Here is Louie V's take:

https://akacatholic.com/ecclesial-theater/

While "the worthy Shpherd" has not yet explicitly emerged, one might perhaps look back at the election of Bergoglio as having exposed this shism.

Absolutely!  Jorge exposed the schism in the most glorious manner.  I only pray that the next fake pope isn’t slightly less odious.  The cult of personality is such an unbelievable draw.  A handsome man promulgating the same heresies as Jorge with a little more sophistication will be declared a saint.  I mean Wotjyla, whew, that guy was a raging heretic, he worshipped man instead of God and told everybody about it everywhere all the time and promulgated his new humanism to the ends of the earth and conservatives still venerate him as a saint and traditionalists still believe he was a pope. I’ll tell you what though, Catholics who have had their eyes opened by Jorge are looking at a different situation than you traditionalists who were attending Chapels for Latin Mass your whole lives.  These Masses have operated on an emergency basis, Epikeia…but me, I’m coming to this after many years and I’m not looking to live the rest of my life on an emergency basis and I’m certainly not looking to send my children off to get married and raise families on an emergency footing.  If the world ends, it does but we need to repair this situation.  One doesn’t go on indefinitely eating MRE’s forever; you figure out a way to establish a reliable food supply.  The Church needs a Pope.

How many years has it been now since "Cardinal" Burke and Friends sent their filial correction?

Forgive my inability to trust the NO "bishops".  This will go nowhere just as the above went nowhere.

How many years has it been now since "Cardinal" Burke and Friends sent their filial correction?

Forgive my inability to trust the NO "bishops".  This will go nowhere just as the above went nowhere.

Sure, this will likely go nowhere, although Bishop Gracida has declared Bergoglio a heretic non-pope.  Nevertheless, it's encouraging to me to see at least four NO bishops accusing Bergoglio of heresy.  Of course, that's a commentary on the state of the Conciliar Church that ONLY 4 of them call it out.

It is interesting to see a Bishop, thus far in good standing with the NO, declare Bergoglio to be a non-pope.  They probably haven't excommunnicated him over it because they'd prefer to just let the old man (nearly 100) just pass away rather than draw more attention to his claims. 

On a separate note, this man looks amazing for his age, and has amazing grasp of his faculties.  In this interview (the most recent I could find), he's about 93 years old.



He could easily be mistaken for a man, both in his looks and in his intellectual lucidity, for someone in his mid- to late- 60s.

Sure, this will likely go nowhere, although Bishop Gracida has declared Bergoglio a heretic non-pope.  Nevertheless, it's encouraging to me to see at least four NO bishops accusing Bergoglio of heresy.  Of course, that's a commentary on the state of the Conciliar Church that ONLY 4 of them call it out.

It is interesting to see a Bishop, thus far in good standing with the NO, declare Bergoglio to be a non-pope.  They probably haven't excommunnicated him over it because they'd prefer to just let the old man (nearly 100) just pass away rather than draw more attention to his claims. 

On a separate note, this man looks amazing for his age, and has amazing grasp of his faculties.  In this interview (the most recent I could find), he's about 93 years old.



He could easily be mistaken for a man, both in his looks and in his intellectual lucidity, for someone in his mid- to late- 60s.

My dear mother will be 92 in November, and she would compare very favorably with him.  Sharper than many people a third her age, and doesn't look a day over 75.  Doesn't miss a beat.

Marshall, Barnhardt, Vigano  and other "trad" podcasters are setting the stage for Bennyvacantism and the fake Third Secret "Bishop in White" (Benny the fake trad) to save the day!

"Poor Benny is held hostage!" 

No need to spend a lot of time going back into all of the Ratzinger stuff.

St John made it very clear and very simple:

"This is Antichrist, who denieth the Father and the Son. 23Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father. He that confesseth the Son hath the Father also."  1John2:21

Of course there will be many antichrists and we can waste a lot of time looking for the big one with all the various signs like what haircolor they have and what country they were born in etc. etc.

But really, this just narrows it down.  Deny Christ as son of God and the necessity of His salvific cross and...

we're done. 

