even obscure issues of the Church, such as the use of the Latin Mass. After restrictions on the Latin Mass were lifted by Pope Benedict XVI, the ADL released a lengthy complaint, including references to the Church’s “2,000-year history of anti-Semitism” and the “great suffering and pain imposed on the Jєωs by the church through the centuries,” and finally summarized by stating how “The wider use of the Latin Mass will make it more difficult to implement the doctrines of Vatican II and Pope John Paul II, and could even set in motion retrograde forces within the church on the subject of the Jєωs, none of which are in the interest of either the church or the Jєωιѕн people.”[14] As we will explore below, Jєωιѕн organizations were active in Vatican II, and one of those organizations, B’nai B’rith, has met with every Pope since John XXIII.[15] It isn’t hard to find evidence of tactics used that are evocative of Epstein and Cohen, such as the case of the “Vatican girl”.
The Vatican Girl
On June 22nd, 1983, 15-year-old Vatican resident, Emanuela Orlandi, mysteriously disappeared in Rome while walking home from music school. Threatening messages soon followed from the supposed kidnappers, demanding the release of John Paul II’s would-be assassin. It was widely believed that she was kidnapped as part of an international terrorist plot, a belief John Paul II himself amplified. However, the messages soon stopped, and all investigations into the matter lead to dead ends. It then began to appear that the messages were a misdirection,[16] and as with other high-profile tragedies, a wide array of conspiracy theories followed, most of which were laid out in a recent Netflix docuмentary on the case. As with 9/11 and the Kennedy Assassination, the simplest theory with the most evidence is the one that cannot be mentioned, while wild speculation runs amok. Among the many theories put forward, a suggestion by the John Paul II appointed Chief Exorcist of Rome, Father Gabriele Amorth, would sound far-fetched to the average person, but bears an eerie resemblance to the cases we discussed above. “This was a crime with a sɛҳuąƖ motive. Parties were organized, with a Vatican gendarme acting as the ‘recruiter’ of the girls. The network involved diplomatic personnel from a foreign embassy to the Holy See. I believe Emanuela ended up a victim of this circle.”[17] In an interview, Cardinal Silvio Oddi gave a similar account: “the cardinal said that he had heard that Emanuela had returned by car to the Vatican, crediting the trail of a scandal of a sɛҳuąƖ nature or the trafficking of white women.”[18]

This was further backed up by a statement from a childhood friend of Orlandi’s who claims that Orlandi told her she was molested by a Vatican clergyman shortly before her disappearance.[19] The statements of Amorth and Oddi carry much weight, as they are both high-level priests who were directly connected to the Vatican. The prolific pedophilia of Marcial Maciel and Theodore McCarrick that occured under John Paul II’s papacy also point to this as the most plausible explanation, along with the fact that another 15 year old girl disappeared 40 days prior[20]. This theory was given much credence during the “Vatican Leaks Scandal” of 2012, when Pope Benedict XVI ordered an investigation into a leak of sensitive docuмents, and reportedly discovered a network of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs in the Vatican, that were setting up sex parties and being blackmailed from the outside. This network included high prelates. The Atlantic summarizes the report:
“The Vatican has a Velvet Mafia — and the Velvet Mafia is being blackmailed. The dossier alleges that a gαy lobby exists within the Church, and has some sort of control on the careers of those in the Vatican. The dossier also alleges that this group isn’t as covert as it thinks — and got blackmailed by people on the outside. “[21]
The Vatican did not deny the report, and there was later another leak of private comments from Pope Francis, confirming the report to be true.[22] The Atlantic article also relays how “in 2010, Ghinedu Ehiem, a Nigerian clergyman who was part of one of the Vatican’s prestigious choirs, was dismissed after police wiretaps found him negotiating for male prostitutes.” More intriguing than the sɛҳuąƖ nature of the Orlandi disappearance itself, however, is Amorth’s claim that personnel connected to a foreign embassy were the ones setting up these sɛҳuąƖ parties for members of the Vatican. It does not take much imagination to figure out whose foreign embassy this was. The stridently anti-communist nature of John Paul II’s papacy rules out any countries of the communist bloc, unless their infiltration was woefully failing. Also, this blackmail ring continued long after the USSR collapsed. On the other hand, John Paul’s II’s papacy was remarkably pro-Jєωιѕн, which we will describe in detail later in this article, and this included the legal recognition and establishment of diplomatic relations with Israel in 1993. One might point out that the Orlandi case happened before the Israeli embassy to the Holy See was actually established in 1993. However, embassies to the Holy See are not actually in the Vatican, they are in Rome just like embassies to Italy (Israel’s embassy to the Holy See today is in the same building as its embassy to Italy), so for a secondhand witness like Amorth, it would be quite difficult to differentiate between personnel from an embassy to the Holy See as opposed to personnel from an embassy to Italy. All evidence points to a continuous pattern of behavior from Israeli intelligence, and the capital of Christendom unsurprisingly did not escape their sights.
The Council

Pope John XXIII

The reforms of Vatican II are today such a part of our daily lives as Catholics that we sometimes forget that it was a major surprise when John XXIII called this massive ecuмenical council, just three months into his papacy. It was a surprise not just to laity, but also to the cardinals themselves,[23] who had primarily elected him as a compromise candidate that was not expected to do much of significance, due to his advanced age.[24] John XXIII would later give the impression that his idea for this major ecuмenical council came to him on a whim, shortly after his election.[25] Along with that, The Cambridge History of Christianity reports that the council had a “remarkably short time for preparation, but then John was feeling his age, and was eager to get it under way.” The oddity of calling a surprise ecuмenical council and then seemingly rushing it through, resulting in a host of drastic changes to the Church, left many Catholics feeling like they had witnessed more of a coup d’état than a council. As usual, various theories have been put forward as to what happened here, but the principle of Cui Bono (Who gained?) will assist us here again, and John XXIII did not even make much of an attempt to hide his intense concern for the Jєωιѕн people. NPR provides a useful summary:

Pope Pius XII

“John XXIII, also known as “Good Pope John,” was nearly 77 at his coronation and, because of his advanced age, was widely regarded as a “stopgap” pope who wasn’t going to make waves. Instead, he called the Vatican II Council, which promulgated one of the most far-reaching and controversial reforms in the Roman Catholic Church’s history. Even before the Second Vatican Council, as Vatican II is formally known, he showed a propensity for shaking things up. In one of his first acts as pope, John XXIII moved to dissociate the church from its troubled past relations with Jєωs. His predecessor, Pope Pius XII, had steered a frequently controversial path through World War II — maintaining relations with nαzι Germany while criticizing the war, though historians disagree about the particulars. Events during the war, especially the h0Ɩ0cαųst, led John XXIII to eliminate the description of Jєωs as “perfidious” in the Good Friday liturgy and to confess the church’s history of anti-Semitism.[26]
An article from Inside the Vatican extolling John XXIII’s accomplishments for the Jєωιѕн people provides a more detailed look at just how devoted he was to their cause.[27] The article is lengthy, but I will relay some noteworthy moments:

-“Time Magazine Vatican correspondent Robert Blair Kaiser recounted yet another story of Pope John and his sensitivity to Jєωs. The story was told to Kaiser by Msgr. Loris Capovilla, Pope John’s private secretary. ‘A young Jєωιѕн lad made the acquaintance of Giuseppe Roncalli when he was the Cardinal-Archbishop of Venice. The young man wanted to become a Catholic, but Roncalli kept putting him off. ‘Look,’ he said, ‘you’re a Jєω. Be a good Jєω. Becoming a Catholic will kill your parents.’’’
-“In September 1959, Pope John addressed liturgical points that he viewed as contributing to negative feelings about Jєωs. A Catholic ritual of baptism contained the following formula of abjuration: ‘Abhor Jєωιѕн unbelief (in Christ) and reject the Hebrew error (that the Messiah has not yet come).’ The Pope ordered that those words be purged from the Baptismal prayer.”
-“It may have been the force of habit, or perhaps it was forgetfulness, but in April 1963, the bishop who celebrated the Good Friday liturgy in Rome’s St. Peter’s Basilica recited the old text, ‘pro perfidies Judaeis.’ Pope John quietly halted the service and had the celebrant start from the beginning of the intercessory prayers.”
-“Israel responded with genuine enthusiasm to the elevation of John to the Throne of St. Peter… The coronation ceremony was attended by Israeli Ambassador Eliahu Sasson, who was appointed for the occasion to be ‘Special Delegate of the Government of Israel.’”
-“He also emphasized his good relations with Israeli diplomats, and expressed the hope that relations between the Vatican and Israel would soon be improved.”
-“In a discussion with Maurice Fisher, a member of the Israeli diplomatic corps, Pope John expressed his sentiments clearly. ‘If I were permitted to listen to my heart, I would recognize the State of Israel here and now.’ On March 27, 1963, Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel and Rabbi Marc Tanenbaum, both leaders in the dialogue between Catholics and Jєωs, met with Cardinal Bea in Boston. They were joined by Cardinal Willebrands and Father Schmidt, two close associates in the budding ecuмenical movement. Bea was very cautious and expressed the hope that the meeting with the group would remain confidential lest the ‘bitter enemies of the Jєωs in Rome’ use it against their efforts. Bea stunned his guests by asking a question; what would they think it the Vatican recognized the State of Israel? The surprised Rabbis responded that Jєωs all around the world would be thrilled at such a move. The death of John three months later was to put that hope on hold for another 30 years. Vatican recognition was finally granted in 1993.”

“Jєωs and Christians agree that a pivotal moment in the history of the Church and the Jєωs occurred on June 12, 1960, when Jules Isaac met Pope John XXIII… In the middle of the war, he began research into the origins of anti-Semitism and understood that Hitler’s pogrom was the culmination of a long history of Christians hating Jєωs… In the pages of his master work, Isaacs compared line by line the actual texts of the Gospels with widely established and accepted Catholic and Protestant commentaries. It was his goal to prove that distortions were responsible for laying the foundation of centuries for the hate, vituperation and intolerance that had plagued relations between Catholics and Jєωs through the centuries. More than that, he wanted those interpretative texts to be permanently removed and corrected texts to be used in the process of teaching and understanding the New Testament… He had met with Cardinals Tisserant, Ottaviani and Bea. Isaac carefully prepared a memorandum to be presented to Pope John. He suggested that a commission be established to study the relations between the Church and the Jєωιѕн people.”[28]

“So far as the Jєωs in particular were concerned, John’s thinking was influenced by an interview with Jules Isaac (on June 13 of the same year) at which Isaac submitted a long dossier to him on Jєωιѕн-Christian relations and, among other things, petitioned him to set up a special secretariat to deal with those relations. Partly as a result of this interview, John determined that, if not a secretariat, the Church should find some other concrete institutional means by which Jєωs and Roman Catholics could enter into relations of mutual knowledge and esteem, that the Council should issue a statement on Jєωs and Judaism, and that Jєωιѕн observers should be invited to assist at the Council sessions. By November, however, several modifications had been imposed on these plans by circuмstances. The conservative element in the Vatican—which dominates the Curia—would not hear of a special secretariat for Judaism; they saw it as the thin end of a wedge opening the door to an alien mentality and ultimately to diplomatic recognition of Israel. John therefore decided that the best course would be to assign the responsibility for drawing up a docuмent on Jєωιѕн-Christian relations to Bea’s new secretariat.”[29]

“AJC’s emissary, the great Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, subsequently had an audience with Pope John XXIII, and was frequently summoned by Cardinal Augustin Bea for consultations during the Second Vatican Council. On behalf of AJC, Rabbi Heschel prepared several background memoranda essential to the drafting of the revolutionary new docuмent on Catholic-Jєωιѕн relations.”[30]

“We are conscious today that many, many centuries of blindness have cloaked our eyes so that we can no longer either see the beauty of Thy Chosen People nor Recognize in their faces the features of our privileged brethren. We realize that the Mark of Cain stands upon our foreheads. Across the centuries our brother Abel has lain in the blood which we drew or shed the tears we caused by forgetting Thy Love. Forgive us for the curse we falsely attached to their name as Jєωs. Forgive us for Crucifying Thee a second time in their flesh, for we knew not what we did…”

“That was where Hirschmann came to rely on Roncalli. In a series of exchanges that summer, the War Refugee Board—working alongside the Jєωιѕн Agency, a network of underground agents tied to the Jєωιѕн authorities in Palestine—made arrangements to transfer packets of immigration certificates to Roncalli, who then forwarded them via church networks to Jєωιѕн communities in Hungary.”[34]

“He had been abroad for a very long time, with little inside knowledge of the workings of Rome and the networks of power that would allow him to become a major voice of reform among the princes of the church. It was therefore a stunning surprise when, upon the death of the pope in 1958, his fellow cardinals raised him even higher. He soon took the name John XXIII.”

All of this raises a major question. Was it simply luck for the Jєωs that Roncalli, probably the most pro-Jєωιѕн cardinal, who had worked directly with their intelligence agencies, happened to come out of nowhere and ascend to the seat of Peter? It would certainly invite much wrath and cօռspιʀαcιҽs from conservatives if a cardinal who had worked with the KGB and had a history of sympathizing with communism, rapidly and shockingly became the Pope, and then proceeded to dedicate himself towards ensuring a drastic shift in the Church’s attitude towards communism. Any analogous situation involving the Freemasons or other widely despised groups would have generated a similar response. Conservatives seem to have largely ignored, however, this exact thing happening with the religion whose authorities sentenced Christ to death, and have been defined by their rejection of Christ for two-thousand years. Unsurprisingly, odd irregularities with the 1958 conclave suggest that John XXIII’s election was more than just a convenient coincidence for the Jєωιѕн people.
On the first day of the 1958 election, the New York Times reported that both the crowd and the Vatican radio had been misled twice into believing a Pope had been elected. Twice the smoke had turned white, indicating a Pope had been chosen, but the smoke later turned black, and the Vatican claimed that technical mistakes had been made.[35] Fr. Charles-Roux made the following comment in Inside the Vatican: “There were certain irregularities about the election during that 1958 conclave, as Cardinal Tisserant has himself acknowledged. Some say Agagianian was elected, others Siri, others some other cardinal, and that the camerlengo [=chamberlain] then annulled the election. In any case, I’m quite sure John XXIII chose his name, the name of an antipope [of the 15th century], quite consciously, to show he had been irregularly elected.”[36]
Fr. Charles-Roux’s statement is backed up by an interview of Cardinal Siri from French journalist Louis Hubert Remy.[37] Remy claims that he was driven to seek this interview after reading the following claim from Prince Scotersco, German cousin of Prince Borghese, President of the 1963 Conclave. “During the Conclave, a Cardinal [Tisserant] left the Sistine Chapel, met with the representatives of B’nai B’rith, announced to them the election of Cardinal Siri. They replied by saying that the persecutions against the Church would continue at once. Returning to the Conclave, he made Montini to be elected.” Scotersco is referring to the 1963 conclave, but he claims there was interference in 1958 as well.[38] Scotersco may have very well have mixed up some details, hearing the story second-hand, and in the interview, Cardinal Siri refutes the claim that a cardinal left the 1963 Conclave. Siri does not, however, address the 1958 Conclave or the possibility that interference could’ve happened without a cardinal actually leaving (such as through a phone call), or the possibility that the warnings were given to certain cardinals before the conclave. There’s also the possibility that this could’ve happened without Siri’s knowledge. Siri’s tone changes though when asked if he was elected Pope. He says: “I am bound by the secret. This secret is horrible. I would have books to write about the different conclaves. Very serious things have taken place. But I can say nothing.” Those involved in a conclave are forbidden from revealing anything that happened in them to the public. Siri again hinted at interference in a 1972 statement:

“The segregation of the conclave is yet more necessary; with modern means, with modern technology, without an absolute segregation it would not be possible to save an election from the pressure of external powers. Today the superpowers (and the lesser ones alike) have too great an interest in having on their side, through condescendence or weakness, the highest moral authority in the world. And they would do all that they are so very good at doing. The pressures to overturn the substance of the law of the conclave could be driven by the will to obtain precisely this result.”[39]

“After 1967, the previous moment of profound political abandonment, the American Jєωιѕн community began to entertain thoughts of its own radical reinvention. A coterie of disillusioned intellectuals, clustered around a handful of small-circulation journals and think tanks, turned sharply rightward, creating the neoconservative movement. Among activists, the energy that had once been directed toward Freedom Rides was plowed into the cause of Soviet Jєωry, which became a defining political obsession of many ѕуηαgσgυєs in the 1970s and ’80s.”[45]

“The night Ronald Reagan was elected President of the United States, I watched the returns in the company of a group of intellectuals who were so jubilant at the news of the mounting landslide that a passing stranger might have taken them for professional Republican Party workers or perhaps for fervent ideological conservatives.
In fact, however, most of them were registered Democrats…Why then, less than four years later, were so many of them cheering for Ronald Reagan?… The label that has come to be attached to the people I am talking about – and I myself am definitely one of them – is “neoconservative”… The second point on which there is little disagreement is that the influence of the neo-conservatives contributed to the election of Ronald Reagan.”[47]

Pope John Paul II

As with all Neo-conservatives, Reagan and Thatcher were generally socially conservative, although far from traditional or retrograde, and they made little effort to roll back any of the social revolutions of the 1960’s. They were far more devoted to confronting the Soviet Union, and they were also pro-Israel. In what would superficially appear to be yet another remarkable stroke of fortune for the Jєωιѕн People, the Catholic Church selected a very similar leader in the 1978 election, Pope John Paul II. His election came after his predecessor suddenly died, after just one month in power. Perhaps even more oddly convenient is the fact that John Paul II was from Poland, the first non-Italian Pope in 455 years. Much has been written about how John Paul II and his support for the Polish “Solidarity” movement helped usher in the end of communist rule in the heavily Catholic Poland, and the eventual collapse of the USSR. Given John Paul II’s Polish heritage and stridently anti-communist views, it would be hard to imagine a candidate better suited to destabilizing the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet government. Jєωιѕн Neo-conservative, Charles Krauthammer, in an article for the Washington Post, describes the miraculous nature of John Paul II’s election for Neo-conservatism:

“I am not much of a believer, but I find it hard not to suspect some providential hand at play when the white smoke went up at the Vatican 27 years ago and the Polish cardinal was chosen to lead the Catholic Church. Precisely at the moment that the West most desperately needed it, we were sent a champion…
And yet precisely at the time of this free-world retreat and disarray, a miracle happens. The Catholic Church, breaking nearly 500 years of tradition, puts itself in the hands of an obscure non-Italian — a Pole who, deeply understanding the East European predicament, rose to become, along with Roosevelt, Churchill and Reagan, one of the great liberators of the 20th century…
It is no accident that Solidarity, the leading edge of the East European revolution, was born just a year after the pope’s first visit. Deploying a brilliantly subtle diplomacy that never openly challenged the Soviet system but nurtured and justified every oppositional trend, often within the bosom of the local church, John Paul II became the pivotal figure of the people power revolutions of Eastern Europe.”[48]

Add in the strangely sudden death of the first John Paul, and you have a very convenient set of circuмstances for the state of Israel and the Jєωιѕн Neo-conservatives that came to dominate US foreign policy, one that is reminiscent of the very convenient events that occurred for the Jєωιѕн people in the 1960’s when John XXIII was elected.

Pope Benedict XVI

Similar to Reagan, John Paul II’s papacy was heavy on geopolitical accomplishments and light on accomplishments for his conservative supporters. Despite being in power for 27 years, no allowance was made for widespread usage of the Latin Mass, even though Pope Benedict XVI did this just two years into his papacy. The Latin Mass remained largely quarantined within a variety of small groups, such as the eventually excommunicated SSPX. To figure out why this may have been, it is useful to return to a quote from the ADL that I mentioned earlier, following Benedict XVI lifting restrictions on the Latin Mass: “The wider use of the Latin Mass will make it more difficult to implement the doctrines of Vatican II and Pope John Paul II, and could even set in motion retrograde forces within the church on the subject of the Jєωs, none of which are in the interest of either the church or the Jєωιѕн people.”[49] John Paul II was also quite friendly towards the “Charismatic Movement,”[50]

which has been widely blamed for bringing Protestant influences and general irreverence to the Mass. On the more positive side, John Paul II did uphold Church teaching on issues such as abortion, contraception, and the ordination of women. However, this is hardly all that commendable given that the liberal Pope Francis also opposes abortion and contraception, and has rejected the possibility of ordaining women.[51]
Along with helping to bring down a major enemy of Israel, John Paul II’s accomplishments are far more substantiative when it comes to what Israel and the Jєωιѕн people got out of his papacy. As with John XXIII, the list is lengthy:

• First Pope to officially visit a ѕуηαgσgυє.[52]
• First Pope to visit the “Wailing Wall” in Israel, where Jєωs go to bemoan the destruction of the Second Temple. He included a prayer that contained an apology for persecution of the Jєωs.[53]
• First Pope to visit Auschwitz, and did so in the first year of his papacy.[54]
• Formally recognized Israel diplomatically.[55] The United States had to pay other nations billions of dollars to entice them to do this. It does not appear that the Vatican received anything in return.
• Forced a group of Carmelite nuns to remove their convent from Auschwitz,[56] even after a Rabbi broke into the convent and screamed “nαzι antisemites” at them,[57] in what some described as an attempted physical assault.
• Canonized alleged h0Ɩ0cαųst victim, Edith Stein, with only one reported miracle instead of the usual three. The one miracle was attested to by a Jєωιѕн doctor.
• There is disagreement over whether John Paul II opposed the historical Christian belief, clearly stated in the Bible (Hebrews 8:13), that Christianity has superseded and delegitimized Judaism as a religion. However, his comments were enough to enable the ADL to state that he had.[58]

