Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: 2 Sister Lucys now proven  (Read 4154 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RomanCatholic1953

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10512
  • Reputation: +3267/-207
  • Gender: Male
  • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
2 Sister Lucys now proven
« on: October 16, 2013, 12:12:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Go to the Tradition in Action Website.  The two Sister Lucys theory is
    now proven through age progression computer technics.


    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10512
    • Reputation: +3267/-207
    • Gender: Male
    • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
    2 Sister Lucys now proven
    « Reply #1 on: October 16, 2013, 12:29:09 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  • Offline ThomisticPhilosopher

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 461
    • Reputation: +210/-4
    • Gender: Male
    2 Sister Lucys now proven
    « Reply #2 on: October 16, 2013, 07:15:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: RomanCatholic1953
    See for yourself:

    http://www.servi.org/Sister_Lucy_Experiment


    Ahaha can I give you a picture of myself to see how accurate that thing is  :rolleyes:. Interesting...  :popcorn:
    https://keybase.io/saintaquinas , has all my other verified accounts including PGP key plus BTC address for bitcoin tip jar. A.M.D.G.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41908
    • Reputation: +23946/-4345
    • Gender: Male
    2 Sister Lucys now proven
    « Reply #3 on: October 16, 2013, 01:43:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't find this convincing; there must be better "aging" technology.  In aging Sister Lucy, it looks like the same picture with the exception of a few extra wrinkles on her face.

    With that said, I do believe that there were (at least) 2 different Sister Lucias.

    At the very least, as a control, they should have run the Sister Lucy #2 through the program and then compared that with the actual real older Sister Lucy #2 that we have.

    Offline TheKnightVigilant

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 606
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    2 Sister Lucys now proven
    « Reply #4 on: October 16, 2013, 02:12:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This experiment was unneccesary because it was already clear that there were 2 sister Lucy's from even the most basic visual analysis. It is impossible that these two women are one and the same because their respective facial structures are totally different in such a way that not even aging or surgery can account for the difference.


    Offline Pelele

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 185
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    2 Sister Lucys now proven
    « Reply #5 on: October 16, 2013, 06:23:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "Now" proven?

    This has been proven ever since that impostor went public and pics came out.

    And this has colossal consequences.

    The Vatican involved in a deliberate conspiracy, getting rid of the REAL Sister Lucy and setting up and IMPOSTOR! Do people realize the significance of this whole thing???

    This alone proves sedevacantism, because the 3rd secret dealt with the Apostasy going on and with "Vatican 2".

    Who knows what they did with the real Sister Lucy!

    Offline Charlemagne

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1439
    • Reputation: +2103/-18
    • Gender: Male
    2 Sister Lucys now proven
    « Reply #6 on: October 16, 2013, 06:27:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: TheKnightVigilant
    This experiment was unneccesary because it was already clear that there were 2 sister Lucy's from even the most basic visual analysis. It is impossible that these two women are one and the same because their respective facial structures are totally different in such a way that not even aging or surgery can account for the difference.


    Are you suggesting that the Conciliar Church perpetrated a fraud? Nahhhhh...
    "This principle is most certain: The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope. The reason for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a member. Now, he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and others. Therefore, the manifest heretic cannot be Pope." -- St. Robert Bellarmine

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4577/-579
    • Gender: Female
    2 Sister Lucys now proven
    « Reply #7 on: October 16, 2013, 07:10:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: TheKnightVigilant
    This experiment was unneccesary because it was already clear that there were 2 sister Lucy's from even the most basic visual analysis. It is impossible that these two women are one and the same because their respective facial structures are totally different in such a way that not even aging or surgery can account for the difference.


    Where could I read the real story about the two Lucys. Can someone provide a link?

     :reading:
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.


    Offline Pelele

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 185
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    2 Sister Lucys now proven
    « Reply #8 on: October 16, 2013, 07:35:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Cantarella
    Quote from: TheKnightVigilant
    This experiment was unneccesary because it was already clear that there were 2 sister Lucy's from even the most basic visual analysis. It is impossible that these two women are one and the same because their respective facial structures are totally different in such a way that not even aging or surgery can account for the difference.


    Where could I read the real story about the two Lucys. Can someone provide a link?

     :reading:


    Well, here's one link: http://traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/g12htArt2_TwoSisterLucys.htm

    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10512
    • Reputation: +3267/-207
    • Gender: Male
    • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
    2 Sister Lucys now proven
    « Reply #9 on: October 16, 2013, 08:21:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Pelele
    Quote from: Cantarella
    Quote from: TheKnightVigilant
    This experiment was unneccesary because it was already clear that there were 2 sister Lucy's from even the most basic visual analysis. It is impossible that these two women are one and the same because their respective facial structures are totally different in such a way that not even aging or surgery can account for the difference.


    Where could I read the real story about the two Lucys. Can someone provide a link?

     :reading:


    Well, here's one link: http://traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/g12htArt2_TwoSisterLucys.htm


    See this link:

    http://traditioninaction.org/Questions/B652_Lucys.html

    Offline Thorn

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1188
    • Reputation: +710/-81
    • Gender: Female
    2 Sister Lucys now proven
    « Reply #10 on: October 16, 2013, 08:23:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • How much do you want to bet that even with this experiment, there will STILL be those who believe that there's only one Lucy?   Most people could see that there were 2 distinct Lucys with the side-by-side presentation of Dr. Horvat, but there were those who didn't believe!
    I don't believe that the Vatican did away with the real Lucy.  I think she died a natural death as I saw some place the death records of the convent with her listed.  Can't remember the year she died.
    I believe that the Vatican then had another sister named Lucy continue on in a fraud to keep Fatima going.  It's a money-maker after all.  Let's be realistic.
    This is not to say that Fatima itself is a fraud, but the Vatican is not the most trustworthy organization these past decades and they must have thought that the faithful needed a live person to keep the controversy over the third secret alive.

    This reminds me of the controversy about Malachi Martin.  With all the things to show just what kind of person he really was, there's STILL people who think he's wonderful.  Human nature is a strange thing, isn't it?  
    "I will lead her into solitude and there I will speak to her heart.  Osee 2:14


    Offline Pelele

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 185
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    2 Sister Lucys now proven
    « Reply #11 on: October 16, 2013, 08:52:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Thorn
    Human nature is a strange thing, isn't it?


    Indeed it is, for here you are, failing to see the obvious reason for an impostor: to hide the TRUTH about the falsity of the novus ordo sect and these antipopes and to push this sect forwards with the approval of the last living seer of Fatima!

    There's no doubt the real Sr. Lucy would have denounced Vatican 2 and these antichrist antipopes and the jig would've been up.

    It seems you don't even believe in Fatima.

    Offline LKCTexas

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 15
    • Reputation: +39/-0
    • Gender: Male
    2 Sister Lucys now proven
    « Reply #12 on: October 16, 2013, 08:56:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The diabolical control of the Vatican was very capable of setting up "two Sister Lucy's"  There is now a book out about the "two Lee Harvey Oswalds" in the assassination of JFK (not defending JFK).  Likely the same Masonic/Zionists were involved in both and likely over nearly the same time period.  I believe Dr. Horvat would not put her PHD on the line unless she is convinced by the evidence.

    Regarding the newest modernist pope we see the diabolical disorientation rage on with the Pope's entrustment of the world to Mary this past Sunday, 10/13.  The Pope's prayer is shown below, a prayer we should have expected from a modernist Pope.  It is a travesty and mockery of Our Lord and Lady.  No mention of the "Immaculate Heart", "Consecration", or more disturbing, ending the prayer with "our Lord Jesus" instead of "our Lord Jesus Christ", seemingly denying His Divinity. I believe this prayer will only affirm the coming chastisement until a miracle is given for the Pope to perform the consecration according to God's command.  Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us!

    Pope Francis Act of Entrustment of the World to Mary
    with no mention of "Consecration" or the "Immaculate Heart"

    October 13, 2013 - Vatican City
    (text supplied by Fatima Center workers in Rome who were at the Vatican for the ceremony)

    Act of Entrustment to Mary

    Blessed Virgin Mary of Fatima, with renewed gratitude for Your maternal presence we unite our voice with that of all the generations who call You blessed.

    We celebrate in You the great works of God, Who never tires to incline with mercy on humanity, afflicted by evil and wounded by sin, to heal it and save it.

    Accept with the compassion of a Mother the act of entrustment which today we make with confidence, before this Your image to us so dear.

    We are certain that each one of us is precious to Your eyes and that nothing which dwells in our hearts is unknown to You.

    Let us reach Your sweet gaze and receive the consoling caress of Your smile.

    Guard our life in Your arms: bless and strengthen every good desire; revive and foster faith; sustain and illumine hope; create and enliven charity; guide all of us in the path of holiness.

    Teach us Your same preferential love for the small and the poor, for the excluded and the suffering, for sinners and the lost: gather all under Your protection and give all of us to Your beloved Son, our Lord Jesus.

    Amen.

    Offline Thorn

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1188
    • Reputation: +710/-81
    • Gender: Female
    2 Sister Lucys now proven
    « Reply #13 on: October 16, 2013, 09:39:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Pelele, as a cloistered Carmelite nun, it seems highly unlikely that the real Sister Lucy would have ever said anything about the church.  Theirs is a life of prayer, penance & contemplation.  No radio, newspapers or outside news.  The Mother Superior would get news of the outside world in case of necessity only.  They may have gotten news about the church, but they would not consider it their business to comment.  
    "I will lead her into solitude and there I will speak to her heart.  Osee 2:14

    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10512
    • Reputation: +3267/-207
    • Gender: Male
    • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
    2 Sister Lucys now proven
    « Reply #14 on: October 16, 2013, 09:43:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Thorn
    How much do you want to bet that even with this experiment, there will STILL be those who believe that there's only one Lucy?   Most people could see that there were 2 distinct Lucys with the side-by-side presentation of Dr. Horvat, but there were those who didn't believe!
    I don't believe that the Vatican did away with the real Lucy.  I think she died a natural death as I saw some place the death records of the convent with her listed.  Can't remember the year she died.
    I believe that the Vatican then had another sister named Lucy continue on in a fraud to keep Fatima going.  It's a money-maker after all.  Let's be realistic.
    This is not to say that Fatima itself is a fraud, but the Vatican is not the most trustworthy organization these past decades and they must have thought that the faithful needed a live person to keep the controversy over the third secret alive.

    This reminds me of the controversy about Malachi Martin.  With all the things to show just what kind of person he really was, there's STILL people who think he's wonderful.  Human nature is a strange thing, isn't it?  


    Scrow down to the Death Notices of the Carmel Archives.  Looks like
    something happen to the archives. They are not legible.  I do remember
    when they were readable.
    The original year of her death was in 1949.

    http://www.traditioninaction.org/Questions/E016_SrLucyRepercussions.htm