That's all we need to know. 

Next...


Benedict XVI denied Christ---not just a long time ago and now he is "traditional".  He denied Christ while acting as pope.

It wasn't in an off the cuff statement on an airplane or a misquoted article by a reporter in a newspaper.

It's in his own book he wrote while the acting pope:


BENEDICT XVI PROMOTES THAT JєωS SHOULD NOT BE CONVERTED

Benedict XVI, Jesus of Nazareth – Holy Week: From the Entrance into Jerusalem to the Resurrection, 2011, p. 45: “Hildegard Brem comments on this passage as follows: ‘In the light of Romans 11:25, the Church must not concern herself with the conversion of the Jєωs, since she must wait for the time fixed for this by God, ‘until the full number of the Gentiles come in’ (Rom 11:25).”

Benedict XVI quotes approvingly from Hildegard Brem, who teaches that the Church should not convert Jєωs. Benedict XVI doesn’t contradict the teaching, but promotes it and agrees with it. This is complete and total apostasy. On the next page, he even expands upon the point. He declares that the Jєωs retain their own “mission.”

Benedict XVI, Jesus of Nazareth – Holy Week: From the Entrance into Jerusalem to the Resurrection, 2011, p. 46: “Moreover, we have seen that the nucleus of Jesus’ eschatological message includes the proclamation of an age of the nations, during which the Gospel must be brought to the whole world and to all people: only then can history attain its goal.

In the meantime, Israel retains its own mission. Israel is in the hands of God, who will save it ‘as a whole’ at the proper time, when the number of Gentiles is complete. The fact that that historical duration of this period cannot be calculated is self-evident and should not surprise us.”

According to him, the Jєωs don’t need to be converted because they retain their own mission and are “in the hands of God.” Of course, this is a denial of Jesus Christ, the Gospel, the Catholic faith, and many dogmas. That’s also why we saw him encourage the Chief Rabbi of Rome in his “mission.”

Benedict XVI, Address to Chief Rabbi of Rome, Jan. 16, 2006: “Distinguished Chief Rabbi, you were recently entrusted with the spiritual guidance of Rome’s Jєωιѕн Community; you have taken on this responsibility enriched by your experience as a scholar and a doctor who has shared in the joys and sufferings of a great many people. I offer you my heartfelt good wishes for your mission, and I assure you of my own and my collaborators’ cordial esteem and friendship.”
It’s an epic fraud that this man is able to pass himself off as the pope and the head of the Christian Church. The Apostles were converted Jєωs. The Apostles themselves evangelized the Jєωs. Jesus’ Great Commission (Mk. 16; Mt. 28) instructed the Apostles to bring the Gospel to everyone. It’s a dogma that the Jєωs (just like other non-Christians) cannot be saved without baptism and faith in Christ.

Acts 4:12-“… the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ… Nor is there salvation in any other. For there is no other name, under heaven, given to men, whereby we must be saved.”

Acts 13:45-46- “And the Jєωs seeing the multitudes, were filled with envy, and contradicted those things which were said by Paul, blaspheming. Then Paul and Barnabas said boldly: To you it behooved us first to speak the word of God: but because you reject it, and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold we turn to the Gentiles.”
https://schismatic-home-aloner.com/jesus-of-nazareth-holy-week-anti-pope-benedict-xvi/


God bless Benedict, Francis, Marshall, Barnhardt, Vigano

and all those they lead astray.

No need to spend a lot of time going back into all of the Ratzinger stuff.
....

God bless Benedict, Francis, Marshall, Barnhardt, Vigano

and all those they lead astray.

... and yet you wasted an entire wall of text on it preaching to the choir.  I think there are maybe one or two Bennyvacantists here on this forum, and I haven't heard from any of them in a very long time, since they haven't found the forum members here receptive to the notion.

Secondly, as mentioned earlier, Vigano and Marshall are not Bennyvacantists.  Neither are Benny nor Francis.  So, are you writing all this nonsense to Barnhardt?  Since I doubt she reads this forum, I wrote her an e-mail explaining that Benny is nearly as bad as Bergoglio, but I got no response.