None of the above websites have ever supported sedevacantism or benevacantism. I'm not surprised that the Remnant wouldn't show Vigano's video. Of course many here will think that this is a heinous crime, which only goes to show that Matt was correct in not showing the video at his conference.
I'm also not surprised that Vigano is starting to be a benevacantist. It was only a matter of time. I'm not a fan of Vigano, so I don't care one way or the other.
But what is interesting to me is that, excepting the SSPX, the other three outlets (and you could throw Marshall in there as well) we’re all Vigano fans, and we’re all part of the “unite the clans” mindset.
Now they all appear to want to separate from Vigano, rather than unite.
Interestingly, some in that crowd (eg., SSPX; Roberto de Mattei, et al) we’re already at odds with Vigano because of his position regarding V2.
The common denominator of both groups separating from Vigano is that they’re both unwilling to separate from conciliarism:
Some are married to the Council, like Mattei, (who ironically himself has I issues with the legitimacy of Francis),
Others are tied to the legitimacy of Francis, but reject the Council.
So one way or the other, they’re all going along with the revolution, even if whining about it along the way.