Author Topic: "Who am I to judge gαy people?" (Read 4593 times)

ClarkSmith · « **Reply #30 on:** July 29, 2013, 11:21:38 PM »

Quote from: TheKnightVigilant

Quote
That horrible crime, on account of which corrupt and obscene cities were destroyed by fire through divine condemnation, causes us most bitter sorrow and shocks our mind, impelling us to repress such a crime with the greatest possible zeal.

Quite opportunely the Fifth Lateran Council [1512-1517] issued this decree: "Let any member of the clergy caught in that vice against nature, given that the wrath of God falls over the sons of perfidy, be removed from the clerical order or forced to do penance in a monastery" (chap. 4, X, V, 31).

So that the contagion of such a grave offense may not advance with greater audacity by taking advantage of impunity, which is the greatest incitement to sin, and so as to more severely punish the clerics who are guilty of this nefarious crime and who are not frightened by the death of their souls, we determine that they should be handed over to the severity of the secular authority, which enforces civil law.

Therefore, wishing to pursue with greater rigor than we have exerted since the beginning of our pontificate, we establish that any priest or member of the clergy, either secular or regular, who commits such an execrable crime, by force of the present law be deprived of every clerical privilege, of every post, dignity and ecclesiastical benefit, and having been degraded by an ecclesiastical judge, let him be immediately delivered to the secular authority to be put to death, as mandated by law as the fitting punishment for laymen who have sunk into this abyss.

-Pope St. Pius V

http://www.traditioninaction.org/religious/n009rp_ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖPriests.htm

Saint Peter Damian wrote a book condemning ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ acts by priests. 'Book of Gomorrah' is worth reading if you have the time. Saint Peter Damian is considered a Doctor of the Church. He should be a saint that modern clergy turn to since he faced similar problems in his time. He is mostly ignored, though.

Viva Cristo Rey · « **Reply #31 on:** July 29, 2013, 11:45:29 PM »

Back in 1988 , Rome excommunicated archbishop Lefebvre for disobedience.

At the same time Rome protected rapists of children and other pervert priests who broke their vows of chastity.

There was forgiveness to perverts.

There was no forgiveness to traditional Catholics.

They punished good and rewarded evil. Rome is not Catholic.

Pope Francis is the Pope and he is supposed to preach against evil. He is lukewarm

Pope st Pope Pius V said that all the evils in the world was because of lukewarm Catholics.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #32 on:** July 30, 2013, 12:20:51 AM »

Francis is really beyond the pale of credulity. The sifting continues.

Francis is an absurdity, Benedict's (likely) forced resignation is not going to help the Jews.

Croix de Fer · « **Reply #33 on:** July 30, 2013, 12:34:45 AM »

The legions of demons are all cheering and celebrating, while exclaiming, "gαy it up, man, gαy it up!" ..... "our father, Satan, wants more children's lives destroyed and severed from the Holy One's Church through pervert predation by our minions wearing the Roman collar."

(note: they do not say Jesus' name, instead, they say "Holy One's" because they tremble at the mention of His name.)

Frances · « **Reply #34 on:** July 30, 2013, 01:53:13 AM »

:scratchchin:Think About It.
Since when does a Catholic priest, much less the pope, declare he hasn't the right to judge sin- when Christ Himself gives to priests that power? Also, since when does any Catholic, much less the pope, "search" for God when He has already proven Himself to be Jesus Christ? Can Francis be telling us the truth? That he really can't judge, and that he is "searching" for God? If so, think what that means.
:furtive: