It's amazing how the feminists immediately revealed themselves with their vileness.
The OP posts clearly states the
principal of corporal punishment. Which the Saint also refers to
Summa, Supplement, Q. 62, Article 2, Reply to Objection 1:
The wife can be corrected for her sin of fornication not only by this punishment [putting her away] but also by words and blows; wherefore if she be ready to be corrected otherwise, her husband is not bound to have recourse to the aforesaid punishment in order to correct her.
He mentions "blows" which would be considered corporal punishment. But if you read the next lines you can see that if the women is good to receive non-physical correction the husband does not need to use blows.
The fact is there are times when a woman does need to be physically punished. There are plenty of psychotic women who won't learn without a smack or two, and it would not be sin to do so. However because of modern society's anti-Christ laws most men will not do so.
It's quite sad to see self-proclaimed Catholics get upset over the principal of corporal punishment that they would attack someone's character. Even to to point of making stuff like implying corporal punishment means severely bashing someone...
You all should really consider how much feminist instead you have.
And no Gray, calling volleyball "innocent" does not make it so. Also 'fun' is a modern thing. My priest does not like 'fun'. Enjoyment in things is fine but 'fun' is fundamentally different, and the idea that a person needs to have 'fun' is destructive.
Topic: A feminist is... (Read 56141 times)