Quo Vadis, you still have not answered the original question, nor does Mr Daly. HOW is it determined whether a person/pope is pernicious or not?
.
...Your personal answer is: You do realize that the pope, or rather one who claims to be pope, is presumed to know exactly what the Church’s doctrine entails, thus pertinacity is easier to establish than say one who is just a layman?
.
1) Are you saying that because a pope is presumed to know doctrine completely, that any doctrinal error he makes is automatically pernicious?
2) So a pope is either 100% doctrinally correct, or a pernicious heretic, with no middle ground?
3) If so, why is he presumed to know doctrine completely? Is he infused with perfect knowledge at the moment of coronation?
.
This is my 2nd formal, public request for this question to be answered. Per St Paul's 2-rebuke process, if you do not answer then I will assume you are pernicious and 1) you don't have an answer and 2) you are officially dodging the question.
.
:heretic: Please answer so we don't have to burn you at the pernicious stake!