“When the position of archbishop of Washington D.C., opened up, the then-archbishop of New York, Cardinal John O’Connor, warned the Vatican in an Oct. 28, 1999 letter that naming McCarrick there would be a mistake, the findings said.
By that time, the allegations against McCarrick included: a 1994 letter by one priest to the Metuchen, N.J., bishop providing eyewitness testimony of McCarrick and other seminarians engaging in sɛҳuąƖ acts during a fishing trip, and the priest’s own claims that McCarrick tried to fondle him. It also included anonymous letters sent to various U.S. cardinals that “accused McCarrick of pedophilia with seminarians as well as claims that McCarrick slept with young men in his official residence as well as seminarians at his beach house. O’Connor cited that information and said the risk of scandal would be too great if McCarrick were moved to Washington.
John Paul tasked the Vatican ambassador to the U.S. to investigate. His report confirmed McCarrick bedded seminarians but didn’t find “certainty” that he had engaged in sɛҳuąƖ misconduct. The findings didn’t explain what McCarrick and the seminarians were doing in bed together. Instead, they faulted the bishops who were asked to provide information to the ambassador, saying “three of the four bishops provided inaccurate and incomplete information.”
The doubts, however, were enough to persuade John Paul to drop McCarrick as a candidate. That would have sealed his fate, but McCarrick made a last-ditch appeal that appears to have changed John Paul’s mind. The U.S. prelate sent a handwritten note via John Paul’s private secretary, then-Archbishop Stanislaw Dziwisz, on Aug. 6, 2000, swearing he “never had sɛҳuąƖ relations with any person male or female, young or old, cleric or lay.”
It struck a chord with the Polish pope, who had first-hand experience of priests being unfairly discredited by false accusations under communist rule, and he named McCarrick to the post.”[61]

“In a 1971 letter to a priest convicted of oral rape of girls, Wojtyla describes the abuse as a ‘crime’ yet reinstates him to parish work – where he abuses again. In another case Wojtyla wrote a personal letter of recommendation for an abusing priest – a personal friend – for a new post in Austria, making no mention of his criminal record.”[68]

Pope John Paul I

This docuмentary has provoked fierce debate, and we should be wary of trusting media investigations, but “where there’s smoke, there’s fire.” The docuмentary fits into a long pattern of abusers facing no consequences under John Paul II. To have a Pope willing to look the other way with sɛҳuąƖ abusers, is an invaluable asset for outside groups who have ensnared those abusers with blackmail. It is noteworthy that the first John Paul demoted Cardinal Baggio, who was instrumental in the rise of McCarrick.[69] John Paul I ostensibly died of a heart attack, but no autopsy was ever undertaken and the Vatican gave conflicting accounts as to how his body was discovered.[70] The Catholic Herald reports how “the fact the then Pontiff was found smiling, sitting up in bed and holding reading material has fueled conspiracy theories, given how unlikely it would be that someone who had suffered a fatal heart attack would look like that.”[71]
John Paul II’s election provided the United States government and the state of Israel with something worth far more than the billions of dollars spent on tanks and bombs every year. By fueling tensions between Polish Catholics and the Soviet government, John Paul II helped bring down the USSR without a single shot fired. The sudden death of John Paul I and the high-level pedophiles that inundated the John Paul II papacy suggest that, like with Vatican II, someone was driving these events more directly than was apparent. The one group that benefited immensely from both Vatican II and John Paul II’s papacy is, of course, the Jєωιѕн people. While playing soccer as a child in Poland, John Paul II was “always ready to play on the Jєωιѕн team.”[72] This casual comment may have contained a remarkable prescience.
The Spark of Counter-Revolution
“How much filth there is in the church, especially among those who, in the priesthood, are supposed to belong totally to him (Christ).”[73]
Having been stymied in his attempts to investigate Groer and Maciel, the newly elected Pope Benedict XVI was likely aware of a significant problem with ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs and pedophiles at high levels of the Church, when he referred to this filth in the priesthood, but he was likely unaware of exactly the extent of the hornets’ nest he was about to step on. Frequently portrayed as an uncharismatic, dour rigorist in the media, Benedict XVI did not even want to be Pope, and he prayed to God “Please don’t do this to me,” upon realizing he was about to be elected. Despite his advanced age and reticence regarding his new position, Benedict XVI soon launched an array of direct challenges against what had become a Jєωιѕн stranglehold on the Church, whether he was aware of this situation or not. Following his resignation, the ADL issued the following resentful admonishment:

“There were bumps in the road during this papacy – the rewriting of the old Good Friday prayer for Jєωs making it more problematic for Jєωs, starting negotiations with the anti-Semitic group the Society of St. Pius X, and moving World War II Pope Pius XII one step closer to sainthood while the Secret Vatican Archives are still under wraps.”[74]

“The main reason to be disturbed by the return of this Vatican-sanctioned prayer is that it threatens to undermine the conceptual underpinnings of so much that has happened over 40 years – Pope John Paul II’s eloquently expressed statement that Judaism is “the elder brother” of Christianity; that it has a legitimacy and validity of its own; that it has an unbroken covenant with God. It is this conceptual breakthrough – one that has provided the framework for all the specific, positive steps to emerge – that is now being challenged.”[75]

“Under Ratzinger’s watch as cardinal and pope, the Vatican authorized fast-track administrative procedures to defrock egregious abusers. Changes to church law allowed the statute of limitations on sex abuse to be waived on a case-by-case basis; raised the age of consent to 18; and expanded the norms protecting minors to also cover “vulnerable adults.” The changes had an immediate impact: Between 2004 and 2014 — Benedict’s eight-year papacy plus a year on either end — the Vatican received about 3400 cases, defrocked 848 priests and sanctioned another 2572 to lesser penalties, according to the only Vatican statistics ever publicly released. Nearly half of the defrockings occurred during the final two years of Benedict’s papacy.”[82]

“In 2012, Pope Benedict XVI ordered an investigation into a leak of sensitive docuмents, and reportedly discovered a network of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs in the Vatican, that were setting up sex parties and being blackmailed from the outside. This network included high prelates. The Atlantic summarizes the report:
“The Vatican has a Velvet Mafia — and the Velvet Mafia is being blackmailed. The dossier alleges that a gαy lobby exists within the Church, and has some sort of control on the careers of those in the Vatican. The dossier also alleges that this group isn’t as covert as it thinks — and got blackmailed by people on the outside. ”
The Vatican did not deny the report, and there was later another leak of private comments from Pope Francis, confirming the report to be true. The Atlantic article also relays how “in 2010, Ghinedu Ehiem, a Nigerian clergyman who was part of one of the Vatican’s prestigious choirs, was dismissed after police wiretaps found him negotiating for male prostitutes.””

“As millions of Roman Catholics rejoice in the news that two popes are being fast-tracked to sainthood, many Jєωs are smiling with them. Pope Francis has approved John XXIII and John Paul II for the church’s supreme honor in a process that quick-stepped protocol. Jєωs, on the other hand, will remember both of these men for taking steps that were a millennium in the making.
Over the centuries, Catholic Church-inspired anti-Semitism spawned the demonizing and murder of countless Jєωs. Across Europe and wherever the church’s teachings reached, the faithful were taught that Jєωs had no place among decent human beings, that the Jєωιѕн people’s covenant with the Almighty was rendered null and void by Christianity, and that Jєωs were cursed to eternal tribulation for having crucified Jesus. Because Europeans had been taught these tropes for generations, Adolph Hitler (no religious devotee himself) and the nαzιs could be confident of the support they would receive across the continent when they unleashed their Final Solution of the “Jєωιѕн question” — the genocide of a people…
During John Paul II’s final illness, the leaders of the Simon Wiesenthal Center requested an audience with him. The Vatican responded that they had already met with the pope on an earlier occasion. “Yes,” Rabbi Marvin Hier responded, “but this time we only want to say thank you.”[85]
Many thank you’s indeed should come from these Jєωιѕн organizations. A thank you to their intelligence apparatus, which ensnared corrupt and depraved Church officials into its web. Another thank you to that apparatus, which appears to have used those officials to install John XXIII, to call and then manipulate Vatican II, to dispose of John Paul I and install John Paul II, and finally to force the resignation of Benedict. It would be unwise of them to issue too many thank you’s, however. When the Jєωιѕн authorities in the Sanhedrin condemned Christ to death, they too basked in power and confidence. Yet when they died, it was amidst the rubble of their Temple and the shattered pieces of their covenant. No matter how much the gates of hell are buttressed, they will always break before Jesus Christ and His Church.
Notes
[1] https://www.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/it/homilies/1972/docuмents/hf_p-vi_hom_19720629.html
[2] https://www.newadvent.org/summa/3033.htm#article5
[3] https://www.ncronline.org/news/accountability/multiple-resignations-bishop-barrons-word-fire-after-allegations-staffers
[4] https://cleanthechurch.com/bishop-robert-barrons-disturbing-musclemen-fetish-is-a-scandal-by-itself/
[5] https://www.theroot.com/we-ve-got-to-talk-about-this-jerry-falwell-jr-cuckold-1844843452
[6] https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-john-mccain-jeffrey-epstein-and-pizzagate/
[7] https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epsteins-sick-story-played-out-for-years-in-plain-sight
[8] https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1991/11/11/israel-gives-maxwell-farewell-fit-for-hero/1773995a-0eac-4a3e-abed-1d3254cc0baa/
[9] Thomas, Gordon (1999). Gideon’s Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad. New York City: St. Martin’s Press. p. 23. ISBN 978-0312252847.
[10] https://www.nytimes.com./2018/07/05/world/middleeast/israel-cohen-watch-spy.html
[11] https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1993/10/19/Jєωιѕн-groups-tactics-investigated/96daef6a-a325-4a8a-ba09-da211fc1ba8a/
[12] https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/08/catholic-priest-jeffrey-burrill-grindr-pillar/619758/
[13] https://www.ushmm.org/research/about-the-mandel-center/initiatives/ethics-religion-h0Ɩ0cαųst/articles-and-resources/christian-persecution-of-Jєωs-over-the-centuries/christian-persecution-of-Jєωs-over-the-centuries
[14] https://web.archive.org/web/20070715141249/http://www.adl.org/ADL_Opinions/Interfaith/JTA_071107.htm
[15] https://www.bnaibrith.org/about-us/history-of-service/
[16] https://archive.ph/jLHbg
[17] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/vaticancityandholysee/9283407/Emanuela-Orlandi-was-kidnapped-for-sex-parties-for-Vatican-police.html
[18] https://www.lastampa.it/vatican-insider/it/2017/09/27/news/caso-orlandi-quella-ricerca-di-padre-lombardi-1.34427020/
https://archive.ph/i71a2#selection-1251.0-1264.0
[19] https://www.newsweek.com/what-happened-emanuela-orlandi-vatican-girl-theories-netflix-1753925
[20] https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/255973/italian-senate-launches-inquiry-into-disappearance-of-vatican-girl-and-another-missing-teen
[21] https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/02/secret-vatican-report/318079/
[22] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/12/reports-pope-gαy-prelate-network
[23] https://international.la-croix.com/news/letter-from-rome/surprise-announcement-of-an-elderly-pope-continues-to-reverberate-today/9312
[24] https://www.investors.com/news/management/leaders-and-success/pope-john-xxiii-instituted-reforms/
[25] https://books.google.com/books?id=Ms_SyCLNpuAC&pg=PA308#v=onepage&q&f=false
[26] https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/04/25/306842737/saint-who-john-xxiii-overshadowed-by-john-paul-ii
[27] https://insidethevatican.com/magazine/vatican-watch/incomparable-pope-john-xxiii-Jєωs-long/
[28] https://insidethevatican.com/magazine/vatican-watch/incomparable-pope-john-xxiii-Jєωs-long/
[29] https://www.commentary.org/articles/fe-cartus/vatican-ii-the-Jєωs/
[30] https://www.ajc.org/history-of-ajc-and-the-vatican
[31] https://insidethevatican.com/magazine/vatican-watch/incomparable-pope-john-xxiii-Jєωs-long/
[32] https://www.businessinsider.com/jesuits-with-history-of-sɛҳuąƖ-misconduct-sent-to-live-at-gonzaga-2018-12
[33] https://content.Jєωιѕнagency.org/bp/#/folder/6118727/92776998
[34] https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2014/09/how-ira-hirschmann-and-the-future-pope-john-xxiii-ushered-Jєωιѕн-refugees-through-turkey-to-palestine-during-world-war-ii.html
[35] https://www.nytimes.com/1958/10/27/archives/cardinals-ballot-4-times-but-fail-to-elect-a-pope-voting-to.html
[36] https://insidethevatican.com/product/september-2004/ Pg. 41
[37]
[38] Excerpt from the French Newsletter, Introibo, No. 61, July-August-September, 1988, Association Noel Pinot, Angers, France, p. 3.
[39] https://novusordowatch.org/wp-content/uploads/siri_election.pdf
[40] https://books.google.com/books?id=W3CbCiHj-ZEC&pg=PA608#v=onepage&q&f=false
[41] https://books.google.com/books?id=Gx2Niv1VU4AC&pg=PA92#v=onepage&q&f=false
[42] https://www.academia.edu/79049262/Jєωs_in_the_Communist_movement_in_the_Second_Polish_Republic_1918_1938_an_outline_of_the_issue
[43] https://www.bnaibrith.org/about-us/history-of-service/
[44] https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA009933.pdf

However, just because Vatican II did not produce the effect hoped for by Paul VI, doesn’t mean it did not produce the change that someone else intended.

...I don't believe for a second that Montini...and a couple of others were somehow well-intentioned...Montini did not hope for some good effects.  He was a conspirator...

While it's a great expose otherwise, I don't believe for a second that Montini, Ratzinger, and a couple of others were somehow well-intentioned.
Montini did not hope for some good effects.  He was a conspirator.  And Ratizinger's freeing up of the Tridentine Mass was (as admitted later by Ganswein) and attempt to neutralize and reabsorb the SSPX.  All the V2 papal claimants were in on it.