Wait- why should a contrary opinion of another prelate be so damaging that they needed to be “protected” from Vigano’s statement? No one was forcing his views on them . The audience deserved to hear from the Archbishop and critically weigh his position . Just being at this conference does not bode any priest or bishop well under Bergoglioism, so what’s the big deal? It doesn’t change the face of their R and R stance if that’s what they subscribe to . It would have made them a bit more magnanimous towards the other clans is all - lol. I think they fear that the dominoes will too easily fall if exposed, and apparently Trad Inc still needs it to stand.Vigano is a big domino
There are 2 R&R's.
One looks like this:
Rr (Big on "recognize;" but little "resist"). That's the CIC, indult, neo-SSPX.
The other looks like this:
rR (Little "recognize;" but big on "resist"). That's the Resistance.
The former is more concerned with unity; the latter with truth.
That's why they'll forever be oil and water (and MM doesn't want that oil polluting his